Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To investigate the effect of acetabular component orientation on the basic stress path above the acetabular dome in the recommended safe zone.Methods
A subject-specific normal hip finite element model was generated and a convergence study carried out to determine the number of material properties for trabecular bone using a normal hip model. Four abduction angles (35°, 40°, 45° and 50°) and four anteversion angles (10°, 15°, 20° and 25°) from the recommended safe zone of acetabular cup orientation were chosen to simulate acetabular reconstruction. The distribution and level of periacetabular stress was assessed using a normal hip model as a control and 16 reconstructed acetabula in simulated single-legged stances.Results
The error of the average stress between plans four and five (50 and 100 materials for trabecular bone respectively) was 4.8%, which is less than the previously defined 5% error. The effect of acetabular component orientation on stress distribution in trabecular bone was not pronounced. When the acetabular component was at 15° anteversion and the abduction angle was 40° or 45°, the stress level on posterolateral cortical bone above the acetabular dome was as stable as that in the normal hip model.Conclusions
Acetabular component orientation affects the basic stress path above the acetabular dome. Thus, orientation should be considered when attempting to restore normal biomechanics in the main load-bearing area.
SUBMITTER: Nie Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6583537 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Nie Yong Y Pei Fu-xing FX Li Zong-ming ZM
Orthopaedic surgery 20150201 1
<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the effect of acetabular component orientation on the basic stress path above the acetabular dome in the recommended safe zone.<h4>Methods</h4>A subject-specific normal hip finite element model was generated and a convergence study carried out to determine the number of material properties for trabecular bone using a normal hip model. Four abduction angles (35°, 40°, 45° and 50°) and four anteversion angles (10°, 15°, 20° and 25°) from the recommended safe zone o ...[more]