Dataset Information

Somatic genetic alterations in synchronous and metachronous low-grade serous tumours and high-grade carcinomas of the adnexa.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) and their precursors serous borderline tumours (SBTs) characteristically harbour mutations in BRAF, KRAS or NRAS but rarely in TP53, whereas high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) are characterised by frequent TP53 mutations but rare BRAF, KRAS or NRAS mutations. In a small subset of cases, LGSCs and/or SBTs develop into high-grade tumours, including HGSCs and poorly differentiated carcinomas (PDCs). Here, we sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in low-grade serous tumours and synchronous or metachronous high-grade adnexal carcinomas.

Methods and results

DNA extracted from five SBTs/LGSCs and synchronous or metachronous HGSCs/PDCs and matched normal tissue was subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting all exons and selected non-coding regions of 341 cancer-related genes. The low-grade and high-grade tumours from a given case were related, and shared mutations and copy number alterations. Progression from low-grade to high-grade lesions was observed, and involved the acquisition of additional mutations and/or copy number alterations, or shifts from subclonal to clonal mutations. Only two (an HGSC and a PDC) of the five high-grade tumours investigated harboured TP53 mutations, whereas NRAS and KRAS hotspot mutations were seen in two HGSCs and one HGSC, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that progression from SBT to HGSC may take place in a subset of cases, and that at least some of the rare HGSCs lacking TP53 mutations may be derived from a low-grade serous precursor.

SUBMITTER: Murali R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6626549 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Somatic genetic alterations in synchronous and metachronous low-grade serous tumours and high-grade carcinomas of the adnexa.

Murali Rajmohan R Selenica Pier P Brown David N DN Cheetham R Keira RK Chandramohan Raghu R Claros Nidia L NL Bouvier Nancy N Cheng Donavan T DT Soslow Robert A RA Weigelt Britta B McCluggage W Glenn WG

Histopathology 20190115 4

<h4>Aims</h4>Low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) and their precursors serous borderline tumours (SBTs) characteristically harbour mutations in BRAF, KRAS or NRAS but rarely in TP53, whereas high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) are characterised by frequent TP53 mutations but rare BRAF, KRAS or NRAS mutations. In a small subset of cases, LGSCs and/or SBTs develop into high-grade tumours, including HGSCs and poorly differentiated carcinomas (PDCs). Here, we sought to define the repertoire of somat ...[more]

PMID: 30565721

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOvarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) has fewer mutations than ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and a less aggressive clinical course. However, an overwhelming majority of LGSC patients do not respond to conventional chemotherapy resulting in a poor long-term prognosis comparable to women diagnosed with HGSC. KRAS and BRAF mutations are common in LGSC, leading to clinical trials targeting the MAPK pathway. We assessed the stability of targetable somatic mutations over space and/or time in LGSC, with a view to inform stratified treatment strategies and clinical trial design.MethodsEleven LGSC cases with primary and recurrent paired samples were identified (stage IIB-IV). Tumor DNA was isolated from 1-4 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from both the primary and recurrence (n = 37 tumor and n = 7 normal samples). Mutational analysis was performed using the Ion Torrent AmpliSeqTM Cancer Panel, with targeted validation using Fluidigm-MiSeq, Sanger sequencing and/or Raindance Raindrop digital PCR.ResultsKRAS (3/11), BRAF (2/11) and/or NRAS (1/11) mutations were identified in five unique cases. A novel, non-synonymous mutation in SMAD4 was observed in one case. No somatic mutations were detected in the remaining six cases. In two cases with a single matched primary and recurrent sample, two KRAS hotspot mutations (G12V, G12R) were both stable over time. In three cases with multiple samplings from both the primary and recurrent surgery some mutations (NRAS Q61R, BRAF V600E, SMAD4 R361G) were stable across all samples, while others (KRAS G12V, BRAF G469V) were unstable.ConclusionsOverall, the majority of cases with detectable somatic mutations showed mutational stability over space and time while one of five cases showed both temporal and spatial mutational instability in presumed drivers of disease. Investigation of additional cases is required to confirm whether mutational heterogeneity in a minority of LGSC is a general phenomenon that should be factored into the design of clinical trials and stratified treatment for this patient population.

Project description:Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential and low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas are thought to represent different stages on a tumorigenic continuum and to develop along pathways distinct from high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. We performed gene expression profiling on three normal human ovarian surface epithelia samples, and 10 low-grade and 10 high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. Analysis of gene expression profiles of these samples has identified 80 genes upregulated and 232 genes downregulated in low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. PAX2 was found to be one of the most upregulated genes in low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. The upregulation of PAX2 was validated by real-time quantitative RT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemical analyses. Real-time RT-PCR showed a statistically significant difference in PAX2 mRNA expression (expressed as fold change in comparison to normal human ovarian surface epithelia) among ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (1837.38, N=8), low-grade (183.12, N=17), and high-grade (3.72, N=23) carcinoma samples (P=0.015). Western blot analysis revealed strong PAX2 expression in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (67%, N=3) and low-grade carcinoma samples (50%, N=10) but no PAX2 protein expression in high-grade carcinomas (0%, N=10). Using immunohistochemistry, tumors of low malignant potential (59%, N=17) and low-grade carcinoma (63%, N=16) samples expressed significantly stronger nuclear staining than high-grade ovarian carcinoma samples (9.1%, N=263). Furthermore, consistent with earlier immunohistochemical findings, PAX2 expression was expressed in the epithelial cells of fallopian tubes but not in normal ovarian surface epithelial cells. Our findings further support the two-tiered hypothesis that tumors of low malignant potential and low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma are on a continuum and are distinct from high-grade ovarian carcinomas. In addition, the absence of PAX2 expression in normal ovarian epithelia but expression in fallopian tube fimbria and ciliated epithelial inclusions would suggest the potential development of tumors of low malignant potential and of low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas from secondary Müllerian structures.

Dataset Information

Somatic genetic alterations in synchronous and metachronous low-grade serous tumours and high-grade carcinomas of the adnexa.

Aims

Methods and results

Conclusions

Publications

Somatic genetic alterations in synchronous and metachronous low-grade serous tumours and high-grade carcinomas of the adnexa.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets