Dataset Information

Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to identify the influence of ambulatory status prior to treatment on survival of patients with spinal metastases. Two investigators independently retrieved relevant electronic literature in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, to identify eligible studies. Effect estimates for hazard risk (HR) were extracted and synthesized through fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified, with an accumulated number of 3962 participants. HR from 14 studies regarding comparison between ambulatory versus non-ambulatory groups were pooled using a random-effects model, and statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.34). In subgroups of mixed primary tumor and lung cancer, ambulatory status was considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P < 0.05), while in the subgroup of prostate cancer it was not (HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 0.79-3.74). HR from 4 studies related to comparison between Frankel E versus Frankel C-D were pooled using a fixed-effects model, which revealed statistical significance (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.36). Ambulatory status is a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases. However, in patients with primary prostate cancer, the prognostic effect of ambulatory status has not yet been confirmed to be significant.

SUBMITTER: Yang XG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6594537 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis.

Yang Xiong-Gang XG Han Yue Y Wang Feng F Liu Yong-Heng YH Hu Yong-Cheng YC Lun Deng-Xing DX Feng Jiang-Tao JT Hua Kun-Chi KC Yang Li L Zhang Hao H Xu Ming-You MY Zhang Hao-Ran HR

Orthopaedic surgery 20180821 3

This study was conducted to identify the influence of ambulatory status prior to treatment on survival of patients with spinal metastases. Two investigators independently retrieved relevant electronic literature in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, to identify eligible studies. Effect estimates for hazard risk (HR) were extracted and synthesized through fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified, with an accumulated number ...[more]

PMID: 30133148

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background contextLaboratory values have been found to be useful predictive measures of survival following surgery. The utility of laboratory values for prognosticating outcomes among patients with spinal metastases has not been studied.PurposeTo determine the prognostic capacity of laboratory values at presentation including white blood cell count, serum albumin and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with spinal metastases.Study designRetrospective review of records from two tertiary care centers (2005-2017).Patient samplePatients, aged 40 to 80, who received operative or nonoperative management for spinal metastases.Outcome measuresSurvival, complications, or hospital readmissions within 90 days of treatment and a composite measure for treatment failure accounting for changes in ambulatory function and mortality at 6 months following presentation.MethodsMultivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between laboratory values and length of survival, adjusting for confounders. Multivariable logistic regression was used in analyses related to 6-month and 1-year mortality, complications, readmissions, and treatment failure. A scoring rubric was developed based on the performance of laboratory values in the multivariable tests. Internal validation was performed using a bootstrap simulation that consisted of sampling with replacement and 1,000 replications.ResultsWe included 1,216 patients. Thirty-seven percent of patients received a surgical intervention and 63% were treated nonoperatively. Median survival for the cohort as a whole was 255 days (interquartile range 93-642 days). The PLR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29, 1.80; p<.001) and albumin (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.45, 0.64; p<.001) were significantly associated with survival, whereas WBC count (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86, 1.36; p=.50) was not associated with this outcome. Similar findings were encountered for 6-month and 1-year mortality as well as the composite measure for treatment failure. The PLR and albumin performed well in our scoring rubric and findings were preserved in the bootstrapping validation.ConclusionsIndividuals with low serum albumin and elevated PLR should be advised regarding the impact of these laboratory markers on outcomes including survival, irrespective of treatments received. An effort should also be made to optimize nutrition and PLR, if practicable, before treatment to minimize the potential for development of adverse events.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Cancer patients' survival time has obviously improved, with the development of systemic treatment techniques. However, the probability of metastases to the vertebrae has also been increased which makes some adverse effects on patients' quality of life. The prediction of survival plays a key role in choosing therapeutic modality, and Tokuhashi Score was established as one of the most commonly used predictive systems for spinal metastases. Thus, this study was conducted to identify the prognostic effect of factors involved in revised Tokuhashi Score (RTS). METHODS:Two investigators independently retrieved relevant literature on platforms of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We identified eligible studies through title/abstract and full-text perusing. Data was extracted including general information of studies, participants' characteristics, therapeutic modality, overall survival and prognostic effect of factors. Hazard ratio (HR) for each factor was synthesized if available through fixed- or random-effect models as appropriate. RESULTS:A total of 63 eligible studies with 10,411 participants were identified. Overall, cases with thyroid cancer had the highest survival rate, while the ones with non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma lived for the shorted survival time. Performance status, bone metastasis, number of involved vertebrae, visceral metastasis, primary tumor and neurological status were regarded as significant predictors in 71.4, 40.0, 18.2, 63.4, 73.1 and 44.7% of the involved studies respectively. Thirty-eight articles were included in meta-analysis, and prognostic effects of five factors (apart from primary tumor) were analyzed. Factors were all proved to be significant except comparisons between KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) 10-40 VS. 50-70 and single VS. multiple spinal metastases. CONCLUSION:All factors of RTS were significant on prognosis predicting and should be considered when choosing therapeutic modality for spinal metastases. What's more, we believe that more accurate prognosis may be obtained after removal of the cut-offs for KPS 10-40 VS. 50-70 and single VS. multiple involved vertebrae.

Project description:Study designRetrospective analysis of a registered cohort of patients treated and irradiated for metastases in the spinal column in a single institute.ObjectiveThis is the first study to develop and internally validate radiomics features for predicting six-month survival probability for patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM).Background dataExtracted radiomics features from routine clinical CT images can be used to identify textural and intensity-based features unperceivable to human observers and associate them with a patient survival probability or disease progression.MethodsA study was conducted on 250 patients treated for metastases in the spinal column irradiated for the first time between 2014 and 2016, at the MAASTRO clinic in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The first 150 available patients were used to develop the model and the subsequent 100 patient were considered as a test set for the model. A bootstrap (B = 400) stepwise model selection, which combines both the forward and backward variable elimination procedure, was used to select the most useful predictive features from the training data based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The stepwise selection procedure was applied to the 400 bootstrap samples, and the results were plotted as a histogram to visualize how often each variable was selected. Only variables selected more than 90 % of the time over the bootstrap runs were used to build the final model.A prognostic index (PI) called radiomics score (radscore) and clinical score (clinscore) was calculated for each patient. The prognostic index was not scaled, the original values were used which can be extracted from the model directly or calculated as a linear combination of the variables in the model multiplied by the respective beta value for each patient.ResultsThe clinical model had a good discrimination power. The radiomics model, on the other hand, had an inferior performance with no added predictive power to the clinical model. The internal imaging characteristics do not seem to have a value in the prediction of survival. However, the Shape features were excluded from further analyses in our study since all biopsies had a standard shape hence no variability.

Project description:Background: Isometric paravertebral muscle training (IPMT) may improve mobility, pain, and quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients with spinal metastases. However, this regimen remains unproven in patients with unstable spinal metastases (USM), a population at high risk for clinical exacerbation with such interventions. Thus, we conducted this exploratory, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial (NCT02847754) to evaluate the safety/feasibility of IPMT and secondarily assess pain, bone density, pathologic fracture rate, and QOL. Methods: All patients had histologically/radiologically confirmed USM (per Taneichi score) and underwent non-operative management with 5-10 fractions of palliative radiotherapy (RT). Randomization (1:1) groups were IPMT (intervention, INT) or muscle relaxation (control, CON); both lasted 15 min/day and started concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was feasibility (completion of training programs three months post-RT). Secondary endpoints were pain response (Visual Analog Scale) and opioid consumption, bone density and pathologic fracture rate, and QOL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC questionnaires). Results: Sixty patients were randomized and 56 received protocol therapy. Mean survival in both groups was 4.4 months. There were no adverse events with either training regimen. Altogether, ≥80% of the planned sessions were completed by 55% (n = 16/29) in CON and 67% (n = 18/27) in INT. Regarding the post-radiotherapy home-based training, ≥80% of planned sessions were completed by 64% (n = 9/14) of the INT cohort. There were no differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, or bone density between arms (p > 0.05 for all). No difference was observed between groups regarding new pathological fractures (INT: n = 1 vs. CON: n = 3) after three months (p = 0.419). There were no QOL differences between arms (all parameters p > 0.05). Conclusions: IPMT is potentially feasible for high-risk USM patients. Future trials adequately powered for relevant endpoints are thus recommended.

Project description:ObjectivesLung metastases from gynaecological tract cancers are rare, and prognostic factors are still undefined. The goal of this study was to analyse prognostic factors for survival in this group of patients.MethodsData of patients with lung metastases from gynaecological tract cancers who underwent surgical resections from 1 January 2005 to 31 May 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were treated surgically if the primitive tumour was under control and the lung was the only organ involved. Clinical and pathological data associated with metastatic patterns and previous treatment types were correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival using Kaplan-Meier curves, whereas the log-rank test was used to assess differences between subgroups.ResultsThe analysis was conducted on 55 patients. OS was 65% at 5 years. With univariable analysis, age >45 years (P = 0.022) and the absence of pleural infiltration (P = 0.001) were determined to be favourable prognostic factors. The 5-year OS was 69.9% versus 53.3% in patients with pleural involvement. Multivariable analysis confirmed the absence of pleural infiltration as a favourable independent prognostic factor; the hazard ratio was 0.06; the 95% confidence interval was 0.00-0.23 (P = 0.011).At univariable analysis, the absence of pleural infiltration was determined to be a favourable prognostic factor (P = 0.034) for disease-free survival. The numbers and dimensions of the metastases did not influence survival in these patients.In uterine cancers of endometrial or cervical origin, the presence of pleural infiltration (P = 0.001), lymph node involvement (P = 0.001) and young age (P = 0.044) were considered unfavourable prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionsSurgical treatment in technically resectable gynaecological tract metastases may represent an important option. Pleural infiltration and lymph node metastases seem to be adverse prognostic factors.

Dataset Information

Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis.

Publications

Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets