Dataset Information

Self-Assessment of Preparedness among Critical Care Trainees Transitioning from Fellowship to Practice.

ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the subjective assessment of preparedness needs of critical care trainees and recent graduates between 2013 and 2014. A questionnaire was developed and validated by the subcommittee of the In-Training Section of Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). The survey was deployed twice between December 2013 and January 2014 via email to any trainee or individual graduated from a critical care fellowship within the previous three years. Six percent (180) of all individuals completed the survey, and 67% of respondents had recently interviewed for a job. Northeast was the preferred location for a job (47%), and academia was favored over private practice (80% vs. 15%). Of the respondents that secured an interview, 55% felt prepared for the interview, 67% felt prepared to build an adequate job portfolio, 33% received formal guidance from their mentor/training program. 89% of total respondents agreed it is important to participate in a formal training course in job search, portfolio development, and interviewing process. The preferred sources of training were equally distributed between their home institution, webinars, and SCCM. There is an ongoing need in education regarding the transition period from fellowship to practice.

SUBMITTER: Watkins L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6628175 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Self-Assessment of Preparedness among Critical Care Trainees Transitioning from Fellowship to Practice.

Watkins Laura L DiMeglio Matthew M Laudanski Krzysztof K

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 20190530 2

This study evaluated the subjective assessment of preparedness needs of critical care trainees and recent graduates between 2013 and 2014. A questionnaire was developed and validated by the subcommittee of the In-Training Section of Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). The survey was deployed twice between December 2013 and January 2014 via email to any trainee or individual graduated from a critical care fellowship within the previous three years. Six percent (180) of all individuals compl ...[more]

PMID: 31151167

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Dedicated ambulatory training during pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowships is often limited. A novel 2-year longitudinal outpatient pulmonary fellowship curriculum was previously developed, piloted, and studied. The exportability and potential impact of this ambulatory curriculum on PCCM fellowship training nationally is not known. Objective: We aim to understand the current state of ambulatory training in PCCM fellowships and the impact of a standardized outpatient curriculum on fellows' ambulatory knowledge and competency. Methods: Nineteen programs participated in the study from 2017 to 2019. Six programs received the first year of content, seven programs received the entire 2-year curriculum, and seven programs served as a control. Fellows, faculty, and program directors (PDs) completed a series of surveys assessing satisfaction with ambulatory education and the curriculum. Fellows completed a series of medical knowledge inventories, and programs submitted in-training exam scores. Results: A total of 221 fellows (39%) and 17 PDs (89%) completed the precurriculum surveys, and 38 (12%) fellows and 10 (53%) PDs completed postcurriculum surveys. Before curriculum implementation, only 34.4% of fellows rated the quality of their ambulatory education as good or outstanding compared with 57.9% at the end of the study. Eighty-five percent of faculty and 89% of PDs rated the curriculum as good or excellent. Faculty believed that the teaching scripts were easy to use (78.4%), were factually accurate (86.3%), and provided high-yield information (82.1%). The majority of PDs indicated that the curriculum positively impacted patient care (78%) and fulfilled an unmet educational need (100%), and most planned to continue the curriculum after the study (78%). Feedback surrounded the need for updated content based on recently published guidelines and studies. Conclusion: The curriculum is a standardized and feasible way to address a previously unmet need in PCCM fellowship education. PDs rated the curriculum highly and most plan to continue it in the future. Our limited data set suggests that the curriculum was well received by fellows and faculty and positively impacted perceptions of ambulatory education and preparedness for independent practice. Future study with a larger sample of fellows is needed to better understand the generalizability of these findings.

Project description:BACKGROUND:A gap between the attitude towards evidence-based medicine (EBM), knowledge and awareness has been reported among physicians from different parts of the world. However, no investigation on Romanian physicians is available in the scientific literature. Our study aimed, firstly, to assess EBM awareness and the knowledge used by Romanian physicians, and, secondly, to compare resident trainees with specialists. METHODS:Romanian trainee and specialist physicians were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. The study tool was an online questionnaire designed to explore their awareness, knowledge, usefulness, the attitude in medical documentation, and the use of professional EBM resources. Data were collected by Google Form from January 1st to April 30th, 2017, respecting the responders' anonymity. Two groups of physicians were investigated as trainees and specialists, respectively. Descriptive statistics (number, percentage, median and interquartile range) was used to describe the survey-related variables. Statistical significance on qualitative data was calculated with the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the Z-test for proportions. RESULTS:Two hundred and 50 physicians participated in this study (68% trainees vs. 32% specialists). In both groups, a significantly high percentage was represented by women as compared to men (trainees 72.4%, specialists 70%). The correct definition of EBM was identified by most respondents (75.6%). Affirmatively, both trainees and specialists always looked at levels of evidence when reading scientific literature, but a small percentage (6.5% trainees and 3% specialists) adequately identified the uppermost types of evidence in the hierarchy. Almost a quarter of the respondents shared the name of mobile EBM resources that they used to support the daily practice. Only six out of the 49 listed mobile resources met the EBM criteria. CONCLUSIONS:The participants proved to have limited knowledge of EBM and a positive attitude towards the concept. They made use of mobile medical resources without understanding which of these were evidence-based.

Dataset Information

Self-Assessment of Preparedness among Critical Care Trainees Transitioning from Fellowship to Practice.

Publications

Self-Assessment of Preparedness among Critical Care Trainees Transitioning from Fellowship to Practice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets