Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.


ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:To estimate the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). METHODS:Using a modified CISNET breast cancer simulation model, we estimated outcomes for women aged 40-64 years associated with three scenarios: breast cancer screening within the NBCCEDP, screening in the absence of the NBCCEDP (no program), and no screening through any program. We report screening outcomes, cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and sensitivity analyses results. RESULTS:Compared with no program and no screening, the NBCCEDP lowers breast cancer mortality and improves QALYs, but raises health care costs. Base-case ICER for the program was $51,754/QALY versus no program and $50,223/QALY versus no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis ICER for the program was $56,615/QALY [95% CI $24,069, $134,230/QALY] versus no program and $51,096/QALY gained [95% CI $26,423, $97,315/QALY] versus no screening. CONCLUSIONS:On average, breast cancer screening in the NBCCEDP was cost-effective compared with no program or no screening.

SUBMITTER: Rim SH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6613985 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Rim Sun Hee SH   Allaire Benjamin T BT   Ekwueme Donatus U DU   Miller Jacqueline W JW   Subramanian Sujha S   Hall Ingrid J IJ   Hoerger Thomas J TJ  

Cancer causes & control : CCC 20190516 8


<h4>Purpose</h4>To estimate the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).<h4>Methods</h4>Using a modified CISNET breast cancer simulation model, we estimated outcomes for women aged 40-64 years associated with three scenarios: breast cancer screening within the NBCCEDP, screening in the absence of the NBCCEDP (no program), and no screening through any program. We report screening outcomes, cost, quality-adjusted li  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8238931 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7476964 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8263297 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3125279 | biostudies-literature