Dataset Information

XEN Gel Stent Early Failure-dye-enhanced Ab-externo Revision.

ABSTRACT: The XEN gel stent is an ab-interno minimally invasive glaucoma surgery device that reduces intraocular pressure by creating a subconjunctival drainage pathway. XEN intents to provide a safer and less invasive mean of lowering intraocular pressure. As with any new device, there is still some lack of experience and knowledge concerning efficacy, technique, and complications. We report a novel surgical approach for early bleb failure after XEN implantation. How to cite this article:Ferreira NP, Pinto JM, Teixeira F, Pinto LA. XEN Gel Stent Early Failure-dye-enhanced Ab-externo Revision. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12(3):139-141.

SUBMITTER: Ferreira NP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6647823 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

XEN Gel Stent Early Failure-dye-enhanced Ab-externo Revision.

Ferreira Nuno P NP Pinto Joana M JM Teixeira Filipa F Pinto Luís A LA

Journal of current glaucoma practice 20180901 3

The XEN gel stent is an ab-interno minimally invasive glaucoma surgery device that reduces intraocular pressure by creating a subconjunctival drainage pathway. XEN intents to provide a safer and less invasive mean of lowering intraocular pressure. As with any new device, there is still some lack of experience and knowledge concerning efficacy, technique, and complications. We report a novel surgical approach for early bleb failure after XEN implantation.<h4>How to cite this article</h4>Ferreira ...[more]

PMID: 31354206

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:The Xen® Gel Stent (Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) is a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery device implanted to reduce intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma. The stents can fail to drain post-operatively due to scarring of the conjunctiva around the stent opening. Data on the success rates of revision surgery in patients with Xen stent failure are scarce. We present the first detailed report of the steps, outcomes and complications of Xen revision surgery with 12 months of follow-up data. METHODS:We share our experiences on the circumstances in which to perform Xen revision surgery, the steps of the surgery and the results of a retrospective interventional case series of all Xen revisions performed at a single centre from 2013 to 2018. RESULTS:A total of 151 Xen implants were inserted into eyes at our tertiary centre during the study period, of which 21 eyes (patients) underwent revision surgery. Mean pre-operative IOP was 26.1 (standard deviation 8.3) mmHg with the patient on two drops of anti-glaucoma medication. Four patients were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete data (medical records were unavailable for 2 patients; 1 patient died shortly after surgery; and 1 patient moved to another area). A non-functioning Xen implant was identified in another patient during revision surgery, and the procedure was converted to a trabeculectomy. The remaining 16 patients were included in the analysis, all of whom had a minimum follow-up of 12 months, with the longest follow-up being 4 years following revision surgery. Of these 16 patients, four required needling and 5-fluorouracil injection in the first 12 months following revision surgery, three required further glaucoma drainage surgery due to the failure of the revision surgery to control IOP in the first year and one suffered bleb-related endophthalmitis at the site of previous trabeculectomy surgery. Mean IOP at 12 months following revision surgery was 16.3 (standard deviation 3.7) mmHg on 0.7 drops of anti-glaucoma medication, which equates to a 37.5% reduction in IOP and a 65% reduction in the amount of IOP-lowering drops required. CONCLUSION:Our study shares experience on when to perform Xen revision surgery and the steps required. The results of our small cohort are the first in the literature and show that revisions can achieve promising IOP and medication reductions. Some patients still require needling in the post-operative period to optimise outcomes.

Project description:PurposeThe outer stent lumen can be located either deeper (in or under Tenon's layer) or more superficially in the conjunctival stroma after the transscleral XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent (XEN-GGM; Allergan Plc., USA) implantation. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the postoperative conjunctival implant position on surgical success and intraocular pressure (IOP) after XEN-GGM.MethodsProspective data from 66 consecutive open-angle glaucoma eyes of 54 patients were collected preoperatively and 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The layer of implantation was determined in the first month postoperatively as intra- and subtenon or intraconjunctival depending on the location of the outer lumen of the stent in OCT (Visante OCT; Zeiss, Germany). Primary outcome measures were differences in relative IOP reduction at 12 months between the two groups. Further, complete and qualified surgical success, number of secondary needlings and number of IOP-lowering medications and absolute IOP were assessed.ResultsRelative IOP reduction was higher in intra- and subtenon group (n = 37/66, 56%) at week 1 (-54% versus -19%, p < 0.001), week 2 (-39% versus -21%, p = 0.02), month 1 (-42% versus -28%, p = 0.035) and month 12 (-39% versus -24%, p = 0.024). The mean absolute IOP was lower in intra- and subtenon group at week 1 (10.8 [95%CI, 8.8-14.1] versus 16.6 [95%CI, 14.1-19.0] mmHg, p < 0.001) and months 12 (13.9 [95%CI, 12.4-15.4] versus 16.7 [95%CI, 14.6-18.8] mmHg, p = 0.041). At month 6, a lower burden for IOP-lowering medication was shown for the intra- and subtenon group (0.2 ± 0.5 versus 1.0 ± 1.1, p = 0.034). The mean number of secondary needlings, which were done in 47/66 (71%) of the eyes, was lower in the intra- and subtenon group in the first year (1.9 ± 1.7 versus 1.2 ± 1.2, p = 0.03). Qualified surgical success was higher in the intra- and subtenon group (90% versus 61%, p = 0.01) after 1 year.ConclusionThe present study demonstrates a higher efficacy achieved with lower secondary needling rates in deeper implant positions in conjunctiva after XEN-GGM.

Dataset Information

XEN Gel Stent Early Failure-dye-enhanced Ab-externo Revision.

Publications

XEN Gel Stent Early Failure-dye-enhanced Ab-externo Revision.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure