Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Analytical quantification of aortic valve 18F-sodium fluoride PET uptake.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Challenges to cardiac PET-CT include patient motion, prolonged image acquisition and a reduction of counts due to gating. We compared two analytical tools, FusionQuant and OsiriX, for quantification of gated cardiac 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-fluoride) PET-CT imaging. METHODS:Twenty-seven patients with aortic stenosis were included, 15 of whom underwent repeated imaging 4 weeks apart. Agreement between analytical tools and scan-rescan reproducibility was determined using the Bland-Altman method and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). RESULTS:Image analysis was faster with FusionQuant [median time (IQR) 7:10 (6:40-8:20) minutes] compared with OsiriX [8:30 (8:00-10:10) minutes, p?=?.002]. Agreement of uptake measurements between programs was excellent, CCC?=?0.972 (95% CI 0.949-0.995) for mean tissue-to-background ratio (TBRmean) and 0.981 (95% CI 0.965-0.997) for maximum tissue-to-background ratio (TBRmax). Mean noise decreased from 11.7% in the diastolic gate to 6.7% in motion-corrected images (p?=?.002); SNR increased from 25.41 to 41.13 (p?=?.0001). Aortic valve scan-rescan reproducibility for TBRmax was improved with FusionQuant using motion correction compared to OsiriX (error?±?36% vs?±?13%, p?

SUBMITTER: Massera D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6541558 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7590213 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7218698 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7063623 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7188711 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6225539 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5068186 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7076301 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7235917 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3717002 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6340866 | biostudies-other