Dataset Information

Indications and Safety of the Zygomatic Osteotomy in Middle Cranial Fossa Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Review.

ABSTRACT: Background Zygomatic osteotomy, an adjunct to middle cranial fossa (MCF) surgical approaches, improves the superior-inferior angle of approach and minimizes temporal lobe retraction. However, a decision-making algorithm for selective use of the zygomatic osteotomy and the impact of the zygomatic osteotomy on surgical complications have not been well documented. Objective We described an algorithm for deciding whether to use a zygomatic osteotomy in MCF surgery and evaluated complications associated with a zygomatic osteotomy. Methods A retrospective review of MCF cases over 11 years at our academic tertiary referral center was conducted. Demographic variables, tumor characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative complications were extracted. Results Of the 87 patients included, 15 (17%) received a zygomatic osteotomy. Surgical trajectory oriented from anterior to posterior (A-P) was significantly correlated with the use of the zygomatic osteotomy. Among the cases approached from A-P, we found (receiver-operating characteristic curve) that the cut-off tumor size that predicted a zygomatic osteotomy was 30 mm. Of the 87 cases included, 15 patients had a complication. The multivariate logistic regression model failed to reveal any significant correlation between complications and zygomatic osteotomies. Conclusions We found that the most important factor determining the use of a zygomatic osteotomy was anticipated trajectory. A-P approaches were most highly correlated with zygomatic osteotomy. Within those cases, a lesion size cut-off of 30 mm was the secondary predicting factor of zygomatic osteotomy use. The odds of suffering a surgical complication were not significantly increased by use of zygomatic osteotomy.

SUBMITTER: Neal E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6534730 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Surgery on posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and pineal region (PR) carries the risks of intraoperative trauma to the brainstem structures, blood loss, venous air embolism (VAE), cardiovascular instability, and other complications. Success in surgery, among other factors, depends on selecting the optimal patient position. Our objective was to find associations between patient positioning, incidence of intraoperative complications, neurological recovery, and the extent of surgery. Methods: This observational study was conducted in two medical centers: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (USA) and The Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (Russian Federation). Patients were distributed in two groups based on the surgical position: sitting position (SP) or horizontal position (HP). The inclusion criteria were adult patients with space-occupying or vascular lesions requiring an open PCF or PR surgery. Perioperative variables were recorded and summarized using descriptive statistics. The post-treatment survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 3 months. Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the study: 53 in SP and 56 in HP. A higher proportion of patients in the HP patients had >300 mL intraoperative blood loss compared to the SP group (32 vs. 13%; p = 0.0250). Intraoperative VAE was diagnosed in 40% of SP patients vs. 0% in the HP group (p < 0.0001). However, trans-esophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring was more common in the SP group. Intraoperative hypotension was documented in 28% of SP patients compared to 9% in HP group (p = 0.0126). A higher proportion of SP patients experienced a new neurological symptom compared to the HP group (49 vs. 29%; p = 0.0281). The extent of tumor resection, postoperative 3-months survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were not different in the groups. Conclusions: The SP was associated with, less intraoperative bleeding, increased intraoperative hypotension, VAE, and postoperative neurological deficit. More HP patients experienced macroglossia and increased blood loss. At 3 months, there was no difference of parameters between the two groups. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: registration number NCT03364283.

Dataset Information

Indications and Safety of the Zygomatic Osteotomy in Middle Cranial Fossa Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets