Dataset Information

Preliminary Clinical Study of the Differences Between Interobserver Evaluation and Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of Multiple Organs at Risk in CT Images of Lung Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Background: In this study, publicly datasets with organs at risk (OAR) structures were used as reference data to compare the differences of several observers. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based auto-contouring was also used in the analysis. We evaluated the variations among observers and the effect of CNN-based auto-contouring in clinical applications. Materials and methods: A total of 60 publicly available lung cancer CT with structures were used; 48 cases were used for training, and the other 12 cases were used for testing. The structures of the datasets were used as reference data. Three observers and a CNN-based program performed contouring for 12 testing cases, and the 3D dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance (MSD) were used to evaluate differences from the reference data. The three observers edited the CNN-based contours, and the results were compared to those of manual contouring. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Compared to the reference data, no statistically significant differences were observed for the DSCs and MSDs among the manual contouring performed by the three observers at the same institution for the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and left and right lungs. The 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-values of the CNN-based auto-contouring results comparing to the manual results for the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and left and right lungs were as follows: the DSCs were CNN vs. A: 0.914~0.939(P = 0.004), 0.746~0.808(P = 0.002), 0.866~0.887(P = 0.136), 0.952~0.966(P = 0.158) and 0.960~0.972 (P = 0.136); CNN vs. B: 0.913~0.936 (P = 0.002), 0.745~0.807 (P = 0.005), 0.864~0.894 (P = 0.239), 0.952~0.964 (P = 0.308), and 0.959~0.971 (P = 0.272); and CNN vs. C: 0.912~0.933 (P = 0.004), 0.748~0.804(P = 0.002), 0.867~0.890 (P = 0.530), 0.952~0.964 (P = 0.308), and 0.958~0.970 (P = 0.480), respectively. The P-values of MSDs are similar to DSCs. The P-values of heart and esophagus is smaller than 0.05. No significant differences were found between the edited CNN-based auto-contouring results and the manual results. Conclusion: For the spinal cord, both lungs, no statistically significant differences were found between CNN-based auto-contouring and manual contouring. Further modifications to contouring of the heart and esophagus are necessary. Overall, editing based on CNN-based auto-contouring can effectively shorten the contouring time without affecting the results. CNNs have considerable potential for automatic contouring applications.

SUBMITTER: Zhu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6624788 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Preliminary Clinical Study of the Differences Between Interobserver Evaluation and Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of Multiple Organs at Risk in CT Images of Lung Cancer.

Zhu Jinhan J Liu Yimei Y Zhang Jun J Wang Yixuan Y Chen Lixin L

Frontiers in oncology 20190705

<b>Background:</b> In this study, publicly datasets with organs at risk (OAR) structures were used as reference data to compare the differences of several observers. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based auto-contouring was also used in the analysis. We evaluated the variations among observers and the effect of CNN-based auto-contouring in clinical applications. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A total of 60 publicly available lung cancer CT with structures were used; 48 cases were used for trai ...[more]

PMID: 31334129

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the diagnostic accuracy of cascading convolutional neural network (CNN) for urinary stone detection on unenhanced CT images and to evaluate the performance of pretrained models enriched with labeled CT images across different scanners.Materials and methodsThis HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved, retrospective clinical study used unenhanced abdominopelvic CT scans from 535 adults suspected of having urolithiasis. The scans were obtained on two scanners (scanner 1 [hereafter S1] and scanner 2 [hereafter S2]). A radiologist reviewed clinical reports and labeled cases for determination of reference standard. Stones were present on 279 (S1, 131; S2, 148) and absent on 256 (S1, 158; S2, 98) scans. One hundred scans (50 from each scanner) were randomly reserved as the test dataset, and the rest were used for developing a cascade of two CNNs: The first CNN identified the extent of the urinary tract, and the second CNN detected presence of stone. Nine variations of models were developed through the combination of different training data sources (S1, S2, or both [hereafter SB]) with (ImageNet, GrayNet) and without (Random) pretrained CNNs. First, models were compared for generalizability at the section level. Second, models were assessed by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy at the patient level with test dataset from both scanners (n = 100).ResultsThe GrayNet-pretrained model showed higher classifier exactness than did ImageNet-pretrained or Random-initialized models when tested by using data from the same or different scanners at section level. At the patient level, the AUC for stone detection was 0.92-0.95, depending on the model. Accuracy of GrayNet-SB (95%) was higher than that of ImageNet-SB (91%) and Random-SB (88%). For stones larger than 4 mm, all models showed similar performance (false-negative results: two of 34). For stones smaller than 4 mm, the number of false-negative results for GrayNet-SB, ImageNet-SB, and Random-SB were one of 16, three of 16, and five of 16, respectively. GrayNet-SB identified stones in all 22 test cases that had obstructive uropathy.ConclusionA cascading model of CNNs can detect urinary tract stones on unenhanced CT scans with a high accuracy (AUC, 0.954). Performance and generalization of CNNs across scanners can be enhanced by using transfer learning with datasets enriched with labeled medical images.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article. : An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on August 6, 2019.

Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to (1) develop a fully residual deep convolutional neural network (CNN)-based segmentation software for computed tomography image segmentation of the male pelvic region and (2) demonstrate its efficiency in the male pelvic region.MethodsA total of 470 prostate cancer patients who had undergone intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy were enrolled. Our model was based on FusionNet, a fully residual deep CNN developed to semantically segment biological images. To develop the CNN-based segmentation software, 450 patients were randomly selected and separated into the training, validation and testing groups (270, 90, and 90 patients, respectively). In Experiment 1, to determine the optimal model, we first assessed the segmentation accuracy according to the size of the training dataset (90, 180, and 270 patients). In Experiment 2, the effect of varying the number of training labels on segmentation accuracy was evaluated. After determining the optimal model, in Experiment 3, the developed software was used on the remaining 20 datasets to assess the segmentation accuracy. The volumetric dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (95%HD) were calculated to evaluate the segmentation accuracy for each organ in Experiment 3.ResultsIn Experiment 1, the median DSC for the prostate were 0.61 for dataset 1 (90 patients), 0.86 for dataset 2 (180 patients), and 0.86 for dataset 3 (270 patients), respectively. The median DSCs for all the organs increased significantly when the number of training cases increased from 90 to 180 but did not improve upon further increase from 180 to 270. The number of labels applied during training had a little effect on the DSCs in Experiment 2. The optimal model was built by 270 patients and four organs. In Experiment 3, the median of the DSC and the 95%HD values were 0.82 and 3.23 mm for prostate; 0.71 and 3.82 mm for seminal vesicles; 0.89 and 2.65 mm for the rectum; 0.95 and 4.18 mm for the bladder, respectively.ConclusionsWe have developed a CNN-based segmentation software for the male pelvic region and demonstrated that the CNN-based segmentation software is efficient for the male pelvic region.

Project description:PurposeTo describe and evaluate a new segmentation method using deep convolutional neural network (CNN), 3D fully connected conditional random field (CRF), and 3D simplex deformable modeling to improve the efficiency and accuracy of knee joint tissue segmentation.MethodsA segmentation pipeline was built by combining a semantic segmentation CNN, 3D fully connected CRF, and 3D simplex deformable modeling. A convolutional encoder-decoder network was designed as the core of the segmentation method to perform high resolution pixel-wise multi-class tissue classification for 12 different joint structures. The 3D fully connected CRF was applied to regularize contextual relationship among voxels within the same tissue class and between different classes. The 3D simplex deformable modeling refined the output from 3D CRF to preserve the overall shape and maintain a desirable smooth surface for joint structures. The method was evaluated on 3D fast spin-echo (3D-FSE) MR image data sets. Quantitative morphological metrics were used to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of the method in comparison to the ground truth data.ResultsThe proposed segmentation method provided good performance for segmenting all knee joint structures. There were 4 tissue types with high mean Dice coefficient above 0.9 including the femur, tibia, muscle, and other non-specified tissues. There were 7 tissue types with mean Dice coefficient between 0.8 and 0.9 including the femoral cartilage, tibial cartilage, patella, patellar cartilage, meniscus, quadriceps and patellar tendon, and infrapatellar fat pad. There was 1 tissue type with mean Dice coefficient between 0.7 and 0.8 for joint effusion and Baker's cyst. Most musculoskeletal tissues had a mean value of average symmetric surface distance below 1 mm.ConclusionThe combined CNN, 3D fully connected CRF, and 3D deformable modeling approach was well-suited for performing rapid and accurate comprehensive tissue segmentation of the knee joint. The deep learning-based segmentation method has promising potential applications in musculoskeletal imaging.

Project description:IntroductionLinear accelerator (linac) incorporating a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging device providing enhanced soft tissue contrast is particularly suited for abdominal radiation therapy. In particular, accurate segmentation for abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OARs) required for the treatment planning is becoming possible. Currently, this segmentation is performed manually by radiation oncologists. This process is very time consuming and subject to inter and intra operator variabilities. In this work, deep learning based automatic segmentation solutions were investigated for abdominal OARs on 0.35 T MR-images.MethodsOne hundred and twenty one sets of abdominal MR images and their corresponding ground truth segmentations were collected and used for this work. The OARs of interest included the liver, the kidneys, the spinal cord, the stomach and the duodenum. Several UNet based models have been trained in 2D (the Classical UNet, the ResAttention UNet, the EfficientNet UNet, and the nnUNet). The best model was then trained with a 3D strategy in order to investigate possible improvements. Geometrical metrics such as Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Hausdorff Distance (HD) and analysis of the calculated volumes (thanks to Bland-Altman plot) were performed to evaluate the results.ResultsThe nnUNet trained in 3D mode achieved the best performance, with DSC scores for the liver, the kidneys, the spinal cord, the stomach, and the duodenum of 0.96 ± 0.01, 0.91 ± 0.02, 0.91 ± 0.01, 0.83 ± 0.10, and 0.69 ± 0.15, respectively. The matching IoU scores were 0.92 ± 0.01, 0.84 ± 0.04, 0.84 ± 0.02, 0.54 ± 0.16 and 0.72 ± 0.13. The corresponding HD scores were 13.0 ± 6.0 mm, 16.0 ± 6.6 mm, 3.3 ± 0.7 mm, 35.0 ± 33.0 mm, and 42.0 ± 24.0 mm. The analysis of the calculated volumes followed the same behavior.DiscussionAlthough the segmentation results for the duodenum were not optimal, these findings imply a potential clinical application of the 3D nnUNet model for the segmentation of abdominal OARs for images from 0.35 T MR-Linac.

Project description:PurposeTo determine whether convolutional neural networks can detect morphological differences between images of microbiologically positive and negative corneal ulcers.MethodsA cross-sectional comparison of prospectively collected data consisting of bacterial and fungal cultures and smears from eyes with acute infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital. Two convolutional neural network architectures (DenseNet and MobileNet) were trained using images obtained from handheld cameras collected from culture-positive and negative images and smear-positive and -negative images. Each architecture was trained on two image sets: (1) one with labels assigned using only culture results and (2) one using culture and smear results. The outcome measure was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting whether an ulcer would be microbiologically positive or negative.ResultsThere were 1970 images from 886 patients were included. None of the models were better than random chance at predicting positive microbiologic results (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.49 to 0.56; all confidence intervals included 0.5).ConclusionsThese two state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network architectures could not reliably predict whether a corneal ulcer would be microbiologically positive or negative based on clinical photographs. This absence of detectable morphological differences informs the future development of computer vision models trained to predict the causative agent in infectious keratitis using corneal photography.Translational relevanceThese deep learning models were not able to identify morphological differences between microbiologically positive and negative corneal ulcers. This finding suggests that similar artificial intelligence models trained to identify the causative pathogen using only microbiologically positive cases may have potential to generalize well, including to cases with falsely negative microbiologic testing.

Dataset Information

Preliminary Clinical Study of the Differences Between Interobserver Evaluation and Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of Multiple Organs at Risk in CT Images of Lung Cancer.

Publications

Preliminary Clinical Study of the Differences Between Interobserver Evaluation and Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of Multiple Organs at Risk in CT Images of Lung Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets