Dataset Information

Association Between Time to Treatment With Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated in Clinical Practice.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Randomized clinical trials suggest benefit of endovascular-reperfusion therapy for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is time dependent, but the extent to which it influences outcome and generalizability to routine clinical practice remains uncertain.

Objective

To characterize the association of speed of treatment with outcome among patients with AIS undergoing endovascular-reperfusion therapy.

Design, setting, and participants

Retrospective cohort study using data prospectively collected from January 2015 to December 2016 in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke nationwide US quality registry, with final follow-up through April 15, 2017. Participants were 6756 patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion AIS treated with endovascular-reperfusion therapy with onset-to-puncture time of 8 hours or less.

Exposures

Onset (last-known well time) to arterial puncture, and hospital arrival to arterial puncture (door-to-puncture time).

Main outcomes and measures

Substantial reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), ambulatory status, global disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) and destination at discharge, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and in-hospital mortality/hospice discharge.

Results

Among 6756 patients, the mean (SD) age was 69.5 (14.8) years, 51.2% (3460/6756) were women, and median pretreatment score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 17 (IQR, 12-22). Median onset-to-puncture time was 230 minutes (IQR, 170-305) and median door-to-puncture time was 87 minutes (IQR, 62-116), with substantial reperfusion in 85.9% (5433/6324) of patients. Adverse events were sICH in 6.7% (449/6693) of patients and in-hospital mortality/hospice discharge in 19.6% (1326/6756) of patients. At discharge, 36.9% (2132/5783) ambulated independently and 23.0% (1225/5334) had functional independence (mRS 0-2). In onset-to-puncture adjusted analysis, time-outcome relationships were nonlinear with steeper slopes between 30 to 270 minutes than 271 to 480 minutes. In the 30- to 270-minute time frame, faster onset to puncture in 15-minute increments was associated with higher likelihood of achieving independent ambulation at discharge (absolute increase, 1.14% [95% CI, 0.75%-1.53%]), lower in-hospital mortality/hospice discharge (absolute decrease, -0.77% [95% CI, -1.07% to -0.47%]), and lower risk of sICH (absolute decrease, -0.22% [95% CI, -0.40% to -0.03%]). Faster door-to-puncture times were similarly associated with improved outcomes, including in the 30- to 120-minute window, higher likelihood of achieving discharge to home (absolute increase, 2.13% [95% CI, 0.81%-3.44%]) and lower in-hospital mortality/hospice discharge (absolute decrease, -1.48% [95% CI, -2.60% to -0.36%]) for each 15-minute increment.

Conclusions and relevance

Among patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion treated in routine clinical practice, shorter time to endovascular-reperfusion therapy was significantly associated with better outcomes. These findings support efforts to reduce time to hospital and endovascular treatment in patients with stroke.

SUBMITTER: Jahan R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6635908 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Evidence for the effect of subclinical thyroid dysfunction on the prognosis of patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke and receiving reperfusion therapy remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with reperfusion therapy. Methods: One hundred fifty-six consecutively recruited patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, intraarterial thrombectomy and combined intravenous thrombolysis and intraarterial thrombectomy) were included in this prospective observational study. We divided patients with subclinical thyroid dysfunction into the following 2 groups and defined a euthyroid group: subclinical hyperthyroidism (a thyroid-stimulating hormone level <0.35 μU/mL), subclinical hypothyroidism (a thyroid-stimulating hormone level >4.94 μU/mL), and a euthyroid state (0.35 μU/mL ≤ thyroid-stimulating hormone level ≤ 4.94 μU/mL). Patients with overt thyroid dysfunction were excluded. The primary outcome was functional disability at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale, mRS), and the secondary outcome was successful reperfusion. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the primary and secondary outcomes. Results: The subclinical hyperthyroidism group appeared to have poor functional outcomes, but the differences were not significant. However, compared with patients in the euthyroid state, patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism had an increased risk of poor functional outcomes at 3 months after a stroke (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-6.14 for a mRS score of 3 to 6) and a decreased rate of successful reperfusion after reperfusion therapy (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.43). Conclusion: Subclinical hyperthyroidism may be independently associated with a poor prognosis at 3 months and unsuccessful reperfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy.

Project description:AimIn acute large vessel occlusions, endovascular therapy (EVT) achieves flow restoration in the majority of cases; however, EVT fails to achieve sufficient reperfusion in a substantial minority of patients. This study aimed to identify predictors of failed reperfusion.MethodsIn this study 2211 patients from the German Stroke Registry who received EVT for anterior circulation stroke were retrospectively analyzed. Failure of reperfusion was defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grades 0/1/2a, and sufficient reperfusion as TICI 2b/3. In 1629 patients with complete datasets, associations between failure of reperfusion and baseline clinical data, comorbidities, location of occlusion, and procedural data were assessed with multiple logistic regression.ResultsFailure of reperfusion occurred in 371 patients (16.8%) and was associated with the following locations of occlusion: cervical internal carotid artery (ICA, adjusted odds ratio, OR 2.01, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.08-3.69), intracranial ICA without carotid T occlusion (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.05-2.98), and M2 segment (adjusted OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.21-2.84). Failed reperfusion was also associated with cervical ICA stenosis (>70% stenosis, adjusted OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.69-4.97), stroke of other determined etiology by TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in acute stroke treatment) criteria (e.g. nonatherosclerotic vasculopathies, adjusted OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.36-5.39), and treatment given outside the usual working hours (adjusted OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.86). Successful reperfusion was associated with higher Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) on initial imaging (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92), treatment with the patient under general anesthesia (adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96), and concomitant ICA stenting in patients with ICA stenosis (adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.38).ConclusionSeveral factors are associated with failure of reperfusion, most notably occlusions of the proximal ICA and low ASPECTS on admission. Conversely, stent placement in the proximal ICA was associated with reperfusion success.

Project description:BackgroundNelonemdaz is a multitarget neuroprotectant that selectively blocks N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and scavenges free radicals, as proven in preclinical ischemia-reperfusion studies. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nelonemdaz in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular reperfusion therapy.MethodsThis phase II randomized trial involved participants with large-artery occlusion in the anterior circulation at baseline who received endovascular reperfusion therapy <8 hours from symptom onset at 7 referral stroke centers in South Korea between October 29, 2016, and June 1, 2020. Two hundred thirteen patients were screened and 209 patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization system. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the medication received-placebo, low-dose (2750 mg) nelonemdaz, and high-dose (5250 mg) nelonemdaz. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 at 12 weeks.ResultsTwo hundred eight patients were assigned to the placebo (n=70), low-dose (n=71), and high-dose (n=67) groups. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was achieved in 183 patients, and it did not differ among the groups (33/61 [54.1%], 40/65 [61.5%], and 36/57 [63.2%] patients; P=0.5578). The common odds ratio (90% CI) indicating a favorable shift in the modified Rankin Scale scores at 12 weeks was 1.55 (0.92-2.60) between the placebo and low-dose groups and 1.61 (0.94-2.76) between the placebo and high-dose groups. No serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThe study arms showed no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 at 12 weeks. Nevertheless, nelonemdaz-treated patients showed a favorable tendency toward achieving these scores at 12 weeks, without serious adverse effects. Thus, a large-scale phase III trial is warranted.RegistrationURL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02831088.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:This study aims to describe the relationship between computed tomographic (CT) perfusion (CTP)-to-reperfusion time and clinical and radiological outcomes, in a cohort of patients who achieve successful reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS:We included data from the CRISP (Computed Tomographic Perfusion to Predict Response in Ischemic Stroke Project) in which all patients underwent a baseline CTP scan before endovascular therapy. Patients were included if they had a mismatch on their baseline CTP scan and achieved successful endovascular reperfusion. Patients with mismatch were categorized into target mismatch and malignant mismatch profiles, according to the volume of their Tmax >10s lesion volume (target mismatch, <100 mL; malignant mismatch, >100 mL). We investigated the impact of CTP-to-reperfusion times on probability of achieving functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, 0-2) at day 90 and radiographic outcomes at day 5. RESULTS:Of 156 included patients, 108 (59%) had the target mismatch profile, and 48 (26%) had the malignant mismatch profile. In patients with the target mismatch profile, CTP-to-reperfusion time showed no association with functional independence (P=0.84), whereas in patients with malignant mismatch profile, CTP-to-reperfusion time was strongly associated with lower probability of functional independence (odds ratio, 0.08; P=0.003). Compared with patients with target mismatch, those with the malignant mismatch profile had significantly more infarct growth (90 [49-166] versus 43 [18-81] mL; P=0.006) and larger final infarct volumes (110 [61-155] versus 48 [21-99] mL; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Compared with target mismatch patients, those with the malignant profile experience faster infarct growth and a steeper decline in the odds of functional independence, with longer delays between baseline imaging and reperfusion. However, this does not exclude the possibility of treatment benefit in patients with a malignant profile.

Project description:ImportanceA significant proportion of acute ischemic strokes occur while patients are hospitalized. Limited contemporary data exist on the utilization rates of intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy for in-hospital stroke.ObjectiveTo use a national registry to examine temporal trends in the use of intravenous and endovascular reperfusion therapies for treatment of in-hospital stroke.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 267 956 patients who underwent reperfusion therapy for stroke with in-hospital or out-of-hospital onset reported in the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke national registry from January 2008 to September 2018.ExposuresIn-hospital onset vs out-of-hospital onset of stroke symptoms.Main outcomes and measuresTemporal trends in the use of reperfusion therapy, process measures of quality, and the association between functional outcomes and key patient characteristics, comorbidities, and treatments.ResultsOf 67 493 patients with in-hospital stroke onset, this study observed increased rates of vascular risk factors (standardized mean difference >10%) but no significant differences in age or sex in patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis only (mean [interquartile range {IQR}] age, 72 [80-62] y; 53.2% female) or those undergoing endovascular therapy (mean [IQR] age, 69 [59-79] y; 49.8% female). Of these patients, 10 481 (15.5%) received intravenous thrombolysis and 2494 (3.7%) underwent endovascular therapy. Compared with 2008, in 2018 the proportion of in-hospital stroke among all stroke hospital discharges was higher (3.5% vs 2.7%; P < .001), as was use of intravenous thrombolysis (19.1% vs 9.1%; P < .001) and endovascular therapy (6.4% vs 2.5%; P < .001) in patients with in-hospital stroke, with a significant increase in endovascular therapy in mid-2015 (P < .001). Compared with patients who received intravenous thrombolysis for out-of-hospital stroke onset, those with in-hospital onset were associated with longer median (IQR) times from stroke recognition to cranial imaging (33 [18-60] vs 16 [9-26] minutes; P < .001) and to thrombolysis bolus (81 [52-125] vs 60 [45-84] minutes; P < .001). In adjusted analyses, patients with in-hospital stroke onset who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis were less likely to ambulate independently at discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82; P < .001) and were more likely to die or to be discharged to hospice (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.50; P < .001) than patients with out-of-hospital onset who also received intravenous thrombolysis treatment. Comparisons among patients treated with endovascular therapy yielded similar findings.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, in-hospital stroke onset was increasingly reported and treated with reperfusion therapy. Compared with out-of-hospital stroke onset, in-hospital onset was associated with longer delays to reperfusion and worse functional outcomes, highlighting opportunities to further care for patients with in-hospital stroke onset.

Project description:Background and purposeAs endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is time-dependent, it is crucial to refer patients promptly. Current referral modes include Mothership (MS), Drip and Ship (DS) and Drive the Doctor (DD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of different referral modes on the clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke after EVT. METHODS: A total of 349 patients from 15 hospitals between April 2017 and March 2020 were enrolled. The primary outcomes include poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 6), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage transformation (sICH), mortality and cost. Regression analysis was used to assess the association of referral modes with poor outcome, sICH, mortality and cost in acute ischemic stroke patients.ResultsAmong the 349 patients, 83 were in DD group (23.78%), 85 in MS group (24.36%) and 181 in DS group (51.86%). There were statistically significant differences in intravenous thrombolysis, onset-to-door time, onset-to-puncture time, puncture-to-recanalization time, door-to-puncture time, door-to-recanalization time, and cost among the DD, MS, and DS groups (59.04% vs 35.29% vs 33.15%, P<0.001; 90 vs 166 vs 170 minutes, P<0.001; 230 vs 270 vs 270 minutes, P<0.001; 82 vs 54 vs 51 minutes, P<0.001; 110 vs 85 vs 96 minutes, P=0.004; 210 vs 146 vs 150 minutes, P<0.001; 64258 vs 80041 vs 70750 Chinese Yuan, P=0.018). In terms of sICH, mortality and poor outcome, there was no significant difference among the DD, MS, and DS groups (22.89% vs 18.82% vs 19.34%, P=0.758; 24.10% vs 24.71% vs 29.83%, P=0.521; 64.47% vs 64.71% vs 68.51%, P=0.827). The results of multiple regression analysis indicated that there was no independent correlation between different referral modes regarding sICH (ORMS: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.18, 1.38, P=0.1830; ORDS: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.19, 1.16, P=0.1000), mortality (ORMS: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.19, 1.67, P=0.2993; ORDS: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.25, 1.69, P=0.3744) and poor outcome (ORMS: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.25, 1.47, P=0.2705; ORDS: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.24, 1.18, P=0.1223). However, there was a correlation between MS group and cost (β=30449.73, 95%CI: 11022.18, 49877.29; P=0.0023). The multiple regression analysis on patients finally admitted in comprehensive stroke center (MS+DS) versus patients finally admitted in primary stroke center (DD) showed that DD mode was independently associated with lower costs (β=-19438.86, 95%CI: -35977.79, -2899.94; P=0.0219).ConclusionThere was no independent correlation between three referral modes and sICH, mortality, poor outcome correspondingly. Different referral modes can be implemented in clinical practice according to the situations encountered. Compared to MS and DS modes, DD mode is more economical.