Dataset Information

Arteriovenous conduits for hemodialysis: how to better modulate the pathophysiological vascular response to optimize vascular access durability.

ABSTRACT: Vascular access is the lifeline for patients on hemodialysis. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred vascular access, but AVF maturation failure remains a significant clinical problem. Currently, there are no effective therapies available to prevent or treat AVF maturation failure. AVF maturation failure frequently results from venous stenosis at the AVF anastomosis, which is secondary to poor outward vascular remodeling and excessive venous intimal hyperplasia that narrows the AVF lumen. Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are the next preferred vascular access when an AVF creation is not possible. AVG failure is primarily the result of venous stenosis at the vein-graft anastomosis, which originates from intimal hyperplasia development. Although there has been advancement in our knowledge of the pathophysiology of AVF maturation and AVG failure, this has not translated into effective therapies for these two important clinical problems. Further work will be required to dissect out the mechanisms of AVF maturation failure and AVG failure to develop more specific therapies. This review highlights the major recent advancements in AVF and AVG biology, reviews major clinical trials, and discusses new areas for future research.

SUBMITTER: Shiu YT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6580244 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Arteriovenous conduits for hemodialysis: how to better modulate the pathophysiological vascular response to optimize vascular access durability.

Shiu Yan-Ting YT Rotmans Joris I JI Geelhoed Wouter Jan WJ Pike Daniel B DB Lee Timmy T

American journal of physiology. Renal physiology 20190220 5

Vascular access is the lifeline for patients on hemodialysis. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred vascular access, but AVF maturation failure remains a significant clinical problem. Currently, there are no effective therapies available to prevent or treat AVF maturation failure. AVF maturation failure frequently results from venous stenosis at the AVF anastomosis, which is secondary to poor outward vascular remodeling and excessive venous intimal hyperplasia that narrows the AVF lume ...[more]

PMID: 30785348

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveAs the proportion of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) compared with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in the United States has increased, there has been a concurrent increase in interventions. We explored AVF and AVG maturation and maintenance procedural burden in the first year of hemodialysis.Study designObservational cohort study.Setting & participantsPatients initiating hemodialysis from July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014, and having a first-time AVF or AVG placement between dialysis initiation and 1 year (N = 73,027), identified using the US Renal Data System (USRDS).PredictorsPatient characteristics.OutcomeSuccessful AVF/AVG use and intervention procedure burden.Analytical approachFor each group, we analyzed interventional procedure rates during maturation maintenance phases using Poisson regression. We used proportional rate modeling for covariate-adjusted analysis of interventional procedure rates during the maintenance phase.ResultsDuring the maturation phase, 13,989 of 57,275 patients (24.4%) in the AVF group required intervention, with therapeutic interventional requirements of 0.36 per person. In the AVG group 2,904 of 15,572 patients (18.4%) required intervention during maturation, with therapeutic interventional requirements of 0.28 per person. During the maintenance phase, in the AVF group 12,732 of 32,115 patients (39.6%) required intervention, with a therapeutic intervention rate of 0.93 per person-year. During maintenance phase, in the AVG group 5,928 of 10,271 patients (57.7%) required intervention, with a therapeutic intervention rate of 1.87 per person-year. For both phases, the intervention rates for AVF tended to be higher on the East Coast while those for AVG were more uniform geographically.LimitationsThis study relies on administrative data, with monthly recording of access use.ConclusionsDuring maturation, interventions for both AVFs and AVGs were relatively common. Once successfully matured, AVFs had lower maintenance interventional requirements. During the maturation and maintenance phases, there were geographic variations in AVF intervention rates that warrant additional study.

Project description:ImportanceInitial hemodialysis access with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with arteriovenous graft (AVG) and should be the procedure of choice whenever possible. To address the national underuse of AVF in the United States, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid has established an AVF goal of 66% or greater in 2009.ObjectiveTo explore contemporary practice patterns and physician characteristics associated with high AVG use compared with AVF use.Design, setting, and participantsThis review of 100% Medicare Carrier claims between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, includes both inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims data. All patients undergoing initial permanent hemodialysis access placement with an AVF or AVG were included. All surgeons performing more than 10 hemodialysis access procedures during the study period were analyzed.ExposuresPlacement of an AVF or AVG for initial permanent hemodialysis access.Main outcomes and measuresA surgeon-level AVG (vs AVF) use rate was calculated for all included surgeons. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient-level and surgeon-level factors associated with AVG use.ResultsA total of 85 320 patients (median age, 70 [range, 18-103] years; 47 370 men [55.5%]) underwent first-time hemodialysis access placement, of whom 66 489 (77.9%) had an AVF and 18 831 (22.1%) had an AVG. Among the 2397 surgeons who performed more than 10 procedures per year, the median surgeon level AVG use rate was 18.2% (range, 0.0%-96.4%). However, 498 surgeons (20.8%) had an AVG use rate greater than 34%. After accounting for patient characteristics, surgeon factors that were independently associated with AVG use included more than 30 years of clinical practice (vs 21-30 years; odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96]), metropolitan setting (odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.54]), and vascular surgery specialty (vs general surgery; odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.86]). Surgeons in the Northeast region had the lowest rate of AVG use (vs the South; odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96]). First-time hemodialysis access benchmarking reports for individual surgeons were created for potential distribution.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, one-fifth of surgeons had an AVG use rate above the recommended best practices guideline of 34%. Although some of these differences may be explained by patient referral practices, sharing benchmarked performance data with surgeons could be an actionable step in achieving more high-value care in hemodialysis access surgery.

Dataset Information

Arteriovenous conduits for hemodialysis: how to better modulate the pathophysiological vascular response to optimize vascular access durability.

Publications

Arteriovenous conduits for hemodialysis: how to better modulate the pathophysiological vascular response to optimize vascular access durability.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets