Dataset Information

Effect of simulation education and case management on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The aim of the study was to investigate whether simulation education (SE) and case management had any effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients.

Methods

In this single center pilot trial, 100 T2DM patients who received medication and basic diabetes self-management education (DSME) were randomly divided into a control group (n = 50) and an experimental group (n = 50), who received SE and a case management program. Evaluation of biochemical indices was conducted at baseline and after 6 months. DSME consisted of 2-hour group trainings weekly for 2 consecutive weeks followed by 2 × 30 minute education sessions after 3 and 6 months. The SE program comprised additional 50-minute video sessions 3 times in the first week and twice in the second week. The experimental group was supervised by a nurse case manager, who followed up participants at least once a month, and who conducted group sessions once every 3 months, focusing on realistic aspects of physical activity and nutrition, with open discussions about setting goals and strategies to overcome barriers.

Results

After 6 months, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial blood glucose level improvements were superior in the experimental group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Self-care behavior adherence scores of healthy diet (P = 0.001), physical activity (P = 0.043), self-monitoring of blood glucose (P < 0.001), and reducing risks (P < 0.001) were significantly increased in the experimental group compared with the control group.

Conclusions

Simulation education and case management added to routine DSME effectively improved glycemic control in T2DM patients.

SUBMITTER: Ji H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6590464 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of simulation education and case management on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

Ji Hong H Chen Ronghao R Huang Yong Y Li Wenqin W Shi Chunhui C Zhou Juan J

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 20181221 3

<h4>Background</h4>The aim of the study was to investigate whether simulation education (SE) and case management had any effect on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients.<h4>Methods</h4>In this single center pilot trial, 100 T2DM patients who received medication and basic diabetes self-management education (DSME) were randomly divided into a control group (n = 50) and an experimental group (n = 50), who received SE and a case management program. Evaluation of biochemical indices was ...[more]

PMID: 30520255

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionIn low- to middle-income countries such as Vietnam, urgent measures are required to prevent and control type 2 diabetes and its complications. This study measured the effect of a 3-month patient education and self-management intervention in a low-resource setting on diabetes knowledge and levels of blood glucose control.MethodsThis was a single-center randomized controlled study among adult outpatients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were randomly assigned to 3-month community intervention consisting of group education for type 2 diabetes knowledge, diet, exercise in combination with usual diabetes care, or to usual diabetes care alone (control). Diabetes knowledge was measured with a modified Michigan University Diabetes Knowledge Test (MDKT). Other study outcomes included change in mean HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and systolic blood pressure (SBP).ResultsA total of 364 patients were randomized, 182 to the intervention group and 182 to control. The two groups were similar regarding main baseline characteristics. The male/female ratio was 45.1%/54.9% and mean age was 62.2 ± 9.3 years. Approximately half the patients (48.1%) were overweight and 15.7% were obese, mean baseline HbA1c was 8.21 ± 1.92%, and only 29.9% of participants had a baseline HbA1c < 7.0%. At baseline, diabetes knowledge was "very poor" or "poor" in 63.7% of patients. After a 3-month follow-up, the proportion achieving the target MDKT score increased from 37.4% to 81.3% in the intervention group and from 35.2% to 51.7% in the control (between-group difference P < 0.001). The estimate (SD) of the difference between intervention and control groups was - 1.63 (2.16), 95% CI - 2.07 to - 1.18. Mean changes from baseline HbA1c were - 0.54 ± 1.41% and - 0.18 ± 1.33% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = 0.012). Among those with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) at baseline, mean changes at 3 months were - 0.80 ± 1.52% vs 0.41 ± 1.47%, respectively, (P = 0.013). Statistically significant decreases in FBG and SBP were also observed in the intervention group at 3 months, but not in the control group. Multivariate analysis revealed the variables with the strongest influence on blood glucose control at 3 months were study group, baseline MDKT score, diabetes duration, and baseline HbA1c (all P ≤ 0.05).ConclusionProvision of a structured educational program to Vietnamese people living with type 2 diabetes is effective at improving disease knowledge and is associated with better glycemic control. Larger and longer-term studies are now warranted to confirm these findings.Trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered on 27 May 2020 through the https://clinicaltrials.gov site with the following identifier: NCT04403841.

Project description:Medical nutrition therapy is recognized as an important treatment option in type 2 diabetes. Most guidelines recommend eating a diet with a high intake of fiber-rich food including fruit. This is based on the many positive effects of fruit on human health. However some health professionals have concerns that fruit intake has a negative impact on glycemic control and therefore recommend restricting the fruit intake. We found no studies addressing this important clinical question. The objective was to investigate whether an advice to reduce the intake of fruit to patients with type 2 diabetes affects HbA1c, bodyweight, waist circumference and fruit intake.This was an open randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. The primary outcome was a change in HbA1c during 12 weeks of intervention. Participants were randomized to one of two interventions; medical nutrition therapy + advice to consume at least two pieces of fruit a day (high-fruit) or medical nutrition therapy + advice to consume no more than two pieces of fruit a day (low-fruit). All participants had two consultations with a registered dietitian. Fruit intake was self-reported using 3-day fruit records and dietary recalls. All assessments were made by the "intention to treat" principle.The study population consisted of 63 men and women with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. All patients completed the trial. The high-fruit group increased fruit intake with 125 grams (CI 95%; 78 to 172) and the low-fruit group reduced intake with 51 grams (CI 95%; -18 to -83). HbA1c decreased in both groups with no difference between the groups (diff.: 0.19%, CI 95%; -0.23 to 0.62). Both groups reduced body weight and waist circumference, however there was no difference between the groups.A recommendation to reduce fruit intake as part of standard medical nutrition therapy in overweight patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes resulted in eating less fruit. It had however no effect on HbA1c, weight loss or waist circumference. We recommend that the intake of fruit should not be restricted in patients with type 2 diabetes.http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT01010594.

Dataset Information

Effect of simulation education and case management on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of simulation education and case management on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure