Dataset Information

Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-Multicenter analysis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND/AIM:We assessed suitable factors indicating newly developed lenvatinib (LEN) treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) by investigating real-world clinical features of patients. MATERIALS/METHODS:One hundred fifty two u-HCC patients, who receive LEN treatment from March to December 2018, were enrolled. (Child-Pugh score [CPS] 5/6/7/8 = 76/61/13/2, modified albumin-bilirubin grade [mALBI] 1/2a/2b/3 = 53/35/60/4). Clinical features were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS:Overall-response rate (ORR)/disease control rate (DCR) at 1 month after starting LEN were 38.7%/86.0%, respectively. Estimated median time to progression (TTP) was 7.0 months, while median survival time was not reached within the observation period. CPS (?7) and past history of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) were not significant prognostic factors. mALBI ?2b was an only significant prognostic factor (HR 4.632, 95%CI 1.649-13.02, P = 0.004) in Cox-hazard multivariate analysis. In patients with Child-Pugh A, c-index/Akaike's information criterion (AIC) of prognostic predictive value of mALBI were superior to CPS (0.682/135.6 vs 0.652/138.7), while those of stopping LEN also showed that mALBI was better (0.575/447.3 vs 0.562/447.8). Additional analysis of patients with good mALBI (1/2a) revealed that time to stopping LEN was significantly shorter in those with the adverse event (AE) of appetite loss (any grade) than those without (P = 0.006) and body mass index (BMI) was also lower in patients with that AE (20.3 ± 3.0 vs 23.6 ± 4.0kg/m2 , P < 0.001), while patients with a hand-foot skin reaction (any grade) showed good ORR/DCR (59.1%/86.4%) and longer TTP as compared to patients without (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION:Good hepatic function (mALBI 1/2a) is the best indication for LEN, while potential appetite loss in association with low BMI should be kept in mind in such cases.

SUBMITTER: Hiraoka A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6639201 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-Multicenter analysis.

Hiraoka Atsushi A Kumada Takashi T Atsukawa Masanori M Hirooka Masashi M Tsuji Kunihiko K Ishikawa Toru T Takaguchi Koichi K Kariyama Kazuya K Itobayashi Ei E Tajiri Kazuto K Shimada Noritomo N Shibata Hiroshi H Ochi Hironori H Tada Toshifumi T Toyoda Hidenori H Nouso Kazuhiro K Tsutsui Akemi A Nagano Takuya T Itokawa Norio N Hayama Korenobu K Imai Michitaka M Joko Kouji K Koizumi Yohei Y Hiasa Yoichi Y Michitaka Kojiro K Kudo Masatoshi M

Cancer medicine 20190524 8

<h4>Background/aim</h4>We assessed suitable factors indicating newly developed lenvatinib (LEN) treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) by investigating real-world clinical features of patients.<h4>Materials/methods</h4>One hundred fifty two u-HCC patients, who receive LEN treatment from March to December 2018, were enrolled. (Child-Pugh score [CPS] 5/6/7/8 = 76/61/13/2, modified albumin-bilirubin grade [mALBI] 1/2a/2b/3 = 53/35/60/4). Clinical features were evaluated retrosp ...[more]

PMID: 31127698

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLenvatinib and lenvatinib-based combination treatments are widely used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in clinical practice, but their curative effect and safety need further study in the real world.MethodsThis was a retrospective study involving patients with uHCC receiving lenvatinib monotherapy and lenvatinib-based combination treatment between Nov, 2018 and Sep, 2020 in Nanfang Hospital. Efficacy was evaluated with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and graded. Efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy were compared. Stratified analysis was performed according to systemic line of treatment and medication regimen for combination therapy.ResultsFor lenvatinib monotherapy (n = 39), OS and PFS were 80 weeks and 24.3 weeks, respectively. For combination treatment (n = 72), median OS and PFS were 99 weeks and 45.6 weeks, respectively. OS, PFS, and TTP for patients in the combination treatment cohort were significantly longer compared to those of patients in the monotreatment cohort (OS: P = 0.04, PFS: P = 0.003; TTP, P = 0.005). The incidence of TRAEs could be controlled both in the monotherapy cohort and the combination treatment cohort. In the monotherapy cohort, OS and PFS were significantly decreased in the second-line treatment group compared with the first-line treatment group, while no differences were observed in the combination cohort. The efficacy of triple therapy (lenvatinib plus PD-1 antibody plus TACE or HAIF) was similar to lenvatinib plus PD-1 antibody or lenvatinib plus TACE or HAIF.ConclusionsOur real-world study showed that lenvatinib monotherapy and lenvatinib-based combination therapy were well tolerated, with encouraging efficacies in patients with uHCC. Lenvatinib-based combination therapy showed a better curative effect compared with lenvatinib single-agent therapy. In patients who have failed first-line TKI treatment, lenvatinib-based combination therapy may be a better choice than lenvatinib single-agent therapy. Lenvatinib-based triple therapy may not have an advantage over dual therapy.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with programmed death receptor-1 signaling inhibitors plus transarterial chemoembolization (LePD1-TACE) for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in a real-world setting in China.MethodsThis was a retrospective study involving consecutive patients with uHCC (n =114) receiving LePD1-TACE treatment from June 2019 to May 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated to evaluate the antitumor efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed to assess the safety profiles. In addition, we also evaluated prognostic factors related to survival and disease progression.ResultsA total of 114 patients with a median age of 53 years were analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.5 -12.8). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median OS was 18.0 months (95% CI: 14.1 - Not reached), the median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.6 - 12.4). Based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the best ORR was 69.3% and DCR was 80.7%. Almost all patients suffered from TRAEs, the most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were hypertension (8.8%), proteinuria (3.6%), hyperbilirubinemia (1.8%), leukopenia (4.4%) and alanine aminotransferase elevation (3.6%) across all patients. The independent treatment factors associated with OS and PFS were tumor number, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the early tumor response. In the early tumor response (CR+PR) patients, median OS and PFS were 25.1 months (95% CI: 13.8 - Not reached) and 15.2 months (95% CI: 10.5 - 19.1). The patients with tumor number < 3 had a superior median OS and PFS (25.1, 16.4 months) compared to patients with tumor number ≥ 3 (14.1 months, P = 0.012; 6.6 months, P = 0.007). The patients with NLR ≤ 2.165 had a longer median OS and PFS (Not reached, 15.2 months) than those with NLR > 2.165 (17.7 months, P = 0.003; 7.5 months, P = 0.047).ConclusionIn this real-world study, LePD1-TACE triple therapy showed encouraging efficiency and manageable safety in patients with uHCC. The tumor number (< 3), NLR (≤ 2.165) and early tumor response (CR+PR) could be one of the prognostic markers.

Project description:On August 16, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved lenvatinib (Lenvima, Eisai Inc.) for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Approval was based on an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial (REFLECT; NCT01761266) conducted in 954 patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable HCC. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive lenvatinib (12 mg orally once daily for patients with a baseline body weight ?60 kg and 8 mg orally once daily for patients with a baseline body weight <60 kg) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until radiological disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. REFLECT demonstrated that lenvatinib was noninferior but not statistically superior to sorafenib for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio, [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.79-1.06), with median OS of 13.6 and 12.3 months in the lenvatinib and sorafenib arms, respectively. REFLECT also demonstrated statistically significant improvements in investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.77]; p <?0.001), corresponding to median PFS of 7.4 and 3.7 months and overall response rate of 24.1% vs 9.2% per modified RECIST for HCC (mRECIST) in the lenvatinib and sorafenib arms, respectively. Consistent results were observed by an independent review facility per RECISTv1.1 and per mRECIST. The most common adverse reactions observed in the lenvatinib-treated patients (?20%) in decreasing frequency were hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, decreased appetite, arthralgia/myalgia, decreased weight, abdominal pain, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, proteinuria, dysphonia, hemorrhagic events, hypothyroidism, and nausea. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article describes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's review of data from a single trial, REFLECT, that supported the approval of lenvatinib, as a single agent, for the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). REFLECT was an open-label, noninferiority trial that randomized 954 patients with HCC who were ineligible for liver-directed therapy with no prior systemic therapy for HCC to lenvatinib or sorafenib. REFLECT demonstrated that lenvatinib-treated patients had similar survival, more responses, and longer time to progression than those receiving sorafenib. Serious side effects were more common among lenvatinib-treated patients. Lenvatinib is an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated HCC.

Dataset Information

Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-Multicenter analysis.

Publications

Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-Multicenter analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets