Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Digital recording and documentation of endoscopic procedures: physicians' practice and perspectives.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:In recent years, it has become increasingly prevalent internationally to record and archive digital recordings of endoscopic procedures. This emerging documentation tool raises weighty educational, ethical and legal issues - which are viewed as both deterrents and incentives to its adoption. We conducted a survey study aimed at evaluating the use of DRD in endoscopic procedures, to examine physicians' support of this practice and to map the considerations weighed by physicians when deciding whether or not to support a more extensive use of DRD. METHODS:Israeli physicians from specialties that employ endoscopic technics were surveyed anonymously for demographic background, existence and use of recording equipment, existence of institutional guidelines regarding DRD, and self-ranking (on a scale from 1 to 7) of personal attitudes regarding DRD. RESULTS:322 physicians were surveyed. 84% reported performing routine endoscopic procedures, 78% had the required equipment for digital recording, and 64% of them stated that they never or only rarely actually recorded the procedure. General surgeons had the second highest rate of DRD equipment (96.5%) but the lowest rates of DRD practice (17.5%). The average ranking of support of DRD by all participants was 5.07 ± 1.9, indicating a moderately high level of support. Significant positive correlation exists between actual DRD rates and average support of DRD (p 

SUBMITTER: Peled-Raz M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6607539 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Digital recording and documentation of endoscopic procedures: physicians' practice and perspectives.

Peled-Raz Maya M   Willner Nadav N   Shteinberg Dan D   Or-Chen Keren K   Rainis Tova T  

Israel journal of health policy research 20190702 1


<h4>Background</h4>In recent years, it has become increasingly prevalent internationally to record and archive digital recordings of endoscopic procedures. This emerging documentation tool raises weighty educational, ethical and legal issues - which are viewed as both deterrents and incentives to its adoption. We conducted a survey study aimed at evaluating the use of DRD in endoscopic procedures, to examine physicians' support of this practice and to map the considerations weighed by physicians  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8759928 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9342866 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7540913 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6765349 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6751766 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7548160 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8349503 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7416616 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10692495 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7651906 | biostudies-literature