Dataset Information

Brugada syndrome in a young patient with type 1 myotonic dystrophy requiring an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background?

Cardiac electrical disturbances represent the most frequent cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy Type 1 (MD1). Limited data suggest that the prevalence of Brugada syndrome in MD1 may be increased compared to the general population.

Case summary?

We report a case of a 22-year-old asymptomatic man with repolarization abnormalities in leads V1-V3 suggestive of Type III Brugada pattern. The patient had a family history of MD and incidents of sudden death in relatives. Drug-induced Brugada Type 1 syndrome was revealed after procainamide challenge. A ventricular stimulation study was positive since a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced after two extrastimuli. The patient underwent implantation of a single chamber cardiac defibrillator (ICD). Eight months after the procedure he suffered an appropriate ICD shock due to rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

Discussion?

Brugada syndrome is linked with MD1. Potential life-threatening arrhythmias may develop in the adult life of MD1 patients. Electrocardiographic surveillance and tailored invasive treatment with ICDs can prevent sudden cardiac death in this setting.

SUBMITTER: Korantzopoulos P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6601169 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Brugada syndrome in a young patient with type 1 myotonic dystrophy requiring an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention: a case report.

Korantzopoulos Panagiotis P Bechlioulis Aris A Lakkas Lampros L Naka Katerina K KK

European heart journal. Case reports 20190601 2

<h4>Background</h4>Cardiac electrical disturbances represent the most frequent cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy Type 1 (MD1). Limited data suggest that the prevalence of Brugada syndrome in MD1 may be increased compared to the general population.<h4>Case summary</h4>We report a case of a 22-year-old asymptomatic man with repolarization abnormalities in leads V1-V3 suggestive of Type III Brugada pattern. The patient had a family history of MD and incidents of sudden death in relatives ...[more]

PMID: 31449644

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background One third of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients receive appropriate therapy, but all remain at risk of defibrillator complications. Information on these complications in contemporary cohorts is limited. This study assessed complications and their risk factors after defibrillator implantation in a Dutch nationwide prospective registry cohort and forecasts the potential reduction in complications under distinct scenarios of updated indication criteria. Methods and Results Complications in a prospective multicenter registry cohort of 1442 primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant patients were classified as major or minor. The potential for reducing complications was derived from a newly developed prediction model of appropriate therapy to identify patients with a low probability of benefitting from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. During a follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 2.0-2.6 years), 228 complications occurred in 195 patients (13.6%), with 113 patients (7.8%) experiencing at least one major complication. Most common ones were lead related (n=93) and infection (n=18). Minor complications occurred in 6.8% of patients, with lead-related (n=47) and pocket-related (n=40) complications as the most prevailing ones. A surgical reintervention or additional hospitalization was required in 53% or 61% of complications, respectively. Complications were strongly associated with device type. Application of stricter implant indication results in a comparable proportional reduction of (major) complications. Conclusions One in 13 patients experiences at least one major implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related complication, and many patients undergo a surgical reintervention. Complications are related to defibrillator implantations, and these should be discussed with the patient. Stricter implant indication criteria and careful selection of device type implanted may have significant clinical and financial benefits.

Project description:BackgroundThere are conflicting data on the impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks on subsequent mortality.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine whether the arrhythmic substrate leading to ICD therapy or the therapy itself increases mortality.MethodsThe study cohort included 5,516 ICD recipients who were enrolled in 5 landmark ICD trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-RISK, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, RAID). The authors evaluated the association of device therapy with subsequent mortality in 4 separate time-dependent models: model I, type of ICD therapy; model II, type of arrhythmia for which ICD therapy was delivered; model III, combined assessment of all arrhythmia and therapy types during follow-up; and model IV, incremental risk associated with repeated ICD shocks.ResultsWhen analyzed by the type of ICD therapy (model I), a first appropriate ICD shock was associated with increased risk of subsequent mortality with or without concomitant occurrence of inappropriate shock during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.78 and 2.31; p < 0.001 and p = 0.12), whereas inappropriate shock alone was not associated with mortality risk (HR: 1.23; p = 0.42). Similarly, ICD therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ≥200 beats/min or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (model II) was associated with increased risk of death with or without concomitant therapy for VT <200 beats/min (HRs: 2.25 and 2.62; both p < 0.001), whereas appropriate therapy for VT <200 beats/min or inappropriate therapy (regardless of etiology) did not reach statistical significance (all p > 0.10). Combined assessment of all therapy and arrhythmia types during follow-up (model III) showed that appropriate ICD shocks for VF, shocks for fast VT (≥200 beats/min) without prior antitachycardia pacing (ATP), as well as shocks for fast VT delivered after failed ATP, were associated with the highest risk of subsequent death (HR: all >2.8; p < 0.001). Finally, 2 or more ICD appropriate shocks were not associated with incremental risk to the first appropriate ICD shock (model IV).ConclusionThe combined data from 5 landmark ICD trials suggest that the underlying arrhythmic substrate rather than the ICD therapy is the more important determinant of mortality in ICD recipients.

Project description:There are limited data describing sex specificities regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the real-world European setting.Using a large multicenter cohort of consecutive patients referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention (2002-2012), in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, we examined the sex differences in subjects' characteristics and outcomes. Of 5539 patients, only 837 (15.1%) were women and 53.8% received cardiac resynchronization therapy. Compared to men, women presented a significantly higher proportion of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (60.2% versus 36.2%, P<0.001), wider QRS complex width (QRS >120 ms: 74.6% versus 68.5%, P=0.003), higher New York Heart Association functional class (≥III in 54.2%♀ versus 47.8%♂, P=0.014), and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (18.7% versus 24.9%, P<0.001). During a 16 786 patient-years follow-up, overall, fewer appropriate therapies were observed in women (hazard ratio=0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.76; P<0.001). By contrast, no sex-specific interaction was observed for inappropriate shocks (odds ratio ♀=0.84, 95% CI 0.50-1.39, P=0.492), early complications (odds ratio=1.00, 95% CI 0.75-1.32, P=0.992), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=0.87 95% CI 0.66-1.15, P=0.324). Analysis of sex-by- cardiac resynchronization therapy interaction shows than female cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients experienced fewer appropriate therapies than men (hazard ratio=0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.77; P<0.001) and lower mortality (hazard ratio=0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97; P=0.034).In our real-life registry, women account for the minority of ICD recipients and presented with a different clinical profile. Whereas female cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients had a lower incidence of appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause death than their male counterparts, the observed rates of inappropriate shocks and early complications in all ICD recipients were comparable.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01992458.

Dataset Information

Brugada syndrome in a young patient with type 1 myotonic dystrophy requiring an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention: a case report.

Background?

Case summary?

Discussion?

Publications

Brugada syndrome in a young patient with type 1 myotonic dystrophy requiring an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention: a case report.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets