Dataset Information

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the prognostic impact of ACT in patients who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Articles published from January 1990 to September 2018 were searched in EMBASE, PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) were extracted. Thirteen observational studies were included. There were four National Cancer Database studies with overlapping study periods, thus individual pooled analyses of four different datasets were conducted (n?=?3,182, 3,330, 3,575, and 4,739 for pooled analysis sets including Dossa et al., Polanco et al., Xu et al., and Shahab et al., respectively). Although a trend toward improved OS with ACT was observed, statistical significance was not proven (P?=?0.09, P?=?0.03, P?=?0.12, and P?=?0.10, respectively). When we performed a stratified analysis comparing the results from single institution and multicenter studies, there was no significant prognostic benefit of ACT. Publication bias was not observed. Routine use of ACT in patients with a pCR could not be warranted from the present meta-analysis. Further study of individual patient data from randomized trials is needed to clarify the role of ACT.

SUBMITTER: Lim YJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6620266 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lim Yu Jin YJ Kim Youngkyong Y Kong Moonkyoo M

Scientific reports 20190710 1

This study evaluated the prognostic impact of ACT in patients who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Articles published from January 1990 to September 2018 were searched in EMBASE, PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) were extracted. Thirteen observational studies were included. There were four National Cancer Database studies with overlapping study periods, thus individual pooled analyse ...[more]

PMID: 31292517

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have an improved prognosis if achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) on account of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT). However, the proportion of patients achieving pCR is only 8-24%. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the addition of consolidation chemotherapy to nCRT could improve pCR rate in patients with LARC.Materials and methodsThe subjects were 144 individuals with clinical stage II (T3-4, N0) or III (any T, N1-2) LARC who had received neoadjuvant CRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Eighty-three patients in the consolidation chemotherapy group received two cycles XELOX between CRT and TME, while 61 patients in the standard treatment group without consolidation chemotherapy. The pCR (ypT0N0), tumor downstaging (ypT0-2N0) after TME and adverse events (AEs) during and post treatment were compared between the treatment groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. To adjust the unbalanced variables for the primary endpoint, logistic regression analysis and stratified analysis were performed.ResultsThe consolidation chemotherapy group improved pCR rate (19.3% vs 4.9%, p = 0.01) and tumor downstaging rate (45.8% vs 24.6%, p = 0.009) compared to the standard treatment group. After adjustment for clinical tumor stage, clinical nodal stage and time interval to surgery, patients with consolidation chemotherapy were more likely to reach pCR (adjusted odds ratio 4.91, 95% CI [1.01-23.79], p = 0.048). AEs during and post treatment in the two groups were 54.1% vs 49.3% (p = 0.57), respectively. In addition, the incidence of any grade 1-2 AEs in the two groups was 93.4% vs 95.1% (p = 0.93), while the incidence of grade 3 AEs was 1.6% versus 2.4% (p = 0.74), respectively. No grade 4 AEs occurred in two groups.ConclusionsThe addition of neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy after CRT significantly increased the pCR rate and did not increase the AEs during and post treatment and in patients with LARC.

Project description:The incorporation of chemoradiation prior to resection of the tumour has revolutionized the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. However, a large proportion of these patients are resistant to preoperative treatment schedule. We recently reported that c-Myc gene expression correlates negatively with this resistance in patients with rectal cancer. In this study, we carried out integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression profiling in 45 pre-treatment rectal tumour. Further, expression of miRNAs and c-Myc, and their relationship with clinicopathological factors and patient survival was analysed. As a result, we found that 12 miRNAs were differentially expressed between responder and non-responder rectal cancer patients. Functional classification revealed an association between differentially expressed miRNAs and c-Myc. Subsequent quantitative real-time PCR results showed that both, miRNA-148 and miRNA-375 levels were significantly lower in responder compared to non-responder patients. Notably, the higher level of miRNA-375 was significantly negatively correlated with c-Myc. These results suggest that miRNA-375 and its targeted c-Myc play an important role as predictive biomarker of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, but still not suitable for prognosis. Pre-treatment biopsies of 22 patients with LARC were prospectively collected and freshly frozen according to an institutional board-approved protocol. Tumour response was assessed in surgical specimens by pathological examination based on the semi-quantitative tumour regression grading (TRG) system described by Mandard in 1994[36]: TRG1 and TRG2 scores were considered responders, whereas TRG3, TRG4, and TRG5 were classified as non-responders. The inclusion criteria were: histologically proven rectal tumour at a clinical stage UICC II-III (cT3-4/and or N positive), following endorectal ultrasound and/or MRI scan. Patients were excluded if they had the tumour located above 13 cm from the anal verge by rigid rectoscopy, synchronic colonic cancer assessed by colonoscopy, distant metastases by 18FDG PET-CT scan, and suspicion of hereditary colorectal cancer. All patients subsequently received a total dose of 50.4Gy of radiation (28 fractions of 1.8Gy) associated with capecitabine (oral form of 5-FU) with or without oxaliplatine, according to our Hospital Clinical Practice Guidelines. Standardized Surgery was performed, including total mesorectal excision, following an interval of 8-10 weeks after completion of CT/RT.

Project description:Importance:Although American guidelines recommend use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, individuals who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are less likely to receive adjuvant treatment than incomplete responders. The association and resection of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival in patients with pCR is unclear. Objective:To determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection benefit from the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants:This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study identified patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from the National Cancer Database from 2006 through 2012. We selected patients with nonmetastatic invasive rectal cancer who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection. Exposures:We matched patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy to patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment in a 1:1 ratio. We separately matched subgroups of patients with node-positive disease before treatment and node-negative disease before treatment to investigate for effect modification by pretreatment nodal status. Main Outcome and Measures:We compared overall survival between groups using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Results:We identified 2455 patients (mean age, 59.5 years; 59.8% men) with rectal cancer with pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection. We matched 667 patients with pCR who received adjuvant chemotherapy and at least 8 weeks of follow-up after surgery to patients with pCR who did not receive adjuvant treatment. Over a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 1.94-4.40 years), patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated better overall survival than those who did not receive adjuvant treatment (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.70). When stratified by pretreatment nodal status, only those patients with pretreatment node-positive disease exhibited improved overall survival with administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.58). Conclusions and Relevance:The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer with pCR is associated with improved overall survival, particularly in patients with pretreatment node-positive disease. Although this study suggests a beneficial effect of adjuvant treatment on survival in patients with pCR, these results are limited by the presence of potential unmeasured confounding in this nonrandomized study.

Dataset Information

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure