Dataset Information

Disparate diagnostic accuracy of lung function tests as predictors of poor asthma control in children.

ABSTRACT: Rationale: In practice, asthma control is assessed according to symptom burden and office spirometry. However, spirometry poorly tests peripheral lung function, which may be abnormal in asthma. Impluse oscillometry (IOS) and multiple-breath washout (MBW) are novel methods which measure reactance (X5) and ventilation heterogeneity (VH) in the peripheral lung, but how well these tests reflect asthma control is poorly understood. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of tests of large airways caliber (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, R20), peripheral zone properties (X5, VH), and airways inflammation (FeNO) as predictors of poor control in asthmatic children (44 poorly controlled/10 controlled). Methods: 54 children enriched in severe asthma completed a symptom-based control scale (ACT/cACT) and lung function tests after overnight bronchodilator withhold. The accuracy of each variable to predict poor control was ranked by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity and specificity. Results: Among measures of large airways caliber, the FEV1% had the highest ROC curve area, with low sensitivity but perfect specificity. Among measures of peripheral lung function, X5 and VH in the conducting zone had fair curve areas with higher sensitivity but lower specificity compared to the FEV1%. VH in the acinar zone and FeNO both had poor accuracy. Conclusion: Tests of large airway and peripheral zone lung function performed disparately as predictors of poor control in a sample of children enriched in severe asthma. Further studies in a larger sample with more diverse phenotypic features are necessary to validate this preliminary conclusion.

SUBMITTER: Smith CJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6642863 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Disparate diagnostic accuracy of lung function tests as predictors of poor asthma control in children.

Smith Clyde J CJ Spaeder Michael C MC Sorkness Ronald L RL Teague W Gerald WG

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma 20190121 3

<i>Rationale</i>: In practice, asthma control is assessed according to symptom burden and office spirometry. However, spirometry poorly tests peripheral lung function, which may be abnormal in asthma. Impluse oscillometry (IOS) and multiple-breath washout (MBW) are novel methods which measure reactance (X5) and ventilation heterogeneity (VH) in the peripheral lung, but how well these tests reflect asthma control is poorly understood. <i>Objective</i>: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of tests ...[more]

PMID: 30663912

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCryptosporidiosis is a common cause of diarrhoea in young children (aged younger than 24 months) in low-resource settings but is currently challenging to diagnose. Light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy with auramine-phenol staining (LED-AP), recommended for tuberculosis testing, can also detect Cryptosporidium species. A lateral-flow test not requiring refrigerator storage (by contrast with most immunochromatographic lateral-flow assays) has also recently been developed for Cryptosporidium spp detection. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and operational feasibility of LED-AP and the lateral-flow test strip for cryptosporidiosis in children.MethodsWe did a prospective diagnostic accuracy study in two health-care facilities in Ethiopia, in a consecutive series of children younger than 5 years of age with diarrhoea (three or more loose stools within the previous 24 h) or dysentery (at least one loose stool with stains of blood within the previous 24 h). Stool samples were tested for Cryptosporidium spp by LED-AP and the lateral-flow test strip; accuracy of each test was estimated by independent and blind comparison with a composite reference standard comprising quantitative immunofluorescent antibody test (qIFAT), ELISA, and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Quantitative cutoff values for diarrhoea-associated infection were established in an embedded case-control substudy, with cases of cryptosporidiosis coming from the 15 districts in and around Jimma and the eight districts surrounding Serbo, and community controls without diarrhoea in the previous 48 h recruited by weekly frequency matching by geographical district of the household, age group, and enrolment week.FindingsStool samples from 912 children with diarrhoea or dysentery and 706 controls from the case-control substudy were tested between Dec 22, 2016, and July 6, 2018. Estimated reference-standard cutoff values for cryptosporidiosis positivity were 2·3 × 105 DNA copies per g of wet stool for qPCR, and 725 oocysts per g for qIFAT. LED-AP had a sensitivity for cryptosporidiosis of 88% (95% CI 79-94; 66 of 75 samples) and a specificity of 99% (98-99; 717 of 726 samples); the lateral-flow test strip had a sensitivity of 89% (79-94; 63 of 71 samples) and a specificity of 99% (97-99; 626 of 635 samples).InterpretationLED-AP has high sensitivity and specificity for cryptosporidiosis and should be considered as a dual-use technology that can be easily integrated with existing laboratory infrastructures in low-resource settings. The lateral-flow test strip has similar sensitivity and specificity and provides an alternative that does not require microscopy, although purchase cost of the test strip is unknown as it is not yet available on the market.FundingNorwegian Research Council GLOBVAC fund, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Norwegian Society for Medical Microbiology, University of Bergen, and Vestfold Hospital Trust.

Project description:Overall accuracy measures of medical tests are often used with unclear interpretations. To develop methods of calculating the overall accuracy of medical tests in the patient population. Algebraic equations based on Bayes' theorem. A new approach is proposed for calculating overall accuracy in the patient population. Examples and applications using published data are presented. The overall accuracy is the proportion of the correct test results. We introduce a clear distinction between the overall accuracy measures of medical tests that are aimed at the detection of a disease in a screening of populations for public health purposes in the general population and the overall accuracy measures of tests aimed at determining a diagnosis in individuals in a clinical setting. We show that the overall detection accuracy measure is obtained in a specific study that explores test accuracy among persons with known diagnoses and may be useful for public health screening tests. It is different from the overall diagnostic accuracy that could be calculated in the clinical setting for the evaluation of medical tests aimed at determining the individual patients' diagnoses. We show that the overall detection accuracy is constant and is not affected by the prevalence of the disease. In contrast, the overall diagnostic accuracy changes and is dependent on the prevalence. Moreover, it ranges according to the ratio between the sensitivity and specificity. Thus, when the sensitivity is greater than the specificity, the overall diagnostic accuracy increases with increasing prevalence, and vice versa, that is, when the sensitivity is lower than the specificity, the overall diagnostic accuracy decreases with increasing prevalence so that another test might be more useful for diagnostic procedures. Our paper suggests a new and more appropriate methodology for estimating the overall diagnostic accuracy of any medical test. This may be important for helping clinicians avoid errors.

Dataset Information

Disparate diagnostic accuracy of lung function tests as predictors of poor asthma control in children.

Publications

Disparate diagnostic accuracy of lung function tests as predictors of poor asthma control in children.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets