Dataset Information

HLA-G +3142 C>G polymorphism and cancer risk: Evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) plays an important role in the development of human cancers. Several published studies have investigated the relationship between the HLA-G +3142 C>G (rs1063320) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility in different populations. However, the results have yet to reach a consensus in different types of cancers. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the HLA-G +3142 C>G polymorphism on cancer risk.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases to acquire eligible studies up to February 20, 2019. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the correlation between the HLA-G +3142 C>G polymorphism and cancer risk in a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Publication bias assessments, sensitivity analysis and stratified analyses were performed. To reduce the risk of type I error and assess whether the present evidence of the results was adequate and conclusive, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also performed.

Results

Eight case-control studies comprising 1546 cases and 1595 controls were included in the present meta-analysis. The results revealed that the HLA-G +3142 C>G mutation significantly decreased the total cancer risk in recessive comparison model and allelic comparison model. Further stratified analyses showed that the HLA-G +3142 C>G mutation significantly decreases the risk of cancer in Asian populations. No similar relationship was found in other subgroups. No publication bias was identified in our present study. Omitting a single study at a time had no significant impact on the pooled OR of the sensitivity analysis assessing the association between the HLA-G +3142 C>G polymorphism and cancer risk, which demonstrates the stability of the current meta-analysis. TSA also identified our current findings.

Conclusions

The results of our meta-analysis show that the HLA-G +3142 C>G polymorphism plays a protect role in the occurrence of human cancers, particularly in Asian populations. More case-control studies with different types of cancer in various ethnicities are needed to verify the findings.

SUBMITTER: Jiang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6636957 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: It is still conflicting for the correlation between cancer susceptibility and Aurora-A V57I (rs1047972) gene variant from the published researches. This meta-analysis was performed to access the correlation between cancer susceptibility and Aurora-A rs1047972 gene polymorphism by using meta-analysis methods. Methods: Eligible studies published before Nov 1, 2019 were systematically searched in PMC, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, in order to collect qualified case-control or cohort studies. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate the correlation between Aurora-A rs1047972 gene polymorphism and cancer risk. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine the stability of the results; Egger's test and Begg's funnel chart were used to assess possible publication bias. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to access whether the sample size of our meta-analysis was sufficient. Results: The sample set extracted from 24 case-control studies involving 35,926 subjects (14,639 cases and 21,287 controls) for the association of Aurora-A rs1047972 gene polymorphism with cancer susceptibility. In our meta-analysis, Aurora-A rs1047972 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of cancer susceptibility in overall populations (GA+GG vs. AA: P=0.039, OR=1.106; 95% CI 1.005-1.218; AA vs. GG: P=0.003, OR= 0.814; 95% CI, 0.710-0.934), and the GA/GG variant might be a risk factor for cancer susceptibility. In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, we found a significant association between Aurora-A rs1047972 variant and the susceptibility of the cancer in Caucasian population. In a subgroup analysis by cancer type, we observed a significantly increased susceptibility of lung cancer. In addition, an increased risk was found between Aurora-A rs1047972 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility in MALDI-TOF group and among population-based study (PB) patients. Our results were in a sufficiently large number of participants according to TSA and did not require more studies to confirm such association. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis revealed that the susceptibility of cancer was associated with Aurora-A rs1047972 polymorphism, especially in Caucasians. And the GA/GG variant might be a risk factor for cancer susceptibility.

Project description:Introduction: Association between Cyclin D1 (CCND1) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9344 and cancer risk is paradoxical. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the association between CCND1 variant and overall cancer risk in Indian population. Methods: Data from 12 published studies including 3739 subjects were collected using Pubmed and Embase. RevMan (Review Manager) 5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis. OR with 95%CI were calculated to establish the association. Results: Overall, the cumulative findings demonstrated that CCND1 polymorphism (rs9344) was not significantly associated with cancer risk in all the genetic models studied (dominant model: GG vs GA+AA: OR (95%CI) = 0.81 (0.60-1.09), P=0.17; recessive model: GG+GA vs AA: OR (95%CI) = 1.23 (0.96-1.59), P=0.11; co-dominant model: GG vs AA: OR (95%CI) = 1.35 (0.93-1.97), P=0.12; co-dominant model: (GG vs GA: OR (95%CI) = 1.16 (0.85-1.59), P=0.34; allelic model: A vs G: OR (95%CI) = 1.20 (1.14-2.85), P=0.23; allelic model: G vs A: OR (95%CI) = 0.83 (0.62-1.12), P=0.23). Subgroup analysis according to cancer types presented significant association of CCND1 polymorphism and increased breast cancer risk in dominant model (GG vs GA+AA: OR = 2.75, 95%CI = 1.54-4.90, P=0.0006) and allelic model (G vs A: OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.22-2.19, P=0.001). An increased esophageal cancer risk in recessive model (GG+GA vs AA: OR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.05-2.16, P=0.03) and co-dominant model (GG vs AA: OR = 2.51, 95%CI = 1.10-5.71, P=0.03) was detected. A higher risk for colorectal cancer was detected under both the co-dominant models (GG vs AA: OR = 2.46, 95%CI = 1.34-4.51, P=0.004 and GG vs GA: OR = 1.74, 95%CI = 1.14-2.67, P=0.01). However, in case of cervical cancer risk a non-significant association was reported under the recessive model (GG+GA vs AA: OR = 1.52, 95%CI = 0.60-3.90, P=0.38) with reference to CCND1 polymorphism (rs9344). The trial sequential analysis (TSA) showed that the cumulative Z-curve neither crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary nor reached the required information size (RIS). Thus, present meta-analysis remained inconclusive due to insufficient evidence. Conclusion: CCND1 polymorphism rs9344 may not have a role in overall cancer susceptibility in Indian population. However, this polymorphism acts as a crucial risk factor for breast, esophageal, and colorectal cancer but not for cervical cancer. Future studies with larger sample size are required to draw a reliable conclusion.