Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
We treated proximal tibia fractures according to our own CT based classification in which we divided these fractures into different varus and valgus fractures. We also provide a guide for reduction of these fractures and the sequence in which different fractured fragments of proximal tibia should be fixed.Materials and methods
Patients were identified from the hospital records, treated according to classification based upon mechanism of injury, from August 2014 to December 2016. Patients were called for follow up in outpatient department for evaluation. Functional evaluation was done according to Rasmussen functional grading score.Results
Twenty one patients of proximal tibia fracture were treated between august 2014 to December 2016 according to our method. There were 17 male and 4 female. Age ranged from 20 year to 65 year (average 35.19 year). 17 patients were turned up for latest follow up who were analysed for Rasmusssen functional grading score. 14 patients had excellent and 3 patients had good function according to Rasmussen functional grading score.Conclusions
Our classification system provides a guide for reduction of proximal tibia fractures and also tells us the sequence of different fracture fragments.
SUBMITTER: Soni A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6611915 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul-Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Soni Ashwani A Gupta Ravi R Gupta Sandeep S Kansay Rajeev R Kapoor Love L
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 20180807 4
<h4>Introduction</h4>We treated proximal tibia fractures according to our own CT based classification in which we divided these fractures into different varus and valgus fractures. We also provide a guide for reduction of these fractures and the sequence in which different fractured fragments of proximal tibia should be fixed.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Patients were identified from the hospital records, treated according to classification based upon mechanism of injury, from August 2014 to De ...[more]