Dataset Information

Patient and Provider Variables Associated with Variation in the Systemic Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:Six treatments have improved overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), each differing in toxicities and cost. This study identified patient and provider factors associated with variation in treatment of men with mCRPC to identify potential barriers to treatments. Methods:A claims database of commercially insured patients was used to identify patients with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, sipuleucel-T, or radium-223 between 2010 and 2016. Multinomial and binomial logistic regressions were conducted to determine patient and provider factors associated with treatment patterns. Results:Among 5,575 patients identified, patients with a household income >$99,000 were less likely to receive an expensive oral androgen signaling inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide) as first-line treatment versus docetaxel compared to patients with a household income <$50,000 (odds ratio, OR, 0.66, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.48-0.92). Patients who are Black (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01), live in the Pacific region versus the South Atlantic (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.74-4.11), received treatment from a urologist versus a medical oncologist (OR 16.05, 95% CI 6.01-42.86), or had pre-existing heart failure (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42) were more likely to receive first-line oral androgen signaling inhibitors over docetaxel, independent of other factors on multivariable analysis. Conclusion:Clinicians and policy makers should be aware of the potential barriers and provider factors that influence use of novel therapies among patients with advanced prostate cancer, including the paradoxical effect of income and the substantial effect of provider specialty on first-line treatment rendered to patients with mCRPC.

SUBMITTER: Caram MEV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6605774 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient and Provider Variables Associated with Variation in the Systemic Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Caram Megan E V MEV Wang Shikun S Tsao Phoebe P Griggs Jennifer J JJ Miller David C DC Hollenbeck Brent K BK Lin Paul P Mukherjee Bhramar B

Urology practice 20190701 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>Six treatments have improved overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), each differing in toxicities and cost. This study identified patient and provider factors associated with variation in treatment of men with mCRPC to identify potential barriers to treatments.<h4>Methods</h4>A claims database of commercially insured patients was used to identify patients with prostate cancer treated with abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazita ...[more]

PMID: 31276025

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRelatively little is known about the relationship between race/ethnicity and patient-reported outcomes after contemporary treatments for localized prostate cancer.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that treatment-related changes in urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal function vary by race/ethnicity.Design, setting, and participantsThe Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study is a prospective, population-based, observational study that enrolled 3708 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in 2011-2012.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisPatient-reported disease-specific function was measured using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) at baseline and 6 and 12 mo after enrollment. Mean treatment differences in function were compared by race using risk-adjusted generalized estimating equations.Results and limitationsWhile all race/ethnic groups reported considerable declines in scores for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (RP) when compared to active surveillance, African-American men reported a greater difference than white men did (adjusted difference-in-differences 8.4 points, 95% confidence interval 2.0-14.8; p=0.01). No difference in bother scores was noted and the overall proportion of explained variation attributable to race/ethnicity was relatively small in comparison to primary treatment and baseline function. No clinically significant racial variation was noted for the sexual, bowel, irritative voiding, or hormone domains. Limitations include the lack of well-established thresholds for clinical significance using the EPIC instrument.ConclusionWhile these data demonstrate that incontinence at 1 yr after RP may be worse for African-American compared to white men, the difference appears to be modest overall. Treatment selection and baseline function explain a much greater proportion of the variation in function after treatment.Patient summaryWe observed that the effect of treatment for prostate cancer on patient-reported function did not vary dramatically by race/ethnicity. Compared to white men, African-American men experienced a somewhat more pronounced decline in urinary continence after radical prostatectomy, but the corresponding changes in bother scores were not significantly different between the two groups.

Project description:BackgroundThe strong association between family history and prostate cancer (PCa) suggests a significant genetic contribution, yet specific highly penetrant PCa susceptibility genes have not been identified. Certain single-nucleotide-polymorphisms have been found to correlate with PCa risk; however uncertainty remains regarding their clinical utility and how to best incorporate this information into clinical decision-making. Genetic testing is available directly to consumers and both patients and healthcare providers are becoming more aware of this technology. Purchasing online allows patients to bypass their healthcare provider yet patients may have difficulty interpreting test results and providers may be called upon to interpret results. Determining optimal ways to educate both patients and providers, and strategies for appropriately incorporating this information into clinical decision-making are needed.MethodsA mixed-method study was conducted in Utah between October 2011 and December 2011. Eleven focus group discussions were held and surveys were administered to 23 first-degree relatives of PCa patients living in Utah and 24 primary-care physicians and urologists practicing in Utah to present specific information about these assessments and determine knowledge and attitudes regarding health implications of using these assessments.ResultsData was independently coded by two researchers (relative Kappa = .88; provider Kappa = .77) and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results indicated differences in attitudes and behavioral intentions between patient and provider. Despite the test's limitations relatives indicated interest in genetic testing (52%) while most providers indicated they would not recommend the test for their patients (79%). Relatives expected providers to interpret genetic test results and use results to provide personalized healthcare recommendations while the majority of providers did not think the information would be useful in patient care (92%) and indicated low-levels of genetic self-efficacy.ConclusionsAlthough similarities exist, discordance between provider and patient attitudes may influence the effective translation of novel genomic tests into clinical practice suggesting both patient and provider perceptions and expectations be considered in development of clinical decision-support tools.

Dataset Information

Patient and Provider Variables Associated with Variation in the Systemic Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Publications

Patient and Provider Variables Associated with Variation in the Systemic Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets