Dataset Information

Comparison of estimates and time series stability of Korea Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

In South Korea, there are two nationwide health surveys conducted by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: the Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS) and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). The two surveys are directly comparable, as they have the same target population with some common items, and because both surveys are used in various analyses, identifying the similarities and disparities between the two surveys would promote their appropriate use. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the estimates of six variables in KCHS and eight variables in KNHANES over a six-year period and compare time series stability of region-specific and sex- and age-specific subgroup estimates.

Methods

Data from adults aged 19 years or older in the 2010-2015 KCHS and KNHANES were examined to analyze the differences of estimates and 95% confidence interval for self-rated health, current smoking rate, monthly drinking rate, hypertension diagnosis rate, diabetes diagnosis rate, obesity prevalence, hypertension prevalence, and diabetes prevalence. The variables were then clustered into subgroups by city as well as sex and age to assess the time series stability of the estimates based on mean square error.

Results

With the exception of self-rated health, the estimates taken based on questionnaires, namely current smoking rate, monthly drinking rate, hypertension diagnosis rate, and diabetes diagnosis rate, only differed by less than 1.0%p for both KCHS and KNHANES. However, for KNHANES, estimates taken from physical examination data, namely obesity prevalence, hypertension prevalence, and diabetes prevalence, differed by 1.9-8.4%p, which was greater than the gap in the estimates taken from questionnaires. KCHS had a greater time series stability for subgroup estimates than KNHANES.

Conclusions

When using the data from KCHS and KNHANES, the data should be selected and used based on the purpose of analysis and policy and in consideration of the various differences between the two data.

SUBMITTER: Ki JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6533555 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of estimates and time series stability of Korea Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Ki Ji Son JS Kim Ho H

Epidemiology and health 20190407

<h4>Objectives</h4>In South Korea, there are two nationwide health surveys conducted by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: the Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS) and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). The two surveys are directly comparable, as they have the same target population with some common items, and because both surveys are used in various analyses, identifying the similarities and disparities between the two surveys would promote thei ...[more]

PMID: 30999734

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesLatent Tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is marked by dynamic host-pathogen interactions with persistent low-grade inflammation and is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) including acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and stroke. However, few studies assess the relationship between LTBI and hypertension, an intermediate of CVD. We sought to determine the association between LTBI and hypertension using data representative of the adult US population.MethodsWe performed cross-sectional analyses using data from the 2011-2012 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Eligible participants included adults with valid QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test results who also had blood pressure measures and no history of TB disease. LTBI was defined by a positive QFT-GIT. We defined hypertension by either elevated measured blood pressure levels (i.e., systolic ≥130mmHg or diastolic ≥80mmHg) or known hypertension indications (i.e., self-reported previous diagnosis or use of antihypertensive medications). Analyses were performed using robust quasi-Poisson regressions and accounted for the stratified probability sampling design of NHANES.ResultsThe overall prevalence of LTBI was 5.7% (95%CI 4.7-6.7) and hypertension was present among 48.9% (95%CI 45.2-52.7) of participants. The prevalence of hypertension was higher among those with LTBI (58.5%, 95%CI 52.4-64.5) than those without LTBI (48.3%, 95%CI 44.5-52.1) (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.3). However, after adjusting for confounders, the prevalence of hypertension was similar for those with and without LTBI (adjusted PR=1.0, 95%CI 0.9 -1.1). Among individuals without CVD risk factors of elevated BMI (PRnormal BMI=1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.0), hyperglycemia (PReuglycemia=1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.5), or cigarette smoking (PRnon-smokers=1.2, 95%CI 1.1-1.4), the unadjusted prevalence of hypertension was higher among those with LTBI vs. no LTBI.ConclusionsMore than half of adults with LTBI in the US had hypertension. Importantly, we observed a relationship between LTBI and hypertension among those without established CVD risk factors.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious research has suggested that poor oral health is positively associated with frailty. The objective of this study was to explore associations of key oral diseases (periodontal disease, tooth loss), and oral hygiene and management behaviors with the level of frailty in community-dwelling older Korean adults using national representative survey data.MethodsThis study used cross-sectional, 6th and 7th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI, VII) data. Adults aged 50+ years were included. Frailty was measured using frailty phenotype (FP) and frailty index (FI). FP was determined using five frailty criteria, i.e., weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, slowness, or low physical activity, and the level of frailty was classified with the number of criteria present (robust, none; pre-frail, 1-2; frail, 3+). FI was determined using a 44-item FI constructed according to a standard protocol, and the level of frailty was classified as robust (FI: ≤ 0.08), pre-frail (FI: 0.08-0.25), and frail (FI: ≥ 0.25). Multiple ordinal regression analyses were conducted with each type of frailty as the outcome variable. Independent variables of interest were the periodontal status, number of teeth, and practices on oral hygiene and management. Analyses were additionally adjusted for participants' socioeconomic, diet, and behavioral characteristics.ResultsThe prevalence of frailty was 4.38% according to the FP classification (n = 4156), 10.74% according to the FI classification (n = 15,073). In the final adjusted model, having more teeth and brushing after all three meals were significantly associated with lower odds of being more frail (in both frailty models); no significant association was observed between periodontal disease and frailty.ConclusionsFindings from this study show having more teeth and practicing adequate brushing are significantly associated with frailty. Due to limitations of the study design, well-designed longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Dataset Information

Comparison of estimates and time series stability of Korea Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of estimates and time series stability of Korea Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets