Dataset Information

Association of Medicaid Expansion With Access to Rehabilitative Care in Adult Trauma Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability for patients of all ages, many of whom are also among the most likely to be uninsured. Passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was intended to improve access to care through improvements in insurance. However, despite nationally reported changes in the payer mix of patients, the extent of the law's impact on insurance coverage among trauma patients is unknown, as is its success in improving trauma outcomes and promoting increased access to rehabilitation.

Objective

To use rigorous quasi-experimental regression techniques to assess the extent of changes in insurance coverage, outcomes, and discharge to rehabilitation among adult trauma patients before and after Medicaid expansion and implementation of the remainder of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Design, setting, and participants

Quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference analysis assessed adult trauma patients aged 19 to 64 years in 5 Medicaid expansion (Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New Mexico) and 4 nonexpansion (Florida, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Texas) states.

Interventions/exposure

Policy implementation in January 2014.

Main outcomes and measures

Changes in insurance coverage, outcomes (mortality, morbidity, failure to rescue, and length of stay), and discharge to rehabilitation.

Results

A total of 283 878 patients from Medicaid expansion states and 285 851 patients from nonexpansion states were included (mean age [SD], 41.9 [14.1] years; 206 698 [36.3%] women). Adults with injuries in expansion states experienced a 13.7 percentage point decline in uninsured individuals (95% CI, 14.1-13.3; baseline: 22.7%) after Medicaid expansion compared with nonexpansion states. This coincided with a 7.4 percentage point increase in discharge to rehabilitation (95% CI, 7.0-7.8; baseline: 14.7%) that persisted across inpatient rehabilitation facilities (4.5 percentage points), home health agencies (2.9 percentage points), and skilled nursing facilities (1.0 percentage points). There was also a 2.6 percentage point drop in failure to rescue and a 0.84-day increase in average length of stay. Rehabilitation changes were most pronounced among patients eligible for rehabilitation coverage under the 2-midnight (8.4 percentage points) and 60% (10.2 percentage points) Medicaid payment rules. Medicaid expansion increased rehabilitation access for patients with the most severe injuries and conditions requiring postdischarge care (eg, pelvic fracture). It mitigated race/ethnicity-, age-, and sex-based disparities in which patients use rehabilitation.

Conclusions and relevance

This multistate assessment demonstrated significant changes in insurance coverage and discharge to rehabilitation among adult trauma patients that were greater in Medicaid expansion than nonexpansion states. By targeting subgroups of the trauma population most likely to be uninsured, rehabilitation gains associated with Medicaid have the potential to improve survival and functional outcomes for more than 60 000 additional adult trauma patients nationally in expansion states.

SUBMITTER: Zogg CK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6537775 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Trauma is the leading cause of death and disability among young adults in the United States. Young adults are also the age group most likely to be uninsured. Implementation of Medicaid expansion through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has increased insurance coverage, but its associations with trauma care and outcomes among young adults nationwide remain unknown. We examined whether Medicaid expansion, in its first year, was associated with changes in insurance coverage and improved outcomes in young adults hospitalized for traumatic injury. Objective:To assess the associations of ACA Medicaid expansion with insurance coverage, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue, access to rehabilitation, and unplanned readmissions among hospitalized young adult trauma patients across many US states. Design, Setting, and Participants:We used the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases to examine changes in insurance coverage and risk adjusted outcomes among young adults (age 19 to 44 years) who were hospitalized for injuries before and after Medicaid expansion and open enrollment occurred (2012-2013 vs 2014) in 11 US states that expanded Medicaid through the ACA. We also performed difference-in-difference analyses to compare these changes between 3 expansion states and 3 non-expansion states within the same geographic region. Results:Of the 141 187 trauma patients hospitalized across 11 Medicaid expansion states, 43 871 (31.1%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 31.4 (7.6) years. Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in Medicaid coverage from 16 229 individuals (16.7%) to 15 358 individuals (34.9%) (difference: 18.2% [95% CI, 16.5%-20.0%]; P < .001), a decrease in lack of insurance from 27 016 individuals (27.8%) to 5589 individuals (12.7%) (difference: -15.1% [95% CI, -16.8% to -13.5%]; P < .001), and an increase in discharge to rehabilitation from 9220 individuals (11.4%) to 4736 individuals (12.6%) (difference: 1.16% [95% CI, 0.55%-1.77%]; P < .001). We found no significant reductions in in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue, or unplanned readmissions. Similar results were found when 3 of these states were compared with 3 geographically and demographically similar states that had not enacted Medicaid expansion. Conclusions and Relevance:The first year of implementation of Medicaid expansion and open enrollment across 11 selected US states was associated with significant increases in Medicaid coverage, reductions in uninsured rates, and increased access to postdischarge rehabilitation among young adults hospitalized for injury. However, this study found no significant reductions in in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue, or unplanned readmissions.

Project description:ImportanceState decisions not to expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act could reduce emergency access to acute care hospitals.ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between state Medicaid expansion and emergency access to acute care hospitals in the United States.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study linked hospital-level data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from 2007 to 2017 to US Census data for all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Geospatial analyses and difference-in-differences regression models were used to compare temporal changes in the size of the population without 30-minute access to acute care hospitals between 32 states that expanded Medicaid with the population without access in 19 that did not, before and after expansion. Analyses focused on the total population and those with low incomes; secondary analyses examined emergency access to safety-net hospitals.ExposuresState-level Medicaid expansion.Main outcomes and measuresPopulation without emergency access to an acute care hospital, defined as living outside a 30-minute drive of any hospital.ResultsStates that did not expand Medicaid experienced an increase in the population without access to hospitals overall (without expansion: 6.76% to 6.79% [0.03%]; vs with expansion: 5.65% to 5.35% [-0.30%]; difference-in-differences, 0.33%; 95% CI, 0.33%-0.34%; P < .001) and for low-income persons (without expansion: 7.43% to 7.39% [-0.04%]; vs with expansion: 6.25% to 6.15% [-0.10%]; difference-in-differences, 0.06%; 95% CI, 0.05%-0.07%; P < .001). If access changes in nonexpansion states were the same as expansion states, an estimated 421 000 more persons overall and 48 000 more low-income persons would have retained access. States that did not expand Medicaid experienced an increase in the population without access to safety-net hospitals overall (46.91% to 47.70% [0.79%] vs 33.94% to 33.07% [-0.87%]; difference-in-differences, 1.66%; 95% CI, 1.64%-1.66%; P < .001) and for low-income persons (45.28% to 46.14% [0.86%] vs 33.00% to 32.23% [-0.77%]; difference-in-differences, 1.63%; 95% CI, 1.63%-1.67%; P < .001). If access changes in nonexpansion states were the same as expansion states, an estimated 2 242 000 more persons overall and 364 000 more low-income persons would have retained access.Conclusions and relevanceStates that did not expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act were associated with worse emergency access to acute care hospitals compared with states that expanded Medicaid.

Project description:Importance:In the United States, nonprofit hospitals receive tax-exempt status with the expectation that they provide a high level of benefit to local communities. Prior work has shown that Medicaid expansion reduced hospital spending on uncompensated care. Objective:To measure the association of tax-exempt hospital spending with community benefit and changes in uncompensated care after Medicaid expansion. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cohort study was performed using a difference-in-differences analysis (ie, a pre-post treatment-control design) to estimate changes in reported charitable categories associated with Medicaid expansion. Data from Internal Revenue Service form 990, Schedule H, tax filings for 2253 tax-exempt hospitals in the United States from 2012 to 2016 were used. Data were analyzed from June to November 2019. Exposure:The proportion of the hospital's tax filing that spanned the period after Medicaid expansion. Main Outcomes and Measures:Hospital-reported spending on uncompensated care, unreimbursed Medicaid expenses, and other community benefit spending categories. Results:Across 2253 hospitals, mean (SD) uncompensated care costs between 2012 and 2016 were $4.20 million ($8.80 million) and unreimbursed Medicaid expenses were $7.60 million ($18.62 million). Compared with tax-exempt hospitals in states that did not expand Medicaid, those in states that did expand Medicaid reported mean reductions in their provision of uncompensated care of $1.11 million (95% CI, $0.35 million to $1.87 million; P?<?.001), representing a mean change of -2% (95% CI, -6% to 2%; P?<?.001). These reductions have been offset by mean reported increases in the provision of unreimbursed Medicaid expenses of $1.63 million (95% CI, $0.31 million to $2.94 million; P?=?.02), representing a mean increase of 2% (95% CI, 1% to 4%; P?=?.01). Tax-exempt hospitals in states that expanded Medicaid reported no statistically significant mean increase in spending on other community benefit activities. Conclusions and Relevance:In this study, large decreases in uncompensated care among tax-exempt hospitals associated with Medicaid expansion were not accompanied by increases in other reportable categories of community health benefit spending. Instead, they were accompanied by increased spending on unreimbursed Medicaid expenses.