Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for Lymph Node Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF for lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB).

Methods

We searched databases for published reports. We reviewed the studies and identified the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF with respect to a composite reference standard (CRS) and culture. We used a bivariate random-effects model to perform meta-analyses and used metaregression to analyze sources of heterogeneity.

Results

15 independent studies compared Xpert MTB/RIF with CRS while 21 comparing it with culture were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF were 79% and 98% compared to that of CRS, respectively, and 84% and 91% compared to that of culture, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples versus CRS were 80% and 96%, whereas those against culture were 90% and 89%, respectively. The percentages while working with tissue samples versus CRS were 76% and 100%, respectively, whereas those against culture were 76% and 92%, respectively. There was no significant difference in diagnostic efficiency among the types of specimen.

Conclusions

Xpert MTB/RIF demonstrates good diagnostic efficiency for LNTB and is not related to the type of specimen, obtained via different routes.

SUBMITTER: Yu G 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6545759 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for Lymph Node Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yu Guocan G   Zhong Fangming F   Ye Bo B   Xu Xudong X   Chen Da D   Shen Yanqin Y  

BioMed research international 20190519


<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF for lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB).<h4>Methods</h4>We searched databases for published reports. We reviewed the studies and identified the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF with respect to a composite reference standard (CRS) and culture. We used a bivariate random-effects model to perform meta-analyses and used metaregression to analyze sources of heterogeneity.<h4>Results</h4>15 independent studies compared Xpert MTB/RIF with CRS while  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6705841 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7902353 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7417956 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8761404 | biostudies-literature