Dataset Information

Utility of CPR Machine Power and Change in Right Atrial Pressure for Estimating CPR Quality.

ABSTRACT: When a cardiac arrest occurs, it is necessary to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as soon as possible. This requires maintaining the pressure depth at 5 cm at a rate of 100 cpm. For CPR machines, which are frequently used in ambulances, the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not superior to that of manual CPR, although CPR machines can maintain the compression rate and reciprocal distance of the compression plate more accurately. When the thoracic cavity is deformed due to repeated chest compressions, CPR machines must be adjusted. It is necessary to develop a method for measuring whether adequate CPR is achieved using CPR machines. CPR was performed on two pigs with a CPR machine, commencing 1 minute after the heart was stopped. Four CPR modes were used, with compression rates of 60 or 100 cpm and compression depths of 3 or 5 cm. The CPR machine was equipped with a load cell for measuring compression force, and a potentiometer for measuring compression depth. The measurement results obtained from the sensor were used to calculate the frequency components. The compression force and depth data were used to calculate the mechanical power of the CPR machine and mechanical impedance of the thoracic cavity. Changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), carotid blood flow (CBF), and right atrial pressure (RAP) were measured during performance of CPR; change in RAP refers to variation therein with chest compressions. Continuous CPR in both animals resulted in deformation of the chest cavity and a steady decline in impedance. The correlation between CPR power and change in RAP was 0.78, and that between compression force and CBF was 0.64. Impedance was not correlated with blood pressure or CBF. When the condition of the animal deteriorated due to cardiac arrest, the CPP decreased and ETCO2 increased. The CPR power and RAP varied according to the CPR mode rather than the condition of the animal. Measuring the CPR machine power does not require a separate procedure, such as catheter intubation, so should be suitable as an index of the quality of CPR in emergency situations.

SUBMITTER: Lee DY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6592918 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesUpright computed tomography (CT) can detect slight changes particularly in the superior vena cava (SVC) volume in healthy volunteers under the influence of gravity. This study aimed to evaluate whether upright CT-based measurements of the SVC area are useful for assessing mean right atrial pressure (mRAP) in patients with heart failure.MethodsWe performed CT in both standing and supine positions to evaluate the SVC (directly below the junction of the bilateral brachiocephalic veins) and inferior vena cava (IVC; at the height of the diaphragm) areas and analyzed their relationship with mRAP, measured by right heart catheterization in 23 patients with heart failure.ResultsThe median age of enrolled patients was 60 (51-72) years, and 69.6% were male. The median mRAP was 3 (1-7) mmHg. The correlations between the standing position SVC and IVC areas and mRAP were stronger than those in the supine position (SVC, ρ = 0.68, p < 0.001 and ρ = 0.43, p = 0.040; IVC, ρ = 0.57, p = 0.005 and ρ = 0.46, p = 0.026; respectively). Furthermore, the SVC area in the standing position was most accurate in identifying patients with higher mRAP (> 5 mmHg) (SVC standing, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.00; SVC supine, AUC = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; IVC standing, AUC = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.55-0.98; IVC supine, AUC = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.49-0.94). The inter- and intraobserver agreements (evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients) for all CT measurements were 0.962-0.991.ConclusionsUpright CT-based measurement of the SVC area can be useful for non-invasive estimation of mRAP under the influence of gravity in patients with heart failure.Key points• This study showed that the superior vena cava (SVC) area in the standing position was most accurate in identifying patients with heart failure with higher mean right atrial pressure. • Upright computed tomography-based measurements of the SVC area can be a promising non-invasive method for estimating mean right atrial pressure under the influence of gravity in patients with heart failure. • Clinical management of patients with heart failure based on this non-invasive modality may lead to early assessment of conditional changes and reduced hospitalization for exacerbation of heart failure.

Project description:BackgroundWe have previously reported a simple correction method for estimating pleural pressure (Ppl) using central venous pressure (CVP). However, it remains unclear whether this method is applicable to patients with varying levels of intravascular volumes and/or chest wall compliance. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of our method under different conditions of intravascular volume and chest wall compliance.ResultsTen anesthetized and paralyzed pigs (43.2 ± 1.8 kg) were mechanically ventilated and subjected to lung injury by saline lung lavage. Each pig was subjected to three different intravascular volumes and two different intraabdominal pressures. For each condition, the changes in the esophageal pressure (ΔPes) and the estimated ΔPpl using ΔCVP (cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl) were compared to the directly measured change in pleural pressure (Δd-Ppl), which was the gold standard estimate in this study. The cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl was calculated as κ × ΔCVP, where "κ" was the ratio of the change in airway pressure to the change in CVP during the occlusion test. The means and standard deviations of the Δd-Ppl, ΔPes, and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl for all pigs under all conditions were 7.6 ± 4.5, 7.2 ± 3.6, and 8.0 ± 4.8 cmH2O, respectively. The repeated measures correlations showed that both the ΔPes and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl showed a strong correlation with the Δd-Ppl (ΔPes: r = 0.95, p < 0.0001; cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl: r = 0.97, p < 0.0001, respectively). In the Bland-Altman analysis to test the performance of the cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl to predict the Δd-Ppl, the ΔPes and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl showed almost the same bias and precision (ΔPes: 0.5 and 1.7 cmH2O; cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl: - 0.3 and 1.9 cmH2O, respectively). No significant difference was found in the bias and precision depending on the intravascular volume and intraabdominal pressure in both comparisons between the ΔPes and Δd-Ppl, and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl and Δd-Ppl.ConclusionsThe CVP method can estimate the ΔPpl with reasonable accuracy, similar to Pes measurement. The accuracy was not affected by the intravascular volume or chest wall compliance.

Dataset Information

Utility of CPR Machine Power and Change in Right Atrial Pressure for Estimating CPR Quality.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets