Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Dimensional accuracy of cone beam CT with varying angulation of the jaw to the X-ray beam.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Cone beam CT (CBCT) machines do not always allow for patients to be scanned in the ideal position for image acquisition. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the position/angulation of the mandible relative to the X-ray beam of a CBCT machine. METHODS:Five sequential CBCT scans were captured of a human mandible at each angulation of 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° using a coronal and sagittal positioning. Inspection software utilized a best-fit alignment to automatically calculate the three-dimensional variation at 15 standardized points of interest. RESULTS:Statistically significant differences were found between the dimensional accuracy of CBCT scans taken at 10° (26.3 µm) of coronal angulation, as well as those taken at 20° (-17.3 mm) and 30° (35.2 mm) of sagittal angulations (p < 0.001, 0.016, and <0.001, respectively). The largest deviations in accuracy included an overall maximum deviation of 490 mm. CONCLUSIONS:The position of the mandible with respect to the X-ray beam has a clinically insignificant effect on dimensional accuracy, up to the maximum angle of 40° assessed.

SUBMITTER: Koch GK 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6592582 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Dimensional accuracy of cone beam CT with varying angulation of the jaw to the X-ray beam.

Koch George K GK   Hamilton Adam A   Wang Kelly K   Herschdorfer Laura L   Lee Kyu Ha KH   Gallucci German O GO   Friedland Bernard B  

Dento maxillo facial radiology 20181108 4


<h4>Objectives</h4>Cone beam CT (CBCT) machines do not always allow for patients to be scanned in the ideal position for image acquisition. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the position/angulation of the mandible relative to the X-ray beam of a CBCT machine.<h4>Methods</h4>Five sequential CBCT scans were captured of a human mandible at each angulation of 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° using a coronal and sagittal positioning. Inspection software utilized a best-fit alignment to automatic  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3699013 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3798334 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8460082 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4263642 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7807579 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3436920 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7807659 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3210190 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6181758 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7425566 | biostudies-literature