Dataset Information

The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Frailty is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. We sought to describe frailty among U.S. Veterans and its association with mortality.

Methods

Nationwide retrospective cohort study of regular Veterans Affairs (VA) users, aged at least 65 years in 2002-2012, followed through 2014, using national VA administrative and Medicare and Medicaid data. A frailty index (FI) for VA (VA-FI) was calculated using the cumulative deficit method. Thirty-one age-related deficits in health from diagnostic and procedure codes were included and were updated biennially. Survival analysis assessed associations between VA-FI and mortality.

Results

A VA-FI was calculated for 2,837,152 Veterans over 10 years. In 2002, 35.5% were non-frail (FI = 0-0.10), 32.6% were pre-frail (FI = 0.11-0.20), 18.9% were mildly frail (FI = 0.21-0.30), 8.7% were moderately frail (FI = 0.31-0.40), and 4.3% were severely frail (FI > 0.40). From 2002 to 2012, the prevalence of moderate frailty increased to 12.7%and severe frailty to 14.1%. Frailty was strongly associated with survival and was independent of age, sex, race, and smoking; the VA-FI better predicted mortality than age alone. Although prevalence of frailty rose over time, compared to non-frail Veterans, 2 years' hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for mortality declined from a peak in 2004 of 2.01 (1.97-2.04), 3.49 (3.44-3.55), 5.88 (5.79-5.97), and 10.39 (10.23-10.56) for pre-frail, mildly, moderately, and severely frail, respectively, to 1.51 (1.49-1.53), 2.36 (2.33-2.39), 3.68 (3.63-3.73), 6.62 (6.53-6.71) in 2012. At every frailty level, risk of mortality was lower for women versus men and higher for blacks versus whites.

Conclusions

Frailty affects at least 3 of every 10 U.S. Veterans aged 65 years and older, and is strongly associated with mortality. The VA-FI could be used to more accurately estimate life expectancy and individualize care for Veterans.

SUBMITTER: Orkaby AR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6625596 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012.

Orkaby Ariela R AR Nussbaum Lisa L Ho Yuk-Lam YL Gagnon David D Quach Lien L Ward Rachel R Quaden Rachel R Yaksic Enzo E Harrington Kelly K Paik Julie M JM Kim Dae H DH Wilson Peter W PW Gaziano J Michael JM Djousse Luc L Cho Kelly K Driver Jane A JA

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 20190701 8

<h4>Background</h4>Frailty is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. We sought to describe frailty among U.S. Veterans and its association with mortality.<h4>Methods</h4>Nationwide retrospective cohort study of regular Veterans Affairs (VA) users, aged at least 65 years in 2002-2012, followed through 2014, using national VA administrative and Medicare and Medicaid data. A frailty index (FI) for VA (VA-FI) was calculated using the cumulative deficit method. Thirty-one age-related deficits in hea ...[more]

PMID: 30307533

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe authors sought to determine the association of cannabis indicators with self-reported psychotic disorders in the U.S. general population.MethodsParticipants were from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC; 2001-2002; N=43,093) and NESARC-III (2012-2013; N=36,309). Logistic regression was used to estimate standardized prevalences of past-year self-reported psychotic disorders within each survey and to evaluate the association of past-year self-reported psychotic disorders with indicators of nonmedical cannabis use (any use; frequent use [at least three times/week], daily/near-daily use, and DSM-IV cannabis use disorder) compared with those with no past-year nonmedical cannabis use. Whether the strength of associations differed between surveys was indicated by difference-in-difference tests (between-survey contrasts) and ratios of odds ratios between surveys.ResultsSelf-reported psychotic disorders were significantly more prevalent among participants with any nonmedical cannabis use than those without (2001-2002: 1.65% compared with 0.27%; 2012-2013: 1.89% compared with 0.68%). In 2001-2002, self-reported psychotic disorders were unrelated to either frequent use or daily/near-daily use. However, in 2012 - 2013, compared with nonusers, self-reported psychotic disorders were more common among participants with frequent use and those with daily/near-daily nonmedical cannabis use (2012-2013: 2.79% and 2.52%, respectively, compared with 0.68% among nonusers). Self-reported psychotic disorders were significantly more prevalent among participants with cannabis use disorder than nonusers in both surveys (2001-2002: 2.55% compared with 0.27%; 2012 - 2013: 3.38% compared with 0.68%). The strength of these associations did not change over time.ConclusionsData from the U.S. general population, especially more recent data, suggest associations between self-reported psychotic disorder and frequent nonmedical cannabis use and cannabis use disorder. Clinicians and policy makers should consider these relationships when monitoring patients and formulating programs.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:This study examines the relationships between hospitals' annual acute respiratory distress syndrome case volume with hospitals' acute respiratory distress syndrome case fatality rates and individuals' odds of acute respiratory distress syndrome hospital mortality. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING:The U.S. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2002-2011. PATIENTS:Acute respiratory distress syndrome discharges defined by the presence of an acute respiratory distress syndrome International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code (518.82 or 518.5) and a mechanical ventilation procedure code (96.70, 96.71 or 96.72) on the discharge diagnosis and procedure lists. If the procedure code 96.71 was on the discharge record (mechanical ventilation < 96?hr duration), the patient also needed to be classified as deceased. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:We analyzed 2,686 hospitals and 117,204 cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Average annual hospital acute respiratory distress syndrome in-hospital mortality was 47%. Acute respiratory distress syndrome case volume was categorized as low (1-9), medium (10-49), and high (50-423 cases per year). In a hospital-level Poisson regression adjusting for hospital characteristics, when compared with low-volume acute respiratory distress syndrome hospitals, high- and medium-volume acute respiratory distress syndrome hospitals had lower annual acute respiratory distress syndrome case fatality (rate ratio, 0.75; 99% CI, 0.71-0.79 and rate ratio, 0.86; 99% CI, 0.82-0.90, respectively; p ? 0.001 for both). In an individual-level, multivariable model adjusting for hospital and individual characteristics, high and medium acute respiratory distress syndrome volume hospitals were associated with lower odds of acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality compared with low-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.85 [99% CI, 0.74-0.99]; p = 0.006 and odds ratio, 0.89 [99% CI 0.79-1.00]; p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:In this cohort, at both an individual- and hospital-level, higher acute respiratory distress syndrome hospital case volume is associated with lower acute respiratory distress syndrome hospital mortality.

Project description:BackgroundGlobal and regional projections of mortality and burden of disease by cause for the years 2000, 2010, and 2030 were published by Murray and Lopez in 1996 as part of the Global Burden of Disease project. These projections, which are based on 1990 data, continue to be widely quoted, although they are substantially outdated; in particular, they substantially underestimated the spread of HIV/AIDS. To address the widespread demand for information on likely future trends in global health, and thereby to support international health policy and priority setting, we have prepared new projections of mortality and burden of disease to 2030 starting from World Health Organization estimates of mortality and burden of disease for 2002. This paper describes the methods, assumptions, input data, and results.Methods and findingsRelatively simple models were used to project future health trends under three scenarios-baseline, optimistic, and pessimistic-based largely on projections of economic and social development, and using the historically observed relationships of these with cause-specific mortality rates. Data inputs have been updated to take account of the greater availability of death registration data and the latest available projections for HIV/AIDS, income, human capital, tobacco smoking, body mass index, and other inputs. In all three scenarios there is a dramatic shift in the distribution of deaths from younger to older ages and from communicable, maternal, perinatal, and nutritional causes to noncommunicable disease causes. The risk of death for children younger than 5 y is projected to fall by nearly 50% in the baseline scenario between 2002 and 2030. The proportion of deaths due to noncommunicable disease is projected to rise from 59% in 2002 to 69% in 2030. Global HIV/AIDS deaths are projected to rise from 2.8 million in 2002 to 6.5 million in 2030 under the baseline scenario, which assumes coverage with antiretroviral drugs reaches 80% by 2012. Under the optimistic scenario, which also assumes increased prevention activity, HIV/AIDS deaths are projected to drop to 3.7 million in 2030. Total tobacco-attributable deaths are projected to rise from 5.4 million in 2005 to 6.4 million in 2015 and 8.3 million in 2030 under our baseline scenario. Tobacco is projected to kill 50% more people in 2015 than HIV/AIDS, and to be responsible for 10% of all deaths globally. The three leading causes of burden of disease in 2030 are projected to include HIV/AIDS, unipolar depressive disorders, and ischaemic heart disease in the baseline and pessimistic scenarios. Road traffic accidents are the fourth leading cause in the baseline scenario, and the third leading cause ahead of ischaemic heart disease in the optimistic scenario. Under the baseline scenario, HIV/AIDS becomes the leading cause of burden of disease in middle- and low-income countries by 2015.ConclusionsThese projections represent a set of three visions of the future for population health, based on certain explicit assumptions. Despite the wide uncertainty ranges around future projections, they enable us to appreciate better the implications for health and health policy of currently observed trends, and the likely impact of fairly certain future trends, such as the ageing of the population, the continued spread of HIV/AIDS in many regions, and the continuation of the epidemiological transition in developing countries. The results depend strongly on the assumption that future mortality trends in poor countries will have a relationship to economic and social development similar to those that have occurred in the higher-income countries.

Dataset Information

The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets