Dataset Information

One-year trial of 12-hour shifts in a non-intensive care unit and an intensive care unit in a public hospital: a qualitative study of 24 nurses' experiences.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

The aim of this study was to provide recommendations to hospital owners and employee unions about developing efficient, sustainable and safe work-hour agreements. Employees at two clinics of a hospital, one a non-intensive care and the other a newborn intensive care unit (ICU), trialled 12-hour shifts on weekends for 1?year.

Methods

We systematically recorded the experiences of 24 nurses' working 12-hour shifts, 16 in the medical unit and 8 in the ICU for 1?year. All were interviewed before, during and at the end of the trial period. The interview material was recorded, transcribed to text and coded systematically.

Results

The experiences of working 12-hour shifts differed considerably between participants, especially those in the ICU. Their individual experiences differed in terms of health consequences, effects on their family, appreciation of extra weekends off, perceived effects on patients and perceived work task flexibility.

Conclusions

The results indicate that individual preference for working 12-hour shifts is a function of own health situation, family situation, work load tolerance, degree of sleep problems, personality and other factors. If the goal is to recruit and retain nurses, nurses should be free to choose to work 12-hour shifts.

SUBMITTER: Ose SO

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6629459 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

One-year trial of 12-hour shifts in a non-intensive care unit and an intensive care unit in a public hospital: a qualitative study of 24 nurses' experiences.

Ose Solveig Osborg SO Tjønnås Maria Suong MS Kaspersen Silje Lill SL Færevik Hilde H

BMJ open 20190709 7

<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to provide recommendations to hospital owners and employee unions about developing efficient, sustainable and safe work-hour agreements. Employees at two clinics of a hospital, one a non-intensive care and the other a newborn intensive care unit (ICU), trialled 12-hour shifts on weekends for 1 year.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically recorded the experiences of 24 nurses' working 12-hour shifts, 16 in the medical unit and 8 in the ICU for 1 year. All we ...[more]

PMID: 31289050

Similar Datasets

Project description:Fatigue-related impairments in the nursing workforce contribute to a multitude of health, safety, and economic consequences at the individual, organizational and societal levels. Long and compressed work schedules are commonly worked in the healthcare industry, but more research is needed to understand the cumulative effects of multiple work shifts on physiology-based performance outcomes in nurses. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a single nursing work shift versus three compressed (one every 24 hours) 12 hour shifts on performance-based fatigue in nurses and aides. Twenty-six fulltime hospital working nurses and aides (age = 36.1 ± 13.3 years) reported to the lab for testing before, immediately after working a single 12 hour shift, and after working three 12 hour shifts in a 72 hour period. Outcome measures included vigilance-based reaction time, lapses of attention, and muscle function assessments (lower and upper body muscle strength, explosive strength and vertical jump performance). All variables except hand grip strength showed a significant decline following the three work shifts. The psychomotor vigilance reaction time and lapses of attention variables also generally showed a significant decline from the end of shift one to the end of shift three, indicting an accumulation of fatigue in these metrics with increasing number of shifts worked. Muscle function variables responded early in the duty cycle, showing a significant decline after a single work shift, but did no further decline by the end of the third shift. These findings use objective measures to substantiate that fatigue impairments occur from working a single 12 hour shift, and in several instances, increase further with more successive work shifts. Caution should be employed by personnel and administrators with work schedules involving multiple compressed 12 hour shifts. Fatigue management strategies may be used to improve risks and consequences from fatigue-related mishaps, and this study reports several variables that appear sensitive to identifying and tracking fatigue in this population.

Project description:BackgroundDue to worldwide nursing shortages and difficulty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) working in hospitals have been adopted widely. Because long shifts reduce the daily number of shifts from three to two, many assume that long shifts improve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap. However, it is unclear whether staffing levels are more likely to be perceived as adequate when more long shifts are used.ObjectivesTo investigate the association between the proportion of long (≥12-hour) shifts worked on a ward and nurses-in-charge's perceptions that the staffing level was sufficient to meet patient need.MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (patient administrative data and rosters) linked to nurses-in-charge's reports from 81 wards within four English hospitals across 1 year (2017). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to determine associations between the proportion of long shifts and nurses-in-charge's reports of having enough staff for quality or leaving necessary nursing care undone, after controlling for the staffing level relative to demand (shortfall). We tested for interactions between staffing shortfall and the proportion of long shifts.ResultsThe sample comprised 19648 ward days. On average across wards, 72% of shifts were long. With mixed short and long shifts, the odds of nurses-in-charge reporting that there were enough staff for quality were 14-17% lower than when all shifts were long. For example, the odds of reporting enough staff for quality with between 60-80% long shifts was 15% lower (95% confidence interval 2% to 27%) than with all long shifts. Associations with nursing care left undone were consistent with this pattern. Although including interactions between staffing shortfalls and the proportion of long shifts did not improve model fit, the effect of long shifts did appear to differ according to shortfall, with lower proportions of long shifts associated with benefits when staffing levels were high relative to current norms.ConclusionsRather than a clear distinction between wards using short and long shifts, we found that a mixed pattern operated on most days and wards, with no wards using all short shifts. We found that when wards use exclusively long shifts rather than a mixture, nurses-in-charge are more likely to judge that they have enough staff. However, the adverse effects of mixed shifts on perceptions of staffing adequacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher staffing levels. ISRCTN 12307968. Tweetable abstract 12-hour shifts in nursing: a mix of short and long shifts may be worse than all long shifts.

Dataset Information

One-year trial of 12-hour shifts in a non-intensive care unit and an intensive care unit in a public hospital: a qualitative study of 24 nurses' experiences.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

One-year trial of 12-hour shifts in a non-intensive care unit and an intensive care unit in a public hospital: a qualitative study of 24 nurses' experiences.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets