Dataset Information

Vernakalant and electrical cardioversion for AF - Safe and effective.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Rapid restoration of sinus rhythm is an integral part of the management of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of vernakalant, a multi-channel blocking agent, in combination with external electrical cardioversion.

Methods

This prospective cohort study comprised 230 patients (female 35%; median age 50 IQR 42-55) with recent-onset AF presenting to a university tertiary care center during a 6-year period. Management included intravenous vernakalant followed by electrical cardioversion in case of pharmacological failure.

Results

Within 11?min (IQR 8-29), sinus rhythm could be restored by sole pharmacological management in 167 patients (73%). A left ventricular function lower than 55% (OR 3.51 (1.45-8.52)) and prior atrial fibrillation episodes being classified as persistent (OR 2.33 (1.13-4.80)) were significant predictors for non-response to vernakalant. Electrical cardioversion was successful in all patients but one within 196?min (IQR 149-300) of administration of first dosage of vernakalant. No serious adverse events could be observed. 3 patients needed further in-patient care.

Conclusion

Management of recent-onset atrial fibrillation consisting of intravenous vernakalant followed by electrical cardioversion in case of failure appears safe and efficacious. Achieving a rapid conversion, this approach could potentially save resources and costs.

SUBMITTER: Simon A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6626112 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Vernakalant and electrical cardioversion for AF - Safe and effective.

Simon Alexander A Niederdoeckl Jan J Janata Karin K Spiel Alexander Oskar AO Schuetz Nikola N Schnaubelt Sebastian S Herkner Harald H Cacioppo Filippo F Laggner Anton Norbert AN Domanovits Hans H

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 20190711

<h4>Aims</h4>Rapid restoration of sinus rhythm is an integral part of the management of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of vernakalant, a multi-channel blocking agent, in combination with external electrical cardioversion.<h4>Methods</h4>This prospective cohort study comprised 230 patients (female 35%; median age 50 IQR 42-55) with recent-onset AF presenting to a university tertiary care center during a 6-year period. Management included intravenous verna ...[more]

PMID: 31338415

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundElectrical cardioversion is an effective procedure for restoring normal sinus rhythm in the hearts of patients with irregular heart rhythms. It is important that the patient is not fully conscious during the procedure, as it can be painful and distressing. The drug used to make patients unaware of the procedure should rapidly achieve the desired level of sedation, should wear off quickly and should not cause cardiovascular or respiratory side effects.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness and adverse events associated with various anaesthetic or sedative agents used in direct current cardioversion for cardiac arrhythmia in both elective and emergency settings.We sought answers to the following specific questions.• Which drugs deliver the best outcomes for patients undergoing electrical cardioversion?• Does using a particular agent confer advantages or disadvantages?• Is additional analgesic necessary to prevent pain?Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) on 27 March 2014. Our search terms were relevant to the review question and were not limited by outcomes. We also carried out searches of clinical trials registers and forward and backward citation tracking.Selection criteriaWe considered all randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized and cluster-randomized studies with adult participants undergoing electrical cardioversion procedures in the elective or emergency setting.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data, consulting with a third review author for disagreements. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures, including assessment of risk of bias for all studies.Main resultsWe included 23 studies with 1250 participants that compared one drug with one or more other drugs. Of these comparisons, 19 studies compared propofol with another drug. Seven of these compared propofol with etomidate (four of which combined the drugs with remifentanil or fentanyl), five midazolam, six thiopentone and two sevoflurane. Three studies compared etomidate with thiopentone, and three etomidate with midazolam. Two studies compared thiopentone with midazolam, one thiopentone with diazepam and one midazolam with diazepam. Drug doses and the time over which the drugs were given varied between studies. Although all studies were described as randomized, limited information was provided about the methods used for selection and group allocation. A high level of performance bias was observed across studies, as study authors had not attempted to blind the anaesthetist to group allocation. Similarly, study authors had rarely provided sufficient information on whether outcome assessors had been blinded.Included studies presented outcome data for hypotension, apnoea, participant recall, success of cardioversion, minor adverse events of nausea and vomiting, pain at injection site and myoclonus, additional analgesia and participant satisfaction. We did not pool the data from different studies in view of the multiple drug comparisons, differences in definitions and reporting of outcomes, variability of endpoints and high or unclear risk of bias across studies.Authors' conclusionsFew studies reported statistically significant results for our relevant outcomes, and most study authors concluded that both, or all, agents compared in individual studies were adequate for cardioversion procedures. It is our opinion that at present, there is no evidence to suggest that current anaesthetic practice for cardioversion should change.

Dataset Information

Vernakalant and electrical cardioversion for AF - Safe and effective.

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Vernakalant and electrical cardioversion for AF - Safe and effective.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets