Dataset Information

Strategy and Efficacy of Generic and Pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Myanmar Experience.

ABSTRACT: Background:In resource-constrained areas, generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have considerably reduced the cost of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy while there remain significant costs related to the baseline and follow-up virologic assays. Aim:The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of HCV therapy in Myanmar with pan-genotypic generic DAA sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and with and without the baseline genotype testing, while the duration of treatment and use of ribavirin (RBV) was dictated by cirrhosis and prior treatment failure. Methods:Between September 2016 and June 2017, data from the 359 participants who completed treatment with SOF/VEL (± RBV) for 12-24 weeks were analyzed. Two hundred one patients did not have the baseline HCV genotype tested. Results:Regimens included SOF/VEL for 12 weeks (n = 43), SOF/VEL/RBV for 12 weeks (n = 275), or SOF/VEL/RBV for 24 weeks (n = 41). The mean age was 52 years, 44% were men (n = 159), 41 (11.4%) had a history of previous DAA therapy, 7 (1.9%) had a history of hepatocellular carcinoma, and 55 (15.3%) had cirrhosis. Overall, the sustained viral response (SVR)12 rate was 98.6% (354/359) and with a good adverse event profile. SVR rates were similar to those with and without baseline genotype testing and also across all genotypes in those who had genotype tested. Conclusions:In Myanmar, generic and pan-genotypic SOF/VEL ± RBV is a highly effective and safe treatment for HCV, regardless of the HCV genotype, and therefore, the requirement for the baseline genotype can be eliminated. Future strategies should include elimination of treatment and end of treatment HCV RNA testing to enhance treatment uptake and further reduce cost.

SUBMITTER: Bwa AH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6637231 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Strategy and Efficacy of Generic and Pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Myanmar Experience.

Bwa Aung H AH Nangia Gayatri G Win Si T S STS Maung Soe T ST Han Khin A W KAW Htar Su S SS Wine Lei Y LY Ko Wint W WW Oo Moe P MP Hlaing Naomi K T NKT Palecki Julia J Loza Bao L BL Win Khin M KM Reddy Rajender R

Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology 20181219 3

<h4>Background</h4>In resource-constrained areas, generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have considerably reduced the cost of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy while there remain significant costs related to the baseline and follow-up virologic assays.<h4>Aim</h4>The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of HCV therapy in Myanmar with pan-genotypic generic DAA sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and with and without the baseline genotype testing, while the duration of treatment and use of ribav ...[more]

PMID: 31360020

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe undertook this study to assess the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained with the use of pan-genotypic sofosbuvir (SOF) + velpatasvir (VEL) for HCV patients, as compared to the current treatment regimen under the universal free treatment scheme in Punjab state.MethodologyA Markov model depicting natural history of HCV was developed to simulate the progression of disease. Three scenarios were compared: I (Current Regimen)-use of SOF + daclatasvir (DCV) for non-cirrhotic patients and ledipasvir (LDV) or DCV with SOF ± ribavirin (RBV) according to the genotype for cirrhotic patients; II-use of SOF + DCV for non-cirrhotic patients and use of SOF+VEL for compensated cirrhotic patients (with RBV in decompensated cirrhosis patients) and III-use of SOF+VEL for both non-cirrhotic and compensated cirrhotic patients (with RBV in decompensated cirrhosis patients). The lifetime costs, life-years and QALYs were assessed for each scenario, using a societal perspective. All the future costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. Finally, the incremental cost per QALY gained was computed for each of scenario II and III, as compared to scenario I and for scenario III as compared to II. In addition, we evaluated the lifetime costs and QALYs among HCV patients for each of scenario I, II and III against the counterfactual of 'no universal free treatment scheme' scenario which involves patients purchasing care in routine setting of from public and private sector.ResultsEach of the scenarios I, II and III dominate over the no universal free treatment scheme scenario, i.e. have greater QALYs and lesser costs. The use of SOF+VEL only for cirrhotic patients (scenario II) increases QALYs by 0.28 (0.03 to 0.71) per person, and decreases the cost by ? 5,946 (? 1,198 to ? 14,174) per patient, when compared to scenario I. Compared to scenario I, scenario III leads to an increase in QALYs by 0.44 (0.14 to 1.01) per person, and is cost-neutral. While the mean cost difference between scenario III and I is-? 2,676 per patient, it ranges from a cost saving of ? 14,835 to incurring an extra cost of ? 3,456 per patient. For scenario III as compared II, QALYs increase by 0.16 (0.03 to 0.36) per person as well as costs by ? 3,086 per patient which ranges from a cost saving of ? 1,264 to incurring an extra cost of ? 6,344. Shift to scenario II and III increases the program budget by 5.5% and 60% respectively.ConclusionOverall, the use of SOF+VEL is highly recommended for the treatment of HCV infection. In comparison to the current practice (scenario I), scenario II is a dominant option. Scenario III is cost-effective as compared to scenario II at a threshold of one-time GDP per capita. If budget is an important constraint, velpatasvir should be given to HCV infected cirrhotic patients. However, if no budget constraint, universal use of velpatasvir for HCV treatment is recommended.

Project description:Background and aim For years, interferon-based treatment has been offered to patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; however, the complexity of the treatment, efficacy, and adverse effects were the primary concerns. All these concerns were addressed with the introduction of directly acting antivirals (DAAs) to treat chronic HCV. Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir are second-generation DAAs used in combination for the treatment of chronic HCV infection. The aim of our study was to determine and compare the efficacy and safety profile of the sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C with or without cirrhosis. Materials and methods This descriptive study was conducted at the Department of Medicine, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, from March 15th to September 15th, 2021 after approval from the Institution Research and Ethical Review Board (IREB). Diagnosis of HCV was based on the detection of hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) fragments by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Liver status was assessed with liver function tests and imaging. Sofosbuvir (400 mg) and velpatasvir (100 mg) were administered once daily for 12 weeks, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HCV RNA after 12 weeks of completion of treatment for determination of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). Patients with cirrhosis also received weight-based ribavirin. Adverse events experienced by the study participants during the course of treatment were recorded. Data were collected regarding patients' demographics, laboratory parameters, SVR12, and adverse events, and were then analyzed using SPSS, version 22 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). Results A total of 58 patients with cirrhosis and 58 patients without cirrhosis with chronic HCV were enrolled. The rate of SVR12 in patients with cirrhosis was 89.7% (52 patients achieved SVR12), compared to 98.3% in patients without cirrhosis (57 patients achieved SVR12). Subgroup analysis of patients with cirrhosis revealed that patients who have failed to achieve SVR12 were mostly males, had prolonged disease duration, and low hemoglobin at baseline; however, the association of these factors with SVR12 was not significant. The incidence of adverse events among all study participants was 46.5%. Among the cirrhotic cohort, 37 (63.8%) patients experienced adverse events, while only 17 (29.3%) patients among the non-cirrhotic cohort had adverse events. A total of 24 patients with cirrhosis (41.37%) reported mild complaints. The most commonly reported adverse event was gastrointestinal (GI) upsets (46.2%), followed by fatigue (33.9%), while 19.9% developed miscellaneous adverse events such as headaches, rash, and insomnia. Conclusion The combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir is highly effective and safe in patients with HCV with or without cirrhosis. However, this combination's efficacy was slightly higher in non-cirrhotic patients (98.3%) than in cirrhotic patients (89.7%).

Project description:Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 is the most prevalent HCV infection in China. Sofosbuvir-based direct antiviral agent (DAA) regimens are the current mainstays of treatment. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) regimens became reimbursable in China in 2020. Thus, this study aimed to identify the optimal SOF-based regimen and to inform efficient use of healthcare resources by optimizing DAA use in treating HCV genotype 1. Methods and Models: A modeling-based cost-utility analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective targeting adult Chinese patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. Direct medical costs and health utilities were inputted into a Markov model to simulate lifetime experiences of chronically infected HCV patients after receiving SOF/LDV, SOF/VEL or the traditional strategy of pegylated interferon (pegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV). Discounted lifetime cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were computed and compared to generate the incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR). An ICUR below the threshold of 31,500 $/QALY suggests cost-effectiveness. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of model findings. Results: Both SOF/LDV and SOF/VEL regimens were dominant to the pegIFN + RBV regimen by creating more QALYs and incurring less cost. SOF/LDV produced 0.542 more QALYs but cost $10,390 less than pegIFN + RBV. Relative to SOF/LDV, SOF/VEL had an ICUR of 168,239 $/QALY which did not meet the cost-effectiveness standard. Therefore SOF/LDV was the optimal strategy. These findings were robust to linear and random variations of model parameters. However, reducing the SOF/VEL price by 40% would make this regimen the most cost-effective option. Conclusions: SOF/LDV was found to be the most cost-effective treatment, and SOF/VEL was also economically dominant to pegIFN + RBV. These findings indicated that replacing pegIFN + RBV with DAA regimens could be a promising strategy.

Dataset Information

Strategy and Efficacy of Generic and Pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Myanmar Experience.

Publications

Strategy and Efficacy of Generic and Pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Myanmar Experience.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets