Dataset Information

Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, registration and construction of patient specific meshes.

ABSTRACT: Integrating spatial information about atrial physiology and anatomy in a single patient from multimodal datasets, as well as generalizing these data across patients, requires a common coordinate system. In the atria, this is challenging due to the complexity and variability of the anatomy. We aimed to develop and validate a Universal Atrial Coordinate (UAC) system for the following applications: combination and assessment of multimodal data; comparison of spatial data across patients; 2D visualization; and construction of patient specific geometries to test mechanistic hypotheses. Left and right atrial LGE-MRI data were segmented and meshed. Two coordinates were calculated for each atrium by solving Laplace's equation, with boundary conditions assigned using five landmark points. The coordinate system was used to map spatial information between atrial meshes, including scalar fields measured using different mapping modalities, and atrial anatomic structures and fibre directions from a reference geometry. Average error in point transfer from a source mesh to a destination mesh and back again was less than 0.1 mm for the left atrium and 0.02 mm for the right atrium. Patient specific meshes were constructed using the coordinate system and phase singularity density maps from arrhythmia simulations were visualised in 2D. In conclusion, we have developed a universal atrial coordinate system allowing automatic registration of imaging and electroanatomic mapping data, 2D visualisation, and patient specific model creation.

SUBMITTER: Roney CH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6543067 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, registration and construction of patient specific meshes.

Roney Caroline H CH Pashaei Ali A Meo Marianna M Dubois Rémi R Boyle Patrick M PM Trayanova Natalia A NA Cochet Hubert H Niederer Steven A SA Vigmond Edward J EJ

Medical image analysis 20190417

Integrating spatial information about atrial physiology and anatomy in a single patient from multimodal datasets, as well as generalizing these data across patients, requires a common coordinate system. In the atria, this is challenging due to the complexity and variability of the anatomy. We aimed to develop and validate a Universal Atrial Coordinate (UAC) system for the following applications: combination and assessment of multimodal data; comparison of spatial data across patients; 2D visuali ...[more]

PMID: 31026761

Similar Datasets

Project description:The quality of adaptive treatment planning depends on the accuracy of its underlying deformable image registration (DIR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of two DIR algorithms, B?spline?based deformable multipass (DMP) and deformable demons (Demons), implemented in a commercial software package. Evaluations were conducted using both computational and physical deformable phantoms. Based on a finite element method (FEM), a total of 11 computational models were developed from a set of CT images acquired from four lung and one prostate cancer patients. FEM generated displacement vector fields (DVF) were used to construct the lung and prostate image phantoms. Based on a fast?Fourier transform technique, image noise power spectrum was incorporated into the prostate image phantoms to create simulated CBCT images. The FEM?DVF served as a gold standard for verification of the two registration algorithms performed on these phantoms. The registration algorithms were also evaluated at the homologous points quantified in the CT images of a physical lung phantom. The results indicated that the mean errors of the DMP algorithm were in the range of 1.0~3.1mm for the computational phantoms and 1.9 mm for the physical lung phantom. For the computational prostate phantoms, the corresponding mean error was 1.0–1.9 mm in the prostate, 1.9–2.4 mm in the rectum, and 1.8–2.1 mm over the entire patient body. Sinusoidal errors induced by B?spline interpolations were observed in all the displacement profiles of the DMP registrations. Regions of large displacements were observed to have more registration errors. Patient?specific FEM models have been developed to evaluate the DIR algorithms implemented in the commercial software package. It has been found that the accuracy of these algorithms is patient?dependent and related to various factors including tissue deformation magnitudes and image intensity gradients across the regions of interest. This may suggest that DIR algorithms need to be verified for each registration instance when implementing adaptive radiation therapy. PACS numbers: 87.10.Kn, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr, 87.57.nj

Project description:The quality of adaptive treatment planning depends on the accuracy of its underlying deformable image registration (DIR). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of two DIR algorithms, B-spline-based deformable multipass (DMP) and deformable demons (Demons), implemented in a commercial software package. Evaluations were conducted using both computational and physical deformable phantoms. Based on a finite element method (FEM), a total of 11 computational models were developed from a set of CT images acquired from four lung and one prostate cancer patients. FEM generated displacement vector fields (DVF) were used to construct the lung and prostate image phantoms. Based on a fast-Fourier transform technique, image noise power spectrum was incorporated into the prostate image phantoms to create simulated CBCT images. The FEM-DVF served as a gold standard for verification of the two registration algorithms performed on these phantoms. The registration algorithms were also evaluated at the homologous points quantified in the CT images of a physical lung phantom. The results indicated that the mean errors of the DMP algorithm were in the range of 1.0 ~ 3.1 mm for the computational phantoms and 1.9 mm for the physical lung phantom. For the computational prostate phantoms, the corresponding mean error was 1.0-1.9 mm in the prostate, 1.9-2.4mm in the rectum, and 1.8-2.1 mm over the entire patient body. Sinusoidal errors induced by B-spline interpolations were observed in all the displacement profiles of the DMP registrations. Regions of large displacements were observed to have more registration errors. Patient-specific FEM models have been developed to evaluate the DIR algorithms implemented in the commercial software package. It has been found that the accuracy of these algorithms is patient dependent and related to various factors including tissue deformation magnitudes and image intensity gradients across the regions of interest. This may suggest that DIR algorithms need to be verified for each registration instance when implementing adaptive radiation therapy.

Project description:All fields of neuroscience that employ brain imaging need to communicate their results with reference to anatomical regions. In particular, comparative morphometry and group analysis of functional and physiological data require coregistration of brains to establish correspondences across brain structures. It is well established that linear registration of one brain to another is inadequate for aligning brain structures, so numerous algorithms have emerged to nonlinearly register brains to one another. This study is the largest evaluation of nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to brain image registration ever conducted. Fourteen algorithms from laboratories around the world are evaluated using 8 different error measures. More than 45,000 registrations between 80 manually labeled brains were performed by algorithms including: AIR, ANIMAL, ART, Diffeomorphic Demons, FNIRT, IRTK, JRD-fluid, ROMEO, SICLE, SyN, and four different SPM5 algorithms ("SPM2-type" and regular Normalization, Unified Segmentation, and the DARTEL Toolbox). All of these registrations were preceded by linear registration between the same image pairs using FLIRT. One of the most significant findings of this study is that the relative performances of the registration methods under comparison appear to be little affected by the choice of subject population, labeling protocol, and type of overlap measure. This is important because it suggests that the findings are generalizable to new subject populations that are labeled or evaluated using different labeling protocols. Furthermore, we ranked the 14 methods according to three completely independent analyses (permutation tests, one-way ANOVA tests, and indifference-zone ranking) and derived three almost identical top rankings of the methods. ART, SyN, IRTK, and SPM's DARTEL Toolbox gave the best results according to overlap and distance measures, with ART and SyN delivering the most consistently high accuracy across subjects and label sets. Updates will be published on the http://www.mindboggle.info/papers/ website.

Dataset Information

Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, registration and construction of patient specific meshes.

Publications

Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, registration and construction of patient specific meshes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets