Dataset Information

The emergence of new antidepressants for clinical use: Agomelatine paradox versus other novel agents.

ABSTRACT: This study was designed with the rational aim of discussing the emerging antidepressant agents that are likely to bring positive landmark, tremendous improvement and significant impact to the management of patients with depression disorders. It also elaborates on the Agomelatine paradox vis-a-vis the other novel antidepressant agents. The emerging antidepressants are: selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) such as bifemelane, pirlindole, toloxatone, selegiline, rasagiline and safinamide; serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) such as ansofaxine, nefopam and levomilnacipran; norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs) such as Reboxetine, viloxazine, teniloxazine (also known as sulfoxazine or sufoxazine), and atomoxetine; Vilazodone (a serotonin 5-HT1A autoreceptor partial agonist with serotonin reuptake inhibition [SPARI]); Vortioxetine (a serotonin receptors antagonist with serotonin reuptake inhibition [SARI]); atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, lurasidone, aripiprazole and brexpiprazole; N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-glutamatergic neurotransmission system blockers such as ketamine, CP-101,606 (traxoprodil), GLYX-13 (rapastinel), NRX-1074 (Apimostinel) and Riluzole. While Agomelatine (a melatonergic MT 1 and MT 2 receptors agonist and a selective serotonergic 5-HT 2B and 5-HT 2C receptors antagonist [MASSA]) remains a paradoxical agent that doesn't fit into any of the currently available classes of antidepressant agents and its pharmacological properties also deemed it unfit and inappropriate to be classified into another separate novel class of antidepressants contrary to the reports published in previous reference literatures. Lastly, this review remarkably advocates for the incorporation of the atypical antipsychotics and NMDA-glutamatergic ionoceptor blockers as new member classes of the antidepressant agents because of their clinically significant roles in the management of depression disorders.

SUBMITTER: Fasipe OJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6562183 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The emergence of new antidepressants for clinical use: Agomelatine paradox versus other novel agents.

Fasipe Olumuyiwa John OJ

IBRO reports 20190109

This study was designed with the rational aim of discussing the emerging antidepressant agents that are likely to bring positive landmark, tremendous improvement and significant impact to the management of patients with depression disorders. It also elaborates on the Agomelatine paradox vis-a-vis the other novel antidepressant agents. The emerging antidepressants are: selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) such as bifemelane, pirlindole, toloxatone, selegiline, rasagiline and safinamide; ...[more]

PMID: 31211282

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) constitutes an important public health problem, as it is highly prevalent in the industrialized world and it is associated with substantial economic consequences for patients, health care providers, insurance and social security organizations and employers. To conduct an economic evaluation comparing agomelatine with other commonly used alternatives for treating patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in Greece.MethodsAn existing international Markov model designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of agomelatine was adapted to the Greek setting. It reflects six different health states, in which patients may move on a monthly basis. The analysis was undertaken from a societal perspective. Transition probabilities, utilities and costs assigned to each health state were extracted from the published literature, government sources and expert opinion. Data reflects the year 2012 and was discounted using a rate of 3.5%. Probabilistic analysis was undertaken to deal with uncertainty.ResultsBase case analyses revealed that agomelatine is a dominant therapy for MDD relative to escitalopram, fluoxetine and sertraline, and it appeared to be cost-effective compared to venlafaxine (ICER: €547/QALY). Agomelatine remained a dominant treatment against generic sertraline and fluoxetine, and it appeared to be a cost-effective alternative compared to generic venlafaxine and escitalopram (ICER: €1,446/QALY and €3,303/QALY, respectively). Excluding the indirect cost from the analysis, agomelatine remained a cost-effective alternative over all comparators. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis agomelatine was dominant in 44.5%, 89.6%, 70.6% and 84.6% of simulated samples against branded venlafaxine, escitalopram, fluoxetine and sertraline, respectively.ConclusionThe present evaluation indicates that agomelatine is either a dominant or a cost-effective alternative relative to branded or generic alternatives, in Greece.

Project description:After more than half a century of modern psychopharmacology, with billions of dollars spent on antidepressants annually world-wide, we lack good evidence to guide our everyday decisions in conducting antidepressant treatment of patients with major depression. First we did not know which antidepressant to use as first line treatment. Second we do not know which dosage we should be aiming at with that antidepressant. Because more than half of the patients with major depression starting treatment do not remit after adequate trial with the first agent, they will need a second line treatment. Dose escalation, augmentation and switching are the three often recommended second line strategies but we do not know which is better than the others. Moreover, we do not know when to start considering this second line treatment.The recently published multiple-treatments meta-analysis of 12 new generation antidepressants has provided some partial answers to the first question. Starting with these findings, this proposed trial aims to establish the optimum 1st line and 2nd line antidepressant treatment strategy among adult patients with a non-psychotic unipolar major depressive episode.SUN(^_^)D, the Strategic Use of New generation antidepressants for Depression, is an assessor-blinded, parallel-group, multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Step I is a cluster-randomised trial comparing titration up to the minimum vs maximum of the recommended dose range among patients starting with sertraline. The primary outcome is the change in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 scores administered by a blinded rater via telephone at week 1 through 3. Step II is an individually randomised trial comparing staying on sertraline, augmentation of sertraline with mirtazapine, and switching to mirtazapine among patients who have not remitted on the first line treatment by week 3. The primary outcome is the change in the PHQ-9 scores at week 4 through 9. Step III represents a continuation phase to Steps I and II and aims to establish longer-term effectiveness and acceptability of the above-examined treatment strategies up to week 25. The trial is supported by the Grant-in-Aid by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.SUN(^_^)D promises to be a pragmatic large trial to answer important clinical questions that every clinician treating patients with major depression faces in his/her daily practices concerning its first- and second-line treatments.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01109693.

Dataset Information

The emergence of new antidepressants for clinical use: Agomelatine paradox versus other novel agents.

Publications

The emergence of new antidepressants for clinical use: Agomelatine paradox versus other novel agents.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets