Dataset Information

Reinforcement of patient education improved physicians' adherence to guideline-recommended medical therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Prescription of guideline-recommended medicines after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been suboptimal. Tools for improving the use of medications have been developed, but they mainly targeted physicians.

Objective

We evaluated the effects of reinforcement of patient and family education on the usage of guideline-recommended secondary prevention medications.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry of patients with ACS who were admitted to a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan between February 2015 and April 2017. The control group included 76 patients discharged before implementing the electronic-based patient and family education (PFE) system. The intervention group included 206 patients discharged after implementation. The primary outcome was the prescription rate of all four guideline-recommended drugs. Predictors of adherence were also evaluated.

Results

The study cohort included 282 ACS patients (188 men and 94 women) with a mean age of 68.5 years (standard deviation, 14.2). The intervention group patients were younger, had more family history of premature cardiovascular disease, more dyslipidemia, and underwent more reperfusion therapy. The intervention group was prescribed more guideline-recommended drugs than the control group: dual antiplatelet agents, 79.61% vs. 47.37% (p<0.001); statins, 74.76% vs. 34.21% (p<0.001); beta-blockers, 81.07% vs. 46.05% (p<0.001); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, 62.62% vs. 38.16% (p<0.001); and a combination of all four medications, 39.32% vs. 14.47% (p<0.001). After adjusting baseline variables, the PFE system remained a significant contributor to adherence to these drugs use (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Reinforcement of patient education was associated with significant improvements in physicians' adherence to guideline-recommended medical therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

SUBMITTER: Lee CK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6553689 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reinforcement of patient education improved physicians' adherence to guideline-recommended medical therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

Lee Chih-Kuo CK Lai Chao-Lun CL Lee Ming-Hsien MH Su Fang-Ying FY Yeh Tzu-Shan TS Cheng Li-Ying LY Hsieh Mu-Yang MY Wu Yen-Wen YW Liu Yen-Bin YB Wu Chih-Cheng CC

PloS one 20190606 6

<h4>Background</h4>Prescription of guideline-recommended medicines after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been suboptimal. Tools for improving the use of medications have been developed, but they mainly targeted physicians.<h4>Objective</h4>We evaluated the effects of reinforcement of patient and family education on the usage of guideline-recommended secondary prevention medications.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry of patients with ACS who ...[more]

PMID: 31170175

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdherence to cancer screening is important for cancer survivors because they are at high risk of subsequent cancer diagnoses or recurrence. We assessed adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-(CRC)-screening guidelines and evaluated demographic disparities among a population-based sample of survivors.MethodsA representative sample of Utah survivors diagnosed from 2012-2018 with any reportable invasive cancer was selected from central cancer registry records for a survey about survivorship needs. We estimated the proportion of eligible survivors adhering to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force screening guidelines and calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were age-adjusted and weighted to account for sample design and nonresponse.ResultsAnd 1421 survivors completed the survey (57.2% response rate). Screening adherence was 74.4% for breast, 69.4% for cervical, and 79.7% for CRC. Rural residents were more likely to adhere to breast cancer screening than urban residents (86.1% vs. 72.7%; adjusted RR = 1.19, CI = 1.05, 1.36). Higher educational attainment was associated with increased adherence to cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Younger age was associated with greater adherence to cervical cancer screening (p = 0.006) but lower adherence to CRC screening (p = 0.003). CRC screening adherence was lower among the uninsured and those without a primary care provider (45.6%) compared to those with a regular provider (83.0%; adjusted RR = 0.57, CI = 0.42, 0.79).ConclusionsSurveys based on samples from central cancer registries can provide population estimates to inform cancer control. Findings demonstrate work is needed to ensure all Utah cancer survivors obtain recommended cancer screenings. Efforts should focus particularly on increasing uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening and reducing demographic disparities in CRC screening.PrecisDespite high risk for subsequent cancer diagnosis, Utah cancer survivors are not all obtaining recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings. This presents a significant healthcare gap.

Project description:ImportanceDepression is associated with increased risk of primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Medication adherence may play an essential role.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of depression and 12-month adherence to guideline-directed medical therapies (eg, antiplatelet agents, β-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors [ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers], and statins) following percutaneous coronary intervention.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included individuals who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. Data were collected from a large US health claims database and analyzed between February and August 2022.Main outcomes and measuresProportion of days covered (PDC) for classes of guideline-directed medical therapies, with 12-month adherence categorized as adequate (PDC ≥80% to <90%) or optimal (PDC ≥90%). Multivariable-adjusted regression models were used to evaluate the association of depression with adherence; models incorporated demographic characteristics, comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions, depression treatment, and guideline-directed medical therapy treatment adjustment. The hypothesis was that those with depression would have lower odds of either adequate or optimal adherence to agents essential for guideline-directed medical therapy.ResultsOf 124 443 individuals (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [10.6] years; 41 430 [33.3%] female sex; 3694 [3.0%] Asian, 12 611 [10.1%] Black, and 12 337 [9.9%] Hispanic individuals) who received percutaneous coronary interventions, 20 711 (16.6%) had a diagnosis of depression. Those with depression were significantly less likely to obtain adequate 12-month adherence to antiplatelets (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85), β-blockers (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88), and statins (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.93) than those without depression; there was no association between depression and adherence to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00). Those with depression had similarly decreased likelihood of optimal 12-month adherence to antiplatelets, β-blockers, and statins as well as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, patients with depression were less likely to achieve adequate or optimal adherence to medications essential to guideline-directed medical therapies following percutaneous coronary intervention compared with those without depression. Recognition of depression may facilitate targeted interventions to address medication adherence and thereby improve secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Project description:BackgroundThe ultimate goal of any prescribed medical therapy is to achieve desired outcomes of patient care. However, patient nonadherence has long been a major problem detrimental to patient health and, thus, is a concern for all health care providers. Moreover, nonadherence is extremely costly for global medical systems because of unnecessary complications and expenses. Traditional patient education programs often serve as an intervention tool to increase patients' self-care awareness, disease knowledge, and motivation to change patient behaviors for better adherence. Patient trust in physicians, patient-physician relationships, and quality of communication have also been identified as critical factors influencing patient adherence. However, little is known about how mobile patient education technologies help foster patient adherence.ObjectiveThis study aimed to empirically investigate whether and how a mobile patient education system (MPES) juxtaposed with patient trust can increase patient adherence to prescribed medical therapies.MethodsThis study was conducted based on a field survey of 125 patients in multiple states in the United States who have used an innovative mobile health care system for their health care education and information seeking. Partial least squares techniques were used to analyze the collected data.ResultsThe results revealed that patient-physician communication and the use of an MPES significantly increase patients' trust in their physicians. Furthermore, patient trust has a prominent effect on patient attitude toward treatment adherence, which in turn influences patients' behavioral intention and actual adherence behavior. Based on the theory of planned behavior, the results also indicated that behavioral intention, response efficacy, and self-efficacy positively influenced patients' actual treatment adherence behavior, whereas descriptive norms and subjective norms do not play a role in this process.ConclusionsOur study is one of the first that examines the relationship between patients who actively use an MPES and their trust in their physicians. This study contributes to this context by enriching the trust literature, addressing the call to identify key patient-centered technology determinants of trust, advancing the understanding of patient adherence mechanisms, adding a new explanation of the influence of education mechanisms delivered via mobile devices on patient adherence, and confirming that the theory of planned behavior holds in this patient adherence context.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:Opioid-related deaths continue to increase in North America, an epidemic that was initiated by high rates of opioid prescribing. We designed a multifaceted, theory-informed Opioid Self-Assessment (OSA) package, to increase adherence to the Canadian Opioid Guideline among family physicians. This study aimed to assess changes in Canadian family physicians' knowledge and practices after completing the OSA package. DESIGN:We conducted a mixed-method evaluation using a pre-test and post-test design that involved the collection of both qualitative and quantitative data. SETTING:This research was conducted in the primary care setting in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS:We recruited a purposive sample of nine family physicians in Ontario who use long-term opioid therapy to treat patients with chronic pain. INTERVENTIONS:The OSA package included four components: an online knowledge test, an online learning programme, a safe medication practice self-assessment questionnaire and chart audit with feedback. OUTCOME MEASURES:Our measures included changes in knowledge, opioid safety practices and physicians' perspectives on the OSA package. RESULTS:We found statistically significant improvements between pre-test and post-test knowledge scores at both baseline and 6-month follow-up. Physicians' scores improved significantly on five of the seven core characteristics of the practice self-assessment questionnaire. On the chart audits, we observed an improvement in patient education between baseline and 6?months. Qualitative interviews showed that participants appreciated embedded resources in the OSA package. The completion of the package stimulated identification of gaps or deficits in practice and served as a useful reminder to discuss risk and safety with patients. Participants described the chart review as helpful in prompting discussions with their patients, identifying deficits and strengths and a 'primary motivator' for project participation. CONCLUSIONS:The OSA package has the potential to improve medication safety practices in primary care related to opioid monitoring and adherence to current opioid guidelines.

Project description:BackgroundPhysicians who hold medical disability assessment interviews (social insurance physicians) are probably influenced by stereotypes of claimants, especially because they have limited time available and they have to make complicated decisions. Because little is known about the influences of stereotyping on assessment interviews, the objectives of this paper were to qualitatively investigate: (1) the content of stereotypes used to classify claimants with regard to the way in which they communicate; (2) the origins of such stereotypes; (3) the advantages and disadvantages of stereotyping in assessment interviews; and (4) how social insurance physicians minimise the undesirable influences of negative stereotyping.MethodsData were collected during three focus group meetings with social insurance physicians who hold medical disability assessment interviews with sick-listed employees (i.e. claimants). The participants also completed a questionnaire about demographic characteristics. The data were qualitatively analysed in Atlas.ti in four steps, according to the grounded theory and the principle of constant comparison.ResultsA total of 22 social insurance physicians participated. Based on their responses, a claimant's communication was classified with regard to the degree of respect and acceptance in the physician-claimant relationship, and the degree of dominance. Most of the social insurance physicians reported that they classify claimants in general groups, and use these classifications to adapt their own communication behaviour. Moreover, the social insurance physicians revealed that their stereotypes originate from information in the claimants' files and first impressions. The main advantages of stereotyping were that this provides a framework for the assessment interview, it can save time, and it is interesting to check whether the stereotype is correct. Disadvantages of stereotyping were that the stereotypes often prove incorrect, they do not give the complete picture, and the claimant's behaviour changes constantly. Social insurance physicians try to minimise the undesirable influences of stereotypes by being aware of counter transference, making formal assessments, staying neutral to the best of their ability, and being compassionate.ConclusionsWe concluded that social insurance physicians adapt their communication style to the degree of respect and dominance of claimants in the physician-claimant relationship, but they try to minimise the undesirable influences of stereotypes in assessment interviews. It is recommended that this issue should be addressed in communication skills training.

Dataset Information

Reinforcement of patient education improved physicians' adherence to guideline-recommended medical therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Reinforcement of patient education improved physicians' adherence to guideline-recommended medical therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets