Dataset Information

Iatrogenic Injuries in Percutaneous Pinning Techniques for Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is little information regarding anatomic structures at risk during closed percutaneous treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures. This study evaluates a variety of common percutaneous techniques with the hypothesis that each approach presents unique risks to tendons and neurovascular structures.

Methods

Seven cadaveric hands were used for this study. The senior author, a board-certified hand surgeon with more than 20 years of experience, used a mini-C arm to pass 1.6-mm Kirschner wires (K-wires). The 4 percutaneous techniques employed were anterograde, retrograde, cross-pinning, and transverse fixations. Meticulous superficial dissection was carried out, with fixation from all 4 techniques left in place, to identify any tendons or neurovascular structures penetrated by the K-wires.

Results

All techniques demonstrated penetration of at least 1 adjacent structure. The anterograde technique showed penetration of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon in 5 out of 7 cadavers. In the retrograde approach, the K-wire impaled either the extensor digitorum communis or the extensor digitorum minimi tendons in 4 out of 7 cadavers. The transverse pinning technique exhibited injury to the dorsal cutaneous ulnar nerve in 2 of the specimens. In the retrograde cross-pin technique, there were 2 penetrations of the digital branch of the dorsal cutaneous ulnar nerve.

Conclusions

None of the described percutaneous techniques for treating fifth metacarpal neck fractures eliminate the potential for damage to surrounding tendons or nerves. Each technique has at risk structures that the treating surgeon should be aware of in order to anticipate potential complications and counsel patients accordingly.

SUBMITTER: Akinleye SD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6535944 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAntegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN) with Kirschner wire (K-wire) is a minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique. This procedure has been widely performed to treat the fifth metacarpal neck fracture (FMNF) in adults. This study was performed to determine whether using AIMN with a single K-wire to treat FMNF in adolescents would have good clinical and radiographic outcomes.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 21 children (aged 11-16 years) with FMNF were treated using AIMN with a single K-wire from May 2017 to January 2020 in our hospital. Indications for intervention were severe displacement with malrotation deformity, apex dorsal angulation of greater than 40°, or both. Collected data included apex dorsal angulation, range of motion (ROM) in the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 12-24 months (average, 16.57 months), and all patients obtained anatomical reduction postoperatively. The healing time was 2.69 ± 0.83 months (range, 2-4 months). Average apex dorsal angulation was reduced significantly from 44.49°±2.64° to 15.74°±2.47° (P < 0.001). The average ROM in the MCP joint and apex dorsal angulation of the injured side were not significantly different from those of the uninjured side. The average DASH score was 1.76 ± 1.48 (range, 0-4), the mean VAS was 0.19 ± 0.60 (range, 0-2), and the mean grip strength was 91.55 %±4.52 % (range, 85-101 %). No secondary displacement, dysfunction, nonunion, infection, or osteonecrosis was observed during the follow-up. Although premature epiphyseal closure was found in one patient, no long-term clinical finding of angulation or shortening was identified.ConclusionsAntegrade intramedullary fixation with single K-wire was an effective and reliable technique that successfully resulted in good functional and cosmetic outcomes for treating adolescents with FMNF. The impact on the growth plate was low in this population given that most patients were at or approaching skeletal maturity.Level of evidenceLevel IV.