Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Evaluation of options for presenting health-states from PROMIS® item banks for valuation exercises.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Health status descriptive systems based on item response theory (IRT), such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®), have item banks to measure domains of health. We developed a method to present such banks for health-state valuation. METHODS:We evaluated four different presentation approaches: a single item (1S), 2 items presented separately (2S), 2 items presented together (2T), or 5 items presented together (5T). We evaluated these four approaches in three PROMIS item banks (depression, physical function, and sleep disturbance). Adult community members valued health-state descriptions using the visual analog scale and standard gamble methods. We compared the approaches by the range of item bank theta scores captured, participants' assessments of difficulty (1?=?very easy to 7?=?very hard), and exit interviews. RESULTS:Participants (n?=?118) ranged in age from 18 to 71; 63% were female and 54% were white. The 1S approach captured the smallest range of theta scores. A monotonic relationship between theta score and mean standard gamble estimate was found with all approaches except 2S. Across all 3 item banks, mean difficulty assessments were 2.35 (1S), 2.69 (2T), 2.78 (5T), and 2.80 (2S). In exit interviews, participants generally found all four approaches similarly meaningful and realistic. CONCLUSIONS:Creating health descriptions by presenting 2 items maximized the range of theta while minimizing difficulty and maintaining a monotonic relationship with utility estimates. We recommend this approach for valuation of IRT-based descriptive systems such as PROMIS.

SUBMITTER: Hanmer J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6611549 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Evaluation of options for presenting health-states from PROMIS® item banks for valuation exercises.

Hanmer Janel J   Cella David D   Feeny David D   Fischhoff Baruch B   Hays Ron D RD   Hess Rachel R   Pilkonis Paul A PA   Revicki Dennis D   Roberts Mark M   Tsevat Joel J   Yu Lan L  

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 20180412 7


<h4>Purpose</h4>Health status descriptive systems based on item response theory (IRT), such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®), have item banks to measure domains of health. We developed a method to present such banks for health-state valuation.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated four different presentation approaches: a single item (1S), 2 items presented separately (2S), 2 items presented together (2T), or 5 items presented together (5T). We evaluated these four  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4902883 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6663945 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6761958 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4633351 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9398458 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6032515 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8595462 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8606028 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7561593 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8260648 | biostudies-literature