Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To review the relative cost-effectiveness of allografts and autografts in reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament.Methods
Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Results
The available evidence does not show any significant difference in clinical effectiveness between autografts and allografts. Given that, only a cost analysis is provided, which shows that allografts are more costly.Conclusion
Given the lack of any benefit of allografts over autografts, autografts should be preferred on cost grounds, if available. However, there may be situations where an allograft is indicated, for example, in multiple ligament reconstructions.Level of evidence
IV.
SUBMITTER: Waugh N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6541577 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Waugh Norman N Mistry Hema H Metcalfe Andrew A Colquitt Jill J Loveman Emma E Royle Pamela P Smith Nick A NA
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA 20190322 6
<h4>Purpose</h4>To review the relative cost-effectiveness of allografts and autografts in reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament.<h4>Methods</h4>Systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.<h4>Results</h4>The available evidence does not show any significant difference in clinical effectiveness between autografts and allografts. Given that, only a cost analysis is provided, which shows that allografts are more costly.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Given the lack of any benefit of allografts ...[more]