Dataset Information

A comparison between non-sedation and general endotracheal anesthesia for retrograde endoscopic common bile duct stone removal: A tertiary center experience.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Conscious sedation is not routinely administered for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in many countries. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the safety and rate of success and complications during common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction using ERCPs performed with no-sedation (NS) or under general endotracheal anesthesia (GET). METHODS:The medical records of all patients who underwent ERCP for biliary stone extraction between January 2010 and September 2013 were reviewed, and patients classified to the NS and GET groups. The primary outcomes were the rate of success of complete stone removal and rate of complications, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, bleeding, pneumonia, and mortality within 30 days post-ERCP. Operative time was recorded for analysis. RESULTS:During the study period, 630 patients underwent ERCP, 402 with NS and 105 with GET. Among the 402 patients in the NS group, 37 (9.2%) could not complete the procedure due to an inability to tolerate the procedure. The success rate of complete stone extraction was higher among patients in the GET group than the NS group (94.3% versus 75.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). The rate of contrast injection into the pancreatic duct was higher for the NS than GET group (24.9% versus 15.2%, respectively; p = 0.008). Although non-significant, there was a higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in the NS than in the GET group (10.4% versus 5.7%, respectively; p = 0.105), while the incidence of pneumonia was higher for the GET group. Biliary pancreatitis, contrast injection into the pancreatic duct and an operation time ?30 min were independent risks factors for PEP. CONCLUSIONS:ERCP under GET is effective for CBD stone removal, but with slightly higher pneumonia rate after the procedure than non-sedated ERCP.

SUBMITTER: Liang CM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6543493 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparison between non-sedation and general endotracheal anesthesia for retrograde endoscopic common bile duct stone removal: A tertiary center experience.

Liang Chih-Ming CM Kuo Chung-Mou CM Lu Lung-Sheng LS Wu Cheng-Kun CK Tsai Cheng-En CE Kuo Ming-Te MT Chiu Yi-Chun YC Tai Wen-Chen WC Kuo Yuan-Hung YH Kuo Chung-Huang CH Chuah Seng-Kee SK Changchien Chi-Sin CS

Biomedical journal 20190401 2

<h4>Background</h4>Conscious sedation is not routinely administered for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in many countries. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the safety and rate of success and complications during common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction using ERCPs performed with no-sedation (NS) or under general endotracheal anesthesia (GET).<h4>Methods</h4>The medical records of all patients who underwent ERCP for biliary stone extraction betwee ...[more]

PMID: 31130249

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with stone extraction and papillotomy with subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy-the two-step approach-is the standard treatment of common bile duct stones in many countries. However, ERC is associated with a high risk of complications and more than half of patients require multiple ERCs. Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials find no major differences of the two-step approach in comparison with laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative laparoscopic stone clearance-the one-step approach. Currently, there are insufficient data to ascertain superiority.MethodsThe preGallstep trial is an investigator-initiated, multicentre randomised feasibility and pilot clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. Eligible patients are patients with common bile duct stones (identified by magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography), age 18 years or above with the possibility to perform both interventions within a reasonable time. We intent to randomise 150 participants allocated 1:1. The experimental intervention is the one-step approach. This consists of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The control intervention is the two-step approach which consists of ERC plus sphincterotomy (first step) and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (second step). Feasibility outcomes include the proportion of eligible patients not wanting to participate, reasons for rejection to participate, difficulties during the informed consent procedure, difficulties with randomisation, difficulties with data management, difficulties with blinding patient charts and forms and difficulties with maintaining blinding for the outcome assessors. The primary pilot outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one postoperative complication according to the Clavien-Dindo score grade II and above until 90 days after randomisation. This outcome will be used for a future sample size calculation of a larger pragmatic trial. Further, a range of clinical explorative outcomes will be assessed.DiscussionAs no sample size is estimated in this trial, there is a risk of wrongly assessing the effect on the patient-related outcome. The surgical procedures cannot be blinded. However, blinding will be employed in all other aspects of the trial, including the establishment of a blinded outcome adjudication committee with three independent assessors. Heterogeneity in screening, randomisation, diagnostics, treatment procedures, interventions and follow-up across trial sites may cause challenges in conducting a larger pragmatic trial. To monitor inter-site differences, we have implemented a central data monitoring scheme.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identification: NCT04801238 , Registered on 16 March 2021.

Project description:Introduction: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are a health concern for 10–20% of individuals with symptomatic gallstones, leading to health complications and placing a burden on healthcare systems. This study was initiated to investigate the changes in microbiome compositions and the metabolic signature associated with CBD stones. The research approach integrated taxonomic and functional data with metabolomics data, complemented by in vivo experiments. Methods: In a single tertiary healthcare institution, a total of 25 patients were enrolled who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between February 2019 and January 2021. We harvested DNA from bile samples acquired from these individuals. The amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region was conducted through polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by sequencing. We utilized QIIME2 for a comprehensive data analysis. Furthermore, we performed a metabolomic analysis of the bile samples using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. For the assessment of functional gene enrichment, we employed MetaboAnalyst 5.0. Lastly, we executed in vivo experiments on C57BL/6 mice and undertook histological examinations of tissue samples. Results: Out of the 25 study subjects, 17 underwent ERCP due to CBD stones (the CBD stone group), while the remaining 8 had the procedure for different reasons (the non-CBD stone group). An alpha diversity analysis showed a significantly greater microbial diversity in the bile samples of the non-CBD stone group (p < 0.01), and a beta diversity analysis confirmed the greater microbial compositional abundance in the gut microbiomes in this group (p = 0.01). A taxonomic analysis revealed that the abundances of Enterococcaceae and Enterococcus were higher in the bile microbiomes of the CBD stone group. A metabolic profile analysis showed that the acetate, formate, and asparagine levels were higher in the CBD stone group. A pathway enrichment analysis showed the metabolic pathways (Arginine and Proline Metabolism, Aspartate Metabolism, Glycine, and Serine Metabolism, and Ammonia Recycling pathways) that were associated with these differences. Preclinical experiments demonstrated systemic inflammation and extracellular trap formation in the CBD stone group. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of biliary dysbiosis and bile metabolites, specifically acetate and formate, in CBD stone development and progression. These findings have implications for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies using microbiomes for CBD stones.

Dataset Information

A comparison between non-sedation and general endotracheal anesthesia for retrograde endoscopic common bile duct stone removal: A tertiary center experience.

Publications

A comparison between non-sedation and general endotracheal anesthesia for retrograde endoscopic common bile duct stone removal: A tertiary center experience.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets