Dataset Information

Comparison of electrical impedance tomography and intracranial pressure during dehydration treatment of cerebral edema.

ABSTRACT: Cerebral edema after brain injury can lead to brain damage and death if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. This study investigates the feasibility of employing electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as a non-invasive imaging tool for monitoring the development of cerebral edema, in which impedance imaging of the brain related to brain water content is compared with intracranial pressure (ICP). We enrolled forty patients with cerebral hemorrhage who underwent lateral external ventricular drain with intraventricular ICP and EIT monitoring for 3 h after initiation of dehydration treatment. The average reconstructed impedance value (ARV) calculated from EIT images was compared with ICP. Dehydration effects induced changes in ARV and ICP showed a close negative correlation in all patients, and the mean correlation reached R² = 0.78 ± 0.16 (p < .001). A regression equation (R² = 0.62, p < .001) was formulated from the total of measurement data. The 95% limits of agreement were - 6.13 to 6.13 mmHg. Adaptive clustering and variance analysis of normalized changes in ARV and ICP showed 92.5% similarity and no statistically significant differences (p > .05). Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of changes in ICP >10 mmHg were 0.65, 0.73 and 0.70 respectively. The findings show that EIT can monitor changes in brain water content associated with cerebral edema, which could provide a real-time and non-invasive imaging tool for early identification of cerebral edema and the evaluation of mannitol dehydration.

SUBMITTER: Yang B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6612924 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Animal trials contribute to major achievements in medical science. The so-called lavage model is frequently used to evaluate ventilation strategies in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). But, the lavage model itself might have systematic impacts on EIT parameters. Therefore, we established an additional experimental model, in which ARDS is caused by intravenously administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In this study, we want to examine if EIT measurements provide consistent results in both experimental models or whether the pathophysiology of the model influences the findings. Overall, we want to compare both experimental models regarding clinical parameters and EIT-derived indices, namely the global inhomogeneity (GI) index and the regional ventilation delay (RVD) index. METHODS:Nineteen pigs were included in this study, allocated to the control group (CO; n = 5), lavage group (LAV; n = 7) and LPS group (LPS; n = 7). After baseline measurements and the establishment of ARDS, assessment of respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, gas exchange and EIT recordings were performed hourly over eight hours. RESULTS:In both experimental ARDS models, EIT measurements provided reliable results. But, the GI and the RVD index did not show consistent results as compared to the CO group. Initially, GI and RVD index were higher in the LAV group but not in the LPS group as compared to the CO group. This effect disappeared during the study. Furthermore, the GI index and the RVD index were higher in the LAV group compared to the LPS group in the beginning as well. This, once again, disappeared. Clinical lung injury parameters remained more stable when using LPS. CONCLUSION:The two models showed quite different influences on the GI and RVD index. This implies, that the underlying pathophysiology affects EIT parameters and thus the findings. Hence, translation to EIT-guided clinical therapy in humans suffering from ARDS might be limited.

Project description:BackgroundThe pressure-volume (P-V) curve has been suggested as a bedside tool to set mechanical ventilation; however, it reflects a global behavior of the lung without giving information on the regional mechanical properties. Regional P-V (PVr) curves derived from electrical impedance tomography (EIT) could provide valuable clinical information at bedside, being able to explore the regional mechanics of the lung. In the present study, we hypothesized that regional P-V curves would provide different information from those obtained from global P-V curves, both in terms of upper and lower inflection points. Therefore, we constructed pressure-volume curves for each pixel row from non-dependent to dependent lung regions of patients affected by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsWe analyzed slow-inflation P-V maneuvers data from 12 mechanically ventilated patients. During the inflation, the pneumotachograph was used to record flow and airway pressure while the EIT signals were recorded digitally. From each maneuver, global respiratory system P-V curve (PVg) and PVr curves were obtained, each one corresponding to a pixel row within the EIT image. PVg and PVr curves were fitted using a sigmoidal equation, and the upper (UIP) and lower (LIP) inflection points for each curve were mathematically identified; LIP and UIP from PVg were respectively called LIPg and UIPg. From each measurement, the highest regional LIP (LIPrMAX) and the lowest regional UIP (UIPrMIN) were identified and the pressure difference between those two points was defined as linear driving pressure (ΔPLIN).ResultsA significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between LIPrMAX (15.8 [9.2-21.1] cmH2O) and LIPg (2.9 [2.2-8.9] cmH2O); in all measurements, the LIPrMAX was higher than the corresponding LIPg. We found a significant difference (p < 0.005) between UIPrMIN (30.1 [23.5-37.6] cmH2O) and UIPg (40.5 [34.2-45] cmH2O), the UIPrMIN always being lower than the corresponding UIPg. Median ΔPLIN was 12.6 [7.4-20.8] cmH2O and in 56% of cases was < 14 cmH2O.ConclusionsRegional inflection points derived by EIT show high variability reflecting lung heterogeneity. Regional P-V curves obtained by EIT could convey more sensitive information than global lung mechanics on the pressures within which all lung regions express linear compliance.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02907840 . Registered on 20 September 2016.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The study objective was to compare titration of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and with ventilator-embedded pressure-volume loop in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS:We have designed a prospective study with historical control group. Twenty-four severe ARDS patients (arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio, PaO2/FiO2?<?100 mmHg) were included in the EIT group and examined prospectively. Data from another 31 severe ARDS patients were evaluated retrospectively (control group). All patients were receiving medical care under identical general support guidelines and protective mechanical ventilation. The PEEP level selected in the EIT group was the intercept point of cumulated collapse and overdistension percentages curves. In the control group, optimal PEEP was selected 2 cmH2O above the lower inflection point on the static pressure-volume curve. RESULTS:Patients in the EIT group were younger (P?<?0.05), and their mean plateau pressure was 1.5 cmH2O higher (P?<?0.01). No differences in other baseline parameters such as APACHE II score, PaO2/FiO2, initial PEEP, driving pressure, tidal volume, and respiratory system compliance were found. Two hours after the first PEEP titration, significantly higher PEEP, compliance, and lower driving pressure were found in the EIT group (P?<?0.01). Hospital survival rates were 66.7% (16 of 24 patients) in the EIT group and 48.4% (15 of 31) in the control group. Identical rates were found regarding the weaning success rate: 66.7% in the EIT group and 48.4% in the control group. CONCLUSION:In severe ARDS patients, it was feasible and safe to guide PEEP titration with EIT at the bedside. As compared with pressure-volume curve, the EIT-guided PEEP titration may be associated with improved oxygenation, compliance, driving pressure, and weaning success rate. The findings encourage further randomized control study with a larger sample size and potentially less bias in the baseline data. Trial Registration NCT03112512.

Dataset Information

Comparison of electrical impedance tomography and intracranial pressure during dehydration treatment of cerebral edema.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets