Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.


ABSTRACT: A colonoscopy is considered to be the standard diagnostic test used to detect early colorectal lesions. Detection rates are expected to improve with optimised visualisation. A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate detection efficiency in several colonoscopic modalities. Relevant articles were identified in searches of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. The modalities, comprising of standard-definition white light (SDWL), high-definition white light (HDWL), narrow-band imaging (NBI), autofluorescence imaging (AFI), PENTAX image enhanced technology (i-SCAN), Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE), dye-based chromoendoscopy and novel image enhanced systems, including blue laser imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI), were compared to identify the most efficient modalities that could be used to detect colorectal lesions. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. As a result, 40 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, in the network meta-analyses, NBI (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.58), FICE (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.77), chromoendoscopy (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22-1.93) and AFI (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.07-2.87) were significantly better compared with SDWL at identifying adenoma in patients, and chromoendoscopy also proved significantly superior to HDWL (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.60). In pairwise analyses, it was demonstrated that chromoendoscopy was significantly superior to HDWL at detecting the number of polyps (MD, -1.11; 95% CI, -1.46, -0.76) and flat lesions (MD, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.49, -0.10) per subject. Additionally, FICE detected a significantly greater number of subjects with polyps (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96) and NBI was significantly better at detecting the number of subjects with flat lesions (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99) compared with HDWL. Based on the meta-analysis, NBI, FICE and AFI were significantly better compared with SDWL at detecting patients with adenoma. Additionally, chromoendoscopy was significantly better than SDWL and HDWL at detecting the number of colorectal adenoma, however additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

SUBMITTER: Li L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6566047 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Li Lifu L   Ou Yinghua Y   Yue Hui H   Sun Hong H   Chen Peisheng P   Liu Suying S   He Fengjian F   Peng Qianqian Q   Deng Sanhua S  

Experimental and therapeutic medicine 20190430 1


A colonoscopy is considered to be the standard diagnostic test used to detect early colorectal lesions. Detection rates are expected to improve with optimised visualisation. A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate detection efficiency in several colonoscopic modalities. Relevant articles were identified in searches of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. The modalities, comprising of standard-definition white light (SDWL), high-definition white light  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10117900 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6954227 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7695518 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7373514 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10826962 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8925947 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8244024 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7696506 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10517502 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3866267 | biostudies-literature