Dataset Information

Genomic distinctions between metastatic lower and upper tract urothelial carcinoma revealed through rapid autopsy.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Little is known about the genomic differences between metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LTUC) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We compare genomic features of primary and metastatic UTUC and LTUC tumors in a cohort of patients with end stage disease. METHODS:We performed whole exome sequencing on matched primary and metastatic tumor samples (N=37) from 7 patients with metastatic UC collected via rapid autopsy. Inter- and intra-patient mutational burden, mutational signatures, predicted deleterious mutations, and somatic copy alterations (sCNV) were analyzed. RESULTS:We investigated 3 patients with UTUC (3 primary samples, 13 metastases) and 4 patients with LTUC (4 primary samples, 17 metastases). We found that sSNV burden was higher in metastatic LTUC compared to UTUC. Moreover, the APOBEC mutational signature was pervasive in metastatic LTUC and less so in UTUC. Despite a lower overall sSNV burden, UTUC displayed greater inter- and intra-individual genomic distances at the copy number level between primary and metastatic tumors than LTUC. Our data also indicate that metastatic UTUC lesions can arise from small clonal populations present in the primary cancer. Importantly, putative druggable mutations were found across patients with the majority shared across all metastases within a patient. CONCLUSIONS:Metastatic UTUC demonstrated a lower overall mutational burden but greater structural variability compared to LTUC. Our findings suggest that metastatic UTUC displays a greater spectrum of copy number divergence from LTUC. Importantly, we identified druggable lesions shared across metastatic samples, which demonstrate a level of targetable homogeneity within individual patients.

SUBMITTER: Winters BR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6629128 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genomic distinctions between metastatic lower and upper tract urothelial carcinoma revealed through rapid autopsy.

Winters Brian R BR De Sarkar Navonil N Arora Sonali S Bolouri Hamid H Jana Sujata S Vakar-Lopez Funda F Cheng Heather H HH Schweizer Michael T MT Yu Evan Y EY Grivas Petros P Lee John K JK Kollath Lori L Holt Sarah K SK McFerrin Lisa L Ha Gavin G Nelson Peter S PS Montgomery Robert B RB Wright Jonathan L JL Lam Hung-Ming HM Hsieh Andrew C AC

JCI insight 20190530

<h4>Background</h4>Little is known about the genomic differences between metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LTUC) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We compare genomic features of primary and metastatic UTUC and LTUC tumors in a cohort of patients with end stage disease.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed whole exome sequencing on matched primary and metastatic tumor samples (N=37) from 7 patients with metastatic UC collected via rapid autopsy. Inter- and intra-patient mutational burden, mutati ...[more]

PMID: 31145100

Similar Datasets

Project description:Despite a similar histologic appearance, upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) tumors have distinct epidemiologic and clinicopathologic differences.To investigate whether the differences between UTUC and UCB result from intrinsic biological diversity.Tumor and germline DNA from patients with UTUC (n=83) and UCB (n=102) were analyzed using a custom next-generation sequencing assay to identify somatic mutations and copy number alterations in 300 cancer-associated genes.We described co-mutation patterns and copy number alterations in UTUC. We also compared mutation frequencies in high-grade UTUC (n=59) and high-grade UCB (n=102).Comparison of high-grade UTUC and UCB revealed significant differences in the prevalence of somatic alterations. Genes altered more commonly in high-grade UTUC included FGFR3 (35.6% vs 21.6%; p=0.065), HRAS (13.6% vs 1.0%; p=0.001), and CDKN2B (15.3% vs 3.9%; p=0.016). Genes less frequently mutated in high-grade UTUC included TP53 (25.4% vs 57.8%; p<0.001), RB1 (0.0% vs 18.6%; p<0.001), and ARID1A (13.6% vs 27.5%; p=0.050). Because our assay was restricted to genomic alterations in a targeted panel, rare mutations and epigenetic changes were not analyzed.High-grade UTUC tumors display a spectrum of genetic alterations similar to high-grade UCB. However, there were significant differences in the prevalence of several recurrently mutated genes including HRAS, TP53, and RB1. As relevant targeted inhibitors are being developed and tested, these results may have important implications for the site-specific management of patients with urothelial carcinoma.Comparison of next-generation sequencing of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with urothelial bladder cancer identified that similar mutations were present in both cancer types but at different frequencies, indicating a potential need for unique management strategies. UTUC tumors were found to have a high rate of mutations that could be targeted with novel therapies.

Project description:BackgroundDifferent genomic characterization in urothelial carcinoma (UC) by site of origin may imply contrasting therapeutic opportunities and pathogenetic mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences between upper tract UC (UTUC) and UC of the bladder (UCB) result from intrinsic biological diversity.Materials and methodsWe prospectively sequenced 118 tumors and matched blood DNA from Chinese patients with UC using next-generation sequencing techniques, including 45 UTUC and 73 UCB. Two hundred twenty-six patients with UTUC and 350 patients with UCB for The Cancer Genome Atlas were acquired from the cbioportal.ResultsThere were marked disparities in the mutational landscape for UC according to race and site of origin. Signature 22 for exposure to aristolochic acid was only observed in the UTUC cohort. Conversely, signature 6 for defective DNA mismatch repair only existed in the UCB cohort. Compared with UCB, UTUC had higher clonal and subclonal mutation numbers. TP53, PIK3CA, and FGFR3 mutations may be the driver genes for UTUC, whereas for UCB, the driver gene may be BRCA1. Patients with UTUC had lower PD-L1 than those with UCB. There was no significant difference in the number of DDR mutations, copy number variation counts, and tumor mutational burden between UTUC and UCB.ConclusionUTUC and UCB exhibit significant differences in the prevalence of genomic landscape and carcinogenesis. Consequently, molecular subtypes differ according to location, and these results may imply the site-specific management of patients with urothelial carcinoma. Mutational signature may be used as a screening tool to assist clinical differential diagnosis between UTUC and UCB.Implications for practiceThis study's findings lay the foundation for a deeper understanding of distinct molecular mechanisms and similar treatment opportunities between upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and had important implications for the site-specific management of patients with urothelial carcinoma. A comprehensive understanding of the biology of UTUC and UCB is needed to identify new drug targets in order to improve clinical outcomes.

Dataset Information

Genomic distinctions between metastatic lower and upper tract urothelial carcinoma revealed through rapid autopsy.

Publications

Genomic distinctions between metastatic lower and upper tract urothelial carcinoma revealed through rapid autopsy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets