Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
We analyzed the preference of three psychological intervention formats-individual, group, and online-in a sample of 267 patients with a primary diagnosis of emotional disorder in Spanish public mental health settings.Method
We studied patients' preferences considering sociodemographic characteristics, diagnoses, history of psychological treatments, number of sessions, and satisfaction with past interventions.Results
Most participants (85.4%) preferred psychological treatment in an individual format, 14.2% in group, and 0.4% online. When comparing the people who chose individual and group treatment, no demographic or clinical differences were found. The arguments against group format were the lack of privacy and expression difficulties. Regarding online format, these included being considered impersonal and ineffective.Conclusion
The rejection of group and online psychotherapy formats allows us to define the actions we should carry out in public mental health settings to improve the acceptance of more cost-effective therapy formats.
SUBMITTER: Osma J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6557569 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Osma Jorge J Suso-Ribera Carlos C Peris-Baquero Óscar Ó Gil-Lacruz Marta M Pérez-Ayerra Luisa L Ferreres-Galan Vanesa V Torres-Alfosea Mª Ángeles MÁ López-Escriche María M Domínguez Olga O
PloS one 20190610 6
<h4>Objective</h4>We analyzed the preference of three psychological intervention formats-individual, group, and online-in a sample of 267 patients with a primary diagnosis of emotional disorder in Spanish public mental health settings.<h4>Method</h4>We studied patients' preferences considering sociodemographic characteristics, diagnoses, history of psychological treatments, number of sessions, and satisfaction with past interventions.<h4>Results</h4>Most participants (85.4%) preferred psychologi ...[more]