Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-Effectiveness of the US Food and Drug Administration Added Sugar Labeling Policy for Improving Diet and Health.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Excess added sugars, particularly from sugar-sweetened beverages, are a major risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration mandated the labeling of added sugar content on all packaged foods and beverages. Yet, the potential health impacts and cost-effectiveness of this policy remain unclear. METHODS:A validated microsimulation model (US IMPACT Food Policy model) was used to estimate cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus cases averted, quality-adjusted life-years, policy costs, health care, informal care, and lost productivity (health-related) savings and cost-effectiveness of 2 policy scenarios: (1) implementation of the US Food and Drug Administration added sugar labeling policy (sugar label), and (2) further accounting for corresponding industry reformulation (sugar label+reformulation). The model used nationally representative demographic and dietary intake data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, disease data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wonder Database, policy effects and diet-disease effects from meta-analyses, and policy and health-related costs from established sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis accounted for model parameter uncertainties and population heterogeneity. RESULTS:Between 2018 and 2037, the sugar label would prevent 354?400 cardiovascular disease (95% uncertainty interval, 167?000-673?500) and 599?300 (302?400-957?400) diabetes mellitus cases, gain 727?000 (401?300-1?138?000) quality-adjusted life-years, and save $31 billion (15.7-54.5) in net healthcare costs or $61.9 billion (33.1-103.3) societal costs (incorporating reduced lost productivity and informal care costs). For the sugar label+reformulation scenario, corresponding gains were 708?800 (369?200-1?252?000) cardiovascular disease cases, 1.2 million (0.7-1.7) diabetes mellitus cases, 1.3 million (0.8-1.9) quality-adjusted life-years, and $57.6 billion (31.9-92.4) and $113.2 billion (67.3-175.2), respectively. Both scenarios were estimated with >80% probability to be cost saving by 2023. CONCLUSIONS:Implementing the US Food and Drug Administration added sugar labeling policy could generate substantial health gains and cost savings for the US population.

SUBMITTER: Huang Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6546520 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-Effectiveness of the US Food and Drug Administration Added Sugar Labeling Policy for Improving Diet and Health.

Huang Yue Y   Kypridemos Chris C   Liu Junxiu J   Lee Yujin Y   Pearson-Stuttard Jonathan J   Collins Brendan B   Bandosz Piotr P   Capewell Simon S   Whitsel Laurie L   Wilde Parke P   Mozaffarian Dariush D   O'Flaherty Martin M   Micha Renata R  

Circulation 20190415 23


<h4>Background</h4>Excess added sugars, particularly from sugar-sweetened beverages, are a major risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration mandated the labeling of added sugar content on all packaged foods and beverages. Yet, the potential health impacts and cost-effectiveness of this policy remain unclear.<h4>Methods</h4>A validated microsimulation model (US IMPACT Food Policy model) was u  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5727294 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8481648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2882677 | biostudies-literature