Dataset Information

Identification by high-throughput sequencing of HPV variants and quasispecies that are untypeable by linear reverse blotting assay in cervical specimens.

ABSTRACT: The linear reverse blotting assays are valid methods for accurate human papillomavirus (HPV) typing required to manage women at risk of developing cervical cancer. However, some samples showed a positive signal in HPV lines but failed to display a positive signal in subsequent typing lines (designated as HPV-X), which indicate that certain types were not available on the respective typing blots. The aim of this study is to elucidate the types or variants of HPV through the high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of 54 ASCUS cervical samples in which the viruses remained untypeable with INNO LiPA HPV^® assays. Low-risk (LR)-HPV types (HPV6, 30, 42, 62, 67, 72, 74, 81, 83, 84, 87, 89, 90 and 114), high-risk (HR)-HPV35 and possibly (p)HR-HPV73 were detected among HPV-X. Individual multiple infections (two to seven types) were detected in 40.7% of samples. Twenty-two specimens contained variants characterised by 2-10 changes. HPV30 reached the maximal number of 17 variants with relative abundance inferior or equal to 2.7%. The presence of L1 quasispecies explains why linear reverse blotting assays fail when variants compete or do not match the specific probes. Further studies are needed to measure the LR-HPV quasispecies dynamics and its role during persistent infection.

SUBMITTER: Molet L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6620621 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA detection in cervical cytology samples is useful for primary screening of cervical cancer and for triage of patients with equivocal cytological findings. The GenoFlow HPV array test (GF assay; Diagcor Bioscience Inc., Hong Kong) was recently developed to detect 33 HPV genotypes by a "flowthrough" hybridization technology. In this study, we assessed the analytical sensitivity and reproducibility of the GF assay and compared its genotyping results with those of the Linear Array (LA) assay (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), using 400 archived liquid-based cytology samples representing the full range of cytology findings. Genotyping findings of the GF and LA assays were concordant or compatible for 93.44% of tested samples, with a good (? = 0.797) to very good (? = 0.812) strength of agreement for assay-common and oncogenic HPV types, respectively. The two assays showed good (? = 0.635) agreement in detecting infections with multiple HPV genotypes. The lowest detection limits of the GF assay for HPV16 and HPV18 were 25 copies and 20 copies, respectively. Repeat testing of 60 samples by use of two different lots of the GF assay revealed no discordant results, suggesting good reproducibility of the assay. Both assays achieved approximately 80% and 100% sensitivity for identifying cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) with subsequent detection of LSIL+ and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or higher (HSIL+) in 2 years, respectively. Among ASC-US samples, the GF assay achieved the highest specificity (23.08%) for indicating subsequent identification of HSIL compared with the LA (19.23%) and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) (8.97%) assays. The GF and LA assays showed significant discrepancy in detecting HPV genotypes 11, 26, 39, 52, and 66. More sensitive detection of HPV52 by GF assay offers an advantage in regions where HPV52 is more prevalent. The sensitivity of the GF assay for detecting patients with HSIL+ was noninferior to that of the LA assay.

Dataset Information

Identification by high-throughput sequencing of HPV variants and quasispecies that are untypeable by linear reverse blotting assay in cervical specimens.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets