Dataset Information

Quantifying uncertainty about future antimicrobial resistance: Comparing structured expert judgment and statistical forecasting methods.

ABSTRACT: The increase of multidrug resistance and resistance to last-line antibiotics is a major global public health threat. Although surveillance programs provide useful current and historical information on the scale of the problem, the future emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is uncertain, and quantifying this uncertainty is crucial for guiding decisions about investment in antibiotics and resistance control strategies. Mathematical and statistical models capable of projecting future rates are challenged by the paucity of data and the complexity of the emergence and spread of resistance, but experts have relevant knowledge. We use the Classical Model of structured expert judgment to elicit projections with uncertainty bounds of resistance rates through 2026 for nine pathogen-antibiotic pairs in four European countries and empirically validate the assessments against data on a set of calibration questions. The performance-weighted combination of experts in France, Spain, and the United Kingdom projected that resistance for five pairs on the World Health Organization's priority pathogens list (E. coli and K. pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems and MRSA) would remain below 50% in 2026. In Italy, although upper bounds of 90% credible ranges exceed 50% resistance for some pairs, the medians suggest Italy will sustain or improve its current rates. We compare these expert projections to statistical forecasts based on historical data from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). Results from the statistical models differ from each other and from the judgmental forecasts in many cases. The judgmental forecasts include information from the experts about the impact of current and future shifts in infection control, antibiotic usage, and other factors that cannot be easily captured in statistical forecasts, demonstrating the potential of structured expert judgment as a tool for better understanding the uncertainty about future antibiotic resistance.

SUBMITTER: Colson AR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6611586 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantifying uncertainty about future antimicrobial resistance: Comparing structured expert judgment and statistical forecasting methods.

Colson Abigail R AR Megiddo Itamar I Alvarez-Uria Gerardo G Gandra Sumanth S Bedford Tim T Morton Alec A Cooke Roger M RM Laxminarayan Ramanan R

PloS one 20190705 7

The increase of multidrug resistance and resistance to last-line antibiotics is a major global public health threat. Although surveillance programs provide useful current and historical information on the scale of the problem, the future emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is uncertain, and quantifying this uncertainty is crucial for guiding decisions about investment in antibiotics and resistance control strategies. Mathematical and statistical models capable of projecting future rate ...[more]

PMID: 31276536

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (or one of its derivatives) is the primary clinical metric for characterizing sleep disordered breathing-the value of which with respect to a threshold determines severity of diagnosis and eligibility for treatment reimbursement. The index value, however, is taken as a perfect point estimate, with no measure of statistical uncertainty. Thus, current practice does not robustly account for variability in diagnosis/eligibility due to chance. In this paper, we quantify the statistical uncertainty associated with respiratory event indices for sleep disordered breathing and the effect of uncertainty on treatment eligibility.MethodsWe develop an empirical estimate of uncertainty using a non-parametric bootstrap on the interevent times, as well as a theoretical Poisson estimate reflecting the current formulation of the AHI. We then apply these methods to estimate AHI uncertainty for 2049 subjects (954/1095 M/F, age: mean 69 ± 9.1) from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).Results and conclusionsThe mean 95% empirical confidence interval width was 11.500 ± 6.208 events per hour and the mean 95% theoretical Poisson confidence interval width was 5.998 ± 2.897 events per hour, suggesting that uncertainty is likely a major confounding factor within the current diagnostic framework. Of the 278 subjects in the symptomatic population (ESS>10), 27% (76/278) had uncertain diagnoses given the 95% empirical confidence interval. Of the 2049 subjects in the full population, 43% (880/2049) had uncertain diagnoses given the 95% empirical confidence interval. The inclusion of subjects with uncertain diagnoses increases the number of eligible patients by 21.3% for the symptomatic population and by 84.8% for the full population. The exclusion of subjects with uncertain diagnoses given the 95% empirical confidence interval decreases the number of eligible patients by 12.4% for the symptomatic population and by 34.8% for full population. Additional analyses suggest that it is practically infeasible to gain diagnostic statistical significance through additional testing for a broad range of borderline cases. Overall, these results suggest that AHI uncertainty is a vital additional piece of information that would greatly benefit clinical practice, and that the inclusion of uncertainty in epidemiological analysis might help improve the ability for researchers to robustly link AHI with co-morbidities and long-term outcomes.

Project description:Background. Blood cannot be artificially manufactured, and there is currently no substitute for human blood. The supply of blood in transfusion facilities requires constant and timely collection of blood from donors. Modeling and forecasting trends in blood collections are critical for determining both the current and future capacity requirements and appropriate models of adequate blood provision. Objectives. The objective of this study is to determine blood collection or donation patterns and develop time-series models that can be updated and refined in predicting future blood donations in Zimbabwe when given the historical data. Materials and Methods. Monthly blood donation data for the period 2009 to 2019 were collected retrospectively from the National Blood Service Zimbabwe database. Time-series models (i.e., the Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average [SARIMA] and Error, Trend and Seasonal [ETS]) models were applied and compared. The models were chosen because of their ability to handle the seasonality and other time-series components evident in the blood donation data. Expert opinions and experience were used in selecting the models and in making inferences in the analysis. Results. Time-series plots of blood donations showed seasonal patterns, with significant drops in blood donations in months associated with Zimbabwe's school holidays (April, August, and December) and public holidays. During these holidays, there is a reduced number of school donors, while at about the same time, there is increasing blood demand as a result of road accidents. Model identification procedures established the SARIMA(1,1,2)(0,1,1)12 model as the appropriate model for forecasting total blood donation in Zimbabwe. The results and forecasts show an upward trend in blood donations. According to the accuracy measures used, the SARIMA model outperforms the ETS model. Conclusions. Expert knowledge in the blood donation process, coupled with statistical models, can help explain trends exhibited in blood donation data in Zimbabwe. These findings help the blood authorities plan for blood donor campaign drives. The findings are key indicators of where to allocate more resources toward blood donation and when to collect more blood units. The increasing blood donation projections ensure a stable blood bank inventory in the near future.HighlightsA SARIMA model can be used to predict the flow of blood donations in Zimbabwe.The seasonal blood donation pattern peaks in the months of March, June/July, and September.The donations troughs are in the months of April, August, December, and January. These are the months coinciding with school holidays in Zimbabwe.Both the SARIMA and ETS models provided similar forecasts, but measures of fit and expert knowledge gave a slight preference to the SARIMA(1,1,2)(0,1,1)12 model in predicting the flow of blood donations in Zimbabwe.These model results are useful for guiding allocation of blood donation resources and blood donation drive timing.

Dataset Information

Quantifying uncertainty about future antimicrobial resistance: Comparing structured expert judgment and statistical forecasting methods.

Publications

Quantifying uncertainty about future antimicrobial resistance: Comparing structured expert judgment and statistical forecasting methods.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets