Dataset Information

Introduction of a three-dimensional computed tomography measurement method for acetabular fractures.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Acetabular fractures consist of complex fracture patterns whereby bone fragments are displaced in different directions. Two-dimensional computed tomography (2DCT) gap and step-off measurements tend to underestimate the multidirectional features of these fractures. The aim was to develop a three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurement method for acetabular fractures and validate whether this method will provide an observer independent fracture characterization.

Materials and methods

Sixty patients, operated for an acetabular fracture between 2007 and 2018, were included. The displacement was measured on the pre- and postoperative CT scans. Pre- and postoperative CT-based 3D models were made for each patient. Multiple 3D measurements, namely the 3D step-off, gap and the total gap area were introduced to quantify the preoperative and postoperative displacement. The Wilcoxon signed rank analysis was used to compare the 2DCT and 3DCT measurements.

Results

The preoperative displacement was significantly underestimated by 2DCT measurements in comparison with 3DCT measurements (2D vs. 3D; step-off 8 vs. 16 mm with P < 0.001; gap 19 vs. 21 mm with P = 0.001). The same applies to the postoperative residual displacement (2D vs. 3D; step-off 0 vs. 6 mm; gap 3 vs. 8 mm; P < 0.001). The total gap area, defined as the surface area between all fracture lines in the 3D model, was measured for each patient, resulting in a median value of 722 mm2 preoperatively and 168 mm2 postoperatively, with excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Conclusion

2DCT measurements tend to underestimate the initial and residual displacement in complex acetabular fractures. A 3DCT analysis of these injuries was developed to overcome this and should be used in addition to the Judet/Letournel and AO/OTA classification systems, in order to provide an observer independent quantifiable fracture description and accurate assessment of the fracture reduction.

SUBMITTER: Meesters AML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6583999 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDistal femur fractures are complex injuries with a high rate of fracture healing problems. Since the widespread of computed tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of distal femur fractures, many fracture characteristics have been discovered. This study aimed to depict the location and frequency of distal femur fracture lines and further analyze the morphological characteristics using the 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) mapping technique, thus providing more information to solve this challenging clinical problem.MethodsIn total, 217 distal femur fractures in 216 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Fracture fragments on CT were digitally reconstructed and virtually reduced to match a template model. The contour of every fracture fragment was then marked with smooth curves, and the overlap of all fracture lines allowed for the creation of 3-dimensional fracture maps and heat maps. Fracture characteristics were summarized based on these maps.ResultsThis study included 114 left knee injuries, 101 right knee injuries, and 1 case with bilateral injury. Distal femur fractures were most likely to occur among patients aged 61 to 70 years. On the heat map of all 217 fractures, fracture line hot zones were mainly concentrated around the metaphysis, the lateral part of the intercondylar notch, and the patellofemoral joint. Distal femur fractures with three Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) types demonstrated distinct fracture characteristics. In total, there were 58 coronal plane fractures (41.1%) in 141 intercondylar fractures.ConclusionsThe intercondylar fracture patterns in AO/OTA type B and type C fractures were similar, while the supracondylar characteristics in AO/OTA type A and type C were different. The findings in this study can help orthopaedic surgeons better understand the fracture morphology on the basis of AO/OTA classification. Further studies are needed to establish a standard biomechanical fracture model and new fixation strategy for better clinical outcomes.