Dataset Information

Adoption of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Across the United States.

ABSTRACT: Background:Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing a potentially curative therapy for patients who are nonsurgical candidates. This study describes the adoption of SBRT vs other treatment options across the United States, as well as commonly used dose-fractionation regimens. Methods:We analyzed patients in the National Cancer Data Base. A total of 107?233 stage IA NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2013 were included. We described the proportions of patients who received different surgical and radiation treatment options by year. A multivariable model was constructed to assess factors associated with patients receiving SBRT. In patients who received SBRT, we described the proportion of patients who received common dose/fractionation regimens. Results:Use of SBRT increased from 6.7% to 16.3% from 2008 to 2013, with a corresponding decrease in lobectomy/pneumonectomy (49.5% to 43.7%). The rates of wedge resection, conventional radiotherapy, and no treatment remained relatively constant. Adoption of SBRT was lowest in small community centers (8.6% of patients by 2013). On multivariable analysis, older age and treatment at larger centers were associated with higher SBRT receipt, and black race and higher comorbidity were associated with lower SBRT receipt. There was statistically significant geographic variation. Common SBRT schemes were 10?Gy × 5 (19%), 18-20?Gy × 3 (31%), and 12?Gy × 4 (16%). Conclusions:SBRT adoption has been modest over time and has not substantially replaced less curative treatments. Lack of access to this technology in smaller cancer centers may have partly contributed to the slow adoption.

SUBMITTER: Holmes JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6649706 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adoption of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Across the United States.

Holmes Jordan A JA Zagar Timothy M TM Chen Ronald C RC

JNCI cancer spectrum 20170901 1

<h4>Background</h4>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing a potentially curative therapy for patients who are nonsurgical candidates. This study describes the adoption of SBRT vs other treatment options across the United States, as well as commonly used dose-fractionation regimens.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed patients in the National Cancer Data Base. A total of 107 233 stage IA NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2008 to 20 ...[more]

PMID: 31360829

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Approximately 20% resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are treated non-surgically due to various reasons. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with stage IA NSCLC who were ineligible for surgery using the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results (SEER) Database. Methods: Using the SEER registry, we identified a total of 6,195 IA NSCLC patients who received SBRT or RFA between 2004 and 2015 because of ineligibility for surgical resection due to various reasons. Complete clinical information was available in all these patients. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between RFA and SBRT groups by using propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), and overlap weighting analysis. Additionally, an exploratory analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of RFA treatment based on the subsets of clinically relevant patients. Results: Of the 6,195 nonsurgical IA NSCLC patients, 191 patients (3.1%) received RFA and the other 6,004 patients (96.9%) received SBRT. The one-, three- and five-year OS in the unmatched RFA and SBRT groups were 83.3%, 48.5%and 29.1% vs. 83.8%, 48.3% and 27.4%, respectively, there was similar results in the PSM, IPTW, overlap weighing analysis. Nonsurgical IA NSCLC patients receiving RFA seemed to have better five-year survival than those receiving SBRT, though the difference was not statistically significant (OS, HR; 0.986; 95% CI, 0.827-1.175, P=0.8738; CSS, HR; 0.965; 95% CI, 0.765-1.219, P=0.7663). We found that the odds of receiving RFA decreased with larger tumor size (>2, <3 cm, OR; 0.303; 95% CI, 0.191-0.479; >3 cm, OR; 0.153; 95% CI, 0.093-0.251) compared with tumor size <1 cm. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving RFA seemed to have better OS than those receiving SBRT, though the difference was not statistically significant. This specific trend was even more obvious in patients with tumors <1cm in diameter (P=0.1577). Conclusion: In comparison with SBRT, RFA did not seem to adversely affect CSS and OS of IA NSCLC patients who were not suitable for surgical treatment. In addition, RFA seemed to offer better survival to IA NSCLC patients, especially those with tumors <1 cm.

Project description:ObjectivesTo compare patterns of care and overall survival (OS) between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and percutaneous local tumor ablation (LTA) for non-surgically managed early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2014 for adults with non-metastatic, node-negative invasive adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with primary tumor size ≤5.0 cm who did not undergo surgery or chemotherapy and received SBRT or LTA. Patterns of care were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. After propensity-score weighting with generalized boosted regression, OS was assessed with univariate and doubly-robust multivariate Cox regression.ResultsOf 15,792 patients, 14,651 (93%) received SBRT and 1141 (7%) received LTA. Increasing age (OR 1.01, p = .035), treatment at an academic institution (OR 2.94, p < .001), increasing tumor size (OR 1.05, p < .001), and more recent year of diagnosis (OR 1.43, p < .001) were predictive of treatment with SBRT, whereas comorbidities (OR 0.74, p = .003) and treatment at a high-volume facility (OR 0.05, p < .001) were predictive for LTA. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months, SBRT was associated with improved OS relative to LTA within a propensity-score weighted doubly-robust multivariate analysis (HR 0.71, p < .001). On weighted subgroup analyses, improved OS was observed with SBRT for tumor sizes >2.0 cm (HR 0.72, p < .001) and for those treated at high-volume facilities (HR 0.71, p < .001). No OS difference was found with SBRT or LTA in tumor sizes ≤2.0 cm (HR 0.90, p = .227).ConclusionWithin the NCDB, SBRT was more commonly utilized and was associated with improved OS when compared to percutaneous LTA for patients with non-surgically managed early-stage NSCLC. Patients with small tumor volumes likely represent an appropriate population for future prospective randomized comparisons between SBRT and LTA.

Dataset Information

Adoption of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Across the United States.

Publications

Adoption of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Across the United States.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets