Dataset Information

Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Aseptic loosening is one of the most elusive problems in total knee arthroplasty. We compared the failure rates of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty utilizing implants with hardened surface coating to a previous cohort of patients who underwent the procedure with traditional cruciate-retaining noncoated cobalt-chrome implants.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of 1099 total knee arthroplasties performed from 2009 to 2017. Two hundred forty-nine total knee arthroplasties performed from January 2015 to March 2017 under a single design were reviewed retrospectively and compared to the author's previous 850 total knee arthroplasties performed from January 2009 to December 2014 under a different design.

Results

This series demonstrated an alarming debonding of cement in the tibial implant. The resultant failure rate of 6% (P < .001) is higher than observed in 850 total knee arthroplasties in the previous 5 years and higher than those reported in the literature giving cause for concern regarding this implant.

Conclusions

Due to the observed excessive failure rate, the authors recommend exercising high levels of caution using this implant with hardened surface treatment until further testing can be ascertained as to the root cause of failure.

SUBMITTER: Lionberger D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6588685 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Lionberger David D Conlon Christopher C Wattenbarger Laura L Walker Timothy J TJ

Arthroplasty today 20190322 2

<h4>Background</h4>Aseptic loosening is one of the most elusive problems in total knee arthroplasty. We compared the failure rates of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty utilizing implants with hardened surface coating to a previous cohort of patients who underwent the procedure with traditional cruciate-retaining noncoated cobalt-chrome implants.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective study was conducted of 1099 total knee arthroplasties performed from 2009 to 2017. Two hundred fort ...[more]

PMID: 31286042

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeCruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised implant designs are available for primary total knee arthroplasty. However, whether the implant design is associated with a difference in the level of activity still remains unclear. This clinical trial compared posterior-stabilised and cruciate-retaining implants in sport-related patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, rate of return to sport, and weekly time dedicated to sport in active adults. It was also hypothesised that in young and active patients both implants lead to a similar rate of return to sport in terms of hours per week, type of sport, and joint mobility.MethodsAll patients were evaluated preoperatively and for a minimum of 36 months follow-up. The University of California Los Angeles activity scores, High-Activity Arthroplasty Score, and Visual Analogue Scale were administered preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The range of motion was investigated at admission and the last follow-up. Data concerning the hours per week dedicated to sports and the type of sport practiced were also collected at admission and at the last follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier Curve was performed to compare implant survivorship.ResultsData from 227 procedures (cruciate-retaining: 109, posterior-stabilised: 118) were prospectively collected. At the last follow-up, no difference was reported in The University of California Los Angeles activity scores (p = 0.6), High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (p = 0.1), Visual Analogue Scale (p = 0.9), flexion (p = 0.7) and extension (p = 0.4). No difference was found in the rate of return (p = 0.1) and weekly hours dedicated to sport (p = 0.3). The Kaplan-Meier curve evidenced no statistically significant difference in implant survivorship (p = 0.6).ConclusionsAt approximately five years of follow-up, no difference was reported between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilised implants in active adults in sport-related patient-reported outcomes measures, range of motion, pain, weekly time dedicated to sport, rate of return to sport, and implant survivorship.Level of evidenceLevel II, prospective study.

Dataset Information

Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets