Dataset Information

High perceived social support and hospital readmissions in an older multi-ethnic, limited English proficiency, safety-net population.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Early readmission amongst older safety-net hospitalized adults is costly. Interventions to prevent early readmission have had mixed success. The role of perceived social support is unclear. We examined the association of perceived social support in 30-day readmission or death in older adults admitted to a safety-net hospital. METHODS:This is an observational cohort study derived from the Support From Hospital to Home for Elders (SHHE) trial. Participants were community-dwelling English, Spanish and Chinese speaking older adults admitted to medicine wards at an urban safety-net hospital in San Francisco. We assessed perceived social support using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). We defined high social support as the highest quartile of MSPSS. We ascertained 30-day readmission and mortality based on a combination of participant self-report, hospital and death records. We used multiple/multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient demographics, health status, and health behaviors. We tested for whether race/ethnicity modified the effect high social support had on 30-day readmission or death by including a race-social support interaction term. RESULTS:Participants (n?=?674) had mean age of 66.2 (SD 9.0), with 18.8% White, 24.8% Black, 31.9% Asian, and 19.3% Latino. The 30-day readmission or death rate was 15.0%. Those with high social support had half the odds of readmission or death than those with low social support (OR?=?0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.88). Interaction analyses revealed race modified this association; higher social support was protective against readmission or death among minorities (AOR?=?0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.76) but increased likelihood of readmission or death among Whites (AOR?=?3.7, 95% CI 1.07-12.9). CONCLUSION:In older safety-net patients nearing discharge, high perceived social support may protect against 30-day readmission or death among minorities. Assessing patients' social support may aid targeting of transitional care resources and intervention design. How perceived social support functions across racial/ethnic groups in health outcomes warrants further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION:NIH trials registry number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01221532 .

SUBMITTER: Chan B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6534878 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

High perceived social support and hospital readmissions in an older multi-ethnic, limited English proficiency, safety-net population.

Chan Brian B Goldman L Elizabeth LE Sarkar Urmimala U Guzman David D Critchfield Jeff J Saha Somnath S Kushel Margot M

BMC health services research 20190524 1

<h4>Background</h4>Early readmission amongst older safety-net hospitalized adults is costly. Interventions to prevent early readmission have had mixed success. The role of perceived social support is unclear. We examined the association of perceived social support in 30-day readmission or death in older adults admitted to a safety-net hospital.<h4>Methods</h4>This is an observational cohort study derived from the Support From Hospital to Home for Elders (SHHE) trial. Participants were community- ...[more]

PMID: 31126336

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Limited English proficiency (LEP) is associated with poor health status and worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE:To examine disparities in hypertension between National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) respondents with LEP versus adequate English proficiency. DESIGN:Retrospective analysis of multi-year survey data. PARTICIPANTS:Adults 18 years of age and older who participated in the NHANES survey during the period 2003-2012. MAIN MEASURES:We defined participants with LEP as anyone who completed the NHANES survey in a language other than English or with the support of an interpreter. Using logistic regression, we estimated the odds ratio for undiagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP)?>?140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP)?>?90 mmHg) among LEP participants relative to those with adequate English proficiency. We adjusted for sociodemographic, acculturation-related, and hypertension-related variables. KEY RESULTS:Fourteen percent (n?=?3,269) of the participants had limited English proficiency: 12.4% (n?=?2906) used a Spanish questionnaire and 1.6% (n?=?363) used an interpreter to complete the survey in another language. Those with LEP had higher odds of elevated blood pressure on physical examination (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]?=?1.47 [1.07-2.03]). This finding persisted among participants using an interpreter (AOR?=?1.88 [1.15-3.06]) but not among those using the Spanish questionnaire (AOR?=?1.32 [0.98-1.80]). In a subgroup analysis, we found that the majority of uncontrolled hypertension was concentrated among individuals with a known diagnosis of hypertension (AOR?=?1.80 [1.16-2.81]) rather than those with undiagnosed hypertension (AOR?=?1.14 [0.74-1.75]). Interpreter use was associated with increased odds of uncontrolled hypertension, especially among patients who were not being medically managed for hypertension (AOR?=?6.56 [1.30-33.12]). CONCLUSIONS:In a nationally representative sample, participants with LEP were more likely to have poorly controlled hypertension than those with adequate English proficiency. LEP is an important driver of disparities in hypertension management and outcomes.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Language barriers disrupt communication and impede informed consent for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) undergoing healthcare procedures. Effective interventions for this disparity remain unclear. OBJECTIVE:Assess the impact of a bedside interpreter phone system intervention on informed consent for patients with LEP and compare outcomes to those of English speakers. DESIGN:Prospective, pre-post intervention implementation study using propensity analysis. SUBJECTS:Hospitalized patients undergoing invasive procedures on the cardiovascular, general surgery or orthopedic surgery floors. INTERVENTION:Installation of dual-handset interpreter phones at every bedside enabling 24-h immediate access to professional interpreters. MAIN MEASURES:Primary predictor: pre- vs. post-implementation group; secondary predictor: post-implementation patients with LEP vs. English speakers. Primary outcomes: three central informed consent elements, patient-reported understanding of the (1) reasons for and (2) risks of the procedure and (3) having had all questions answered. We considered consent adequately informed when all three elements were met. KEY RESULTS:We enrolled 152 Chinese- and Spanish-speaking patients with LEP (84 pre- and 68 post-implementation) and 86 English speakers. Post-implementation (vs. pre-implementation) patients with LEP were more likely to meet criteria for adequately informed consent (54% vs. 29%, p?=?0.001) and, after propensity score adjustment, had significantly higher odds of adequately informed consent (AOR 2.56; 95% CI, 1.15-5.72) as well as of each consent element individually. However, compared to post-implementation English speakers, post-implementation patients with LEP had significantly lower adjusted odds of adequately informed consent (AOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91). CONCLUSIONS:A bedside interpreter phone system intervention to increase rapid access to professional interpreters was associated with improvements in patient-reported informed consent and should be considered by hospitals seeking to improve care for patients with LEP; however, these improvements did not eliminate the language-based disparity. Additional clinician educational interventions and more language-concordant care may be necessary for informed consent to equal that for English speakers.

Project description:BackgroundLimited English proficiency (LEP) is an important driver of health disparities. Many successful patient-level interventions to prevent chronic disease progression and complications have used automated telephone self-management support, which relies on patient activation and communication to achieve improved health outcomes. It is not clear whether these interventions are similarly applicable to patients with LEP compared to patients with English proficiency.ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were as follows: (1) To examine the impact of LEP on patient engagement (primary outcome) with a 12-month language-concordant self-management program that included automated telephone self-management support, designed for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). (2) To assess the impact of LEP on change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and albuminuria (secondary outcomes) resulting from the self-management program.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of the Kidney Awareness Registry and Education (KARE) pilot trial (NCT01530958) which was funded by the National Institutes of Health in August 2011, approved by the University of California Institutional Review Board in October 2011 (No. 11-07399), and executed between 2013 and 2015. Multivariable logistic and linear models were used to examine various facets of patient engagement with the CKD self-management support program by LEP status. Patient engagement was defined by patient's use of educational materials, completion of a health coaching action plan, and degree of participation with automated telephone self-management support. Changes in SBP and albuminuria at 12 months by LEP status were determined using multivariable linear mixed models.ResultsOf 137 study participants, 53 (38.7%) reported LEP, of which 45 (85%) were Spanish speaking and 8 (15%) Cantonese speaking. While patients with LEP and English proficiency similarly used the program's educational materials (85% [17/20] vs 88% [30/34], P=.69) and completed an action plan (81% [22/27] vs 74% [35/47], P=.49), those with LEP engaged more with the automated telephone self-management support component. Average call completion was 66% among patients with LEP compared with 57% among those with English proficiency; patients with LEP requested more health coach telephone calls (P=.08) and had a significantly longer average automated call duration (3.3 [SD 1.4] min vs 2.2 [1.1 min], P<.001), indicating higher patient engagement. Patients with LEP randomized to self-management support had a larger, though nonstatistically significant (P=.74), change in SBP (-4.5 mmHg; 95% CI -9.4 to 0.3) and albuminuria (-72.4 mg/dL; 95% CI -208.9 to 64.1) compared with patients with English proficiency randomized to self-management support (-2.1 mmHg; 95% CI -8.6 to 4.3 and -11.1 mg/dL; 95% CI -166.9 to 144.7).ConclusionsPatients with LEP with CKD were equally or more engaged with a language-concordant, culturally appropriate telehealth intervention compared with their English-speaking counterparts. Augmented telehealth may be useful in mitigating communication barriers among patients with LEP.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01530958; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01530958.

Dataset Information

High perceived social support and hospital readmissions in an older multi-ethnic, limited English proficiency, safety-net population.

Publications

High perceived social support and hospital readmissions in an older multi-ethnic, limited English proficiency, safety-net population.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets