Dataset Information

Randomized Evaluation of Anagliptin vs Sitagliptin On low-density lipoproteiN cholesterol in diabetes (REASON) Trial: A 52-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

ABSTRACT: Additional reductions in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) via antidiabetic therapies should be considered in statin-using patients with sub-optimal LDL-C levels. We compared the efficacy of anagliptin and sitagliptin, two antidiabetic therapies, in reducing LDL-C in type 2 diabetic patients. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial was conducted at 17 centres in Japan between April 2015 and January 2018. Adults (age ?20 years) with type 2 diabetes, any atherosclerotic vascular lesions, and statin prescriptions were included. Anagliptin or sitagliptin were administered for 52 weeks. Primary and secondary endpoints were changes in LDL-C and haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels, respectively. We assessed the superiority (primary endpoint) and non-inferiority (secondary endpoint) of anagliptin over sitagliptin. This study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02330406). Of 380 participants, 353 were eligible and randomized. Mean participant age was 68 years, and 61% were males. Baseline median LDL-C and HbA1c were 108?mg/dL and 6.9%, respectively. Changes in LDL-C were -3.7?mg/dL with anagliptin and +2.1?mg/dL with sitagliptin at 52 weeks, and the estimated treatment difference was a significant -4.5?mg/dL (P?=?0.01 for superiority). Changes in HbA1c were +0.02% with anagliptin and +0.12% with sitagliptin (P?

SUBMITTER: Morimoto T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6561974 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Randomized Evaluation of Anagliptin vs Sitagliptin On low-density lipoproteiN cholesterol in diabetes (REASON) Trial: A 52-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Morimoto Takeshi T Sakuma Ichiro I Sakuma Mio M Tokushige Akihiro A Natsuaki Masahiro M Asahi Tomohiro T Shimabukuro Michio M Nomiyama Takashi T Arasaki Osamu O Node Koichi K Ueda Shinichiro S

Scientific reports 20190612 1

Additional reductions in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) via antidiabetic therapies should be considered in statin-using patients with sub-optimal LDL-C levels. We compared the efficacy of anagliptin and sitagliptin, two antidiabetic therapies, in reducing LDL-C in type 2 diabetic patients. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial was conducted at 17 centres in Japan between April 2015 and January 2018. Adults (age ≥20 years) with type 2 diabetes, any atherosclerotic vascular l ...[more]

PMID: 31189978

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDaprodustat is an oral agent that stimulates erythropoiesis by inhibiting the prolyl hydroxylases which mark hypoxia-inducible factor for degradation through hydroxylation. Its safety and efficacy (noninferiority) were assessed in this 52-week, open-label study.MethodsJapanese patients not on dialysis (ND) (N = 299) with anemia of CKD (stages G3, G4, and G5) with iron parameters of ferritin >100 ng/mL or transferrin saturation >20% at screening were randomized to daprodustat or epoetin beta pegol (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator [CERA], also known as methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta). After initiation of the study, the daprodustat starting dose for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naïve participants was revised, and daprodustat was started at 2 or 4 mg once daily depending on baseline hemoglobin. ESA users switched to daprodustat 4 mg once daily. CERA was started at 25 μg every 2 weeks for ESA-naïve patients and 25-250 μg every 4 weeks for ESA users based on previous ESA dose. In both treatment groups, dose was adjusted every 4 weeks based on hemoglobin level and changed according to a prespecified algorithm. The primary endpoint was mean hemoglobin level during weeks 40-52 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. ESA-naïve patients who entered before the protocol amendment revising the daprodustat starting dose were excluded from the ITT population.ResultsMean hemoglobin levels during weeks 40-52 were 12.0 g/dL in the daprodustat group (n = 108; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8-12.1) and 11.9 g/dL for CERA (n = 109; 95% CI 11.7-12.0); the difference between the groups was 0.1 g/dL (95% CI -0.1 to 0.3 g/dL). The lower limit of the 95% CI of the difference was greater than the prespecified margin of -1.0 g/dL. The mean hemoglobin level was within the target range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) during weeks 40-52 for 92% of participants in both groups. There was no meaningful difference in the frequencies of adverse events.ConclusionsOral daprodustat was noninferior to CERA in achieving and maintaining target hemoglobin levels in Japanese ND patients. Daprodustat was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified.

Dataset Information

Randomized Evaluation of Anagliptin vs Sitagliptin On low-density lipoproteiN cholesterol in diabetes (REASON) Trial: A 52-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Publications

Randomized Evaluation of Anagliptin vs Sitagliptin On low-density lipoproteiN cholesterol in diabetes (REASON) Trial: A 52-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets