Dataset Information

CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

CYP2D6 bioactivates codeine and tramadol, with intermediate and poor metabolizers (IMs and PMs) expected to have impaired analgesia. This pragmatic proof-of-concept trial tested the effects of CYP2D6-guided opioid prescribing on pain control.

Methods

Participants with chronic pain (94% on an opioid) from seven clinics were enrolled into CYP2D6-guided (n = 235) or usual care (n = 135) arms using a cluster design. CYP2D6 phenotypes were assigned based on genotype and CYP2D6 inhibitor use, with recommendations for opioid prescribing made in the CYP2D6-guided arm. Pain was assessed at baseline and 3 months using PROMIS^® measures.

Results

On stepwise multiple linear regression, the primary outcome of composite pain intensity (composite of current pain and worst and average pain in the past week) among IM/PMs initially prescribed tramadol/codeine (n = 45) had greater improvement in the CYP2D6-guided versus usual care arm (-1.01 ± 1.59 vs. -0.40 ± 1.20; adj P = 0.016); 24% of CYP2D6-guided versus 0% of usual care participants reported ≥30% (clinically meaningful) reduction in the composite outcome. In contrast, among normal metabolizers prescribed tramadol or codeine at baseline, there was no difference in the change in composite pain intensity at 3 months between CYP2D6-guided (-0.61 ± 1.39) and usual care (-0.54 ± 1.69) groups (adj P = 0.540).

Conclusion

These data support the potential benefits of CYP2D6-guided pain management.

SUBMITTER: Smith DM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6650382 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial.

Smith D Max DM Weitzel Kristin W KW Elsey Amanda R AR Langaee Taimour T Gong Yan Y Wake Dyson T DT Duong Benjamin Q BQ Hagen Melanie M Harle Christopher A CA Mercado Elvira E Nagoshi Ying Y Newsom Kimberly K Wright Ashleigh A Rosenberg Eric I EI Starostik Petr P Clare-Salzler Michael J MJ Schmidt Siegfried O SO Fillingim Roger B RB Johnson Julie A JA Cavallari Larisa H LH

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 20190123 8

<h4>Purpose</h4>CYP2D6 bioactivates codeine and tramadol, with intermediate and poor metabolizers (IMs and PMs) expected to have impaired analgesia. This pragmatic proof-of-concept trial tested the effects of CYP2D6-guided opioid prescribing on pain control.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants with chronic pain (94% on an opioid) from seven clinics were enrolled into CYP2D6-guided (n = 235) or usual care (n = 135) arms using a cluster design. CYP2D6 phenotypes were assigned based on genotype and CYP2D6 ...[more]

PMID: 30670877

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSeveral opioids have pharmacogenomic associations impacting analgesic efficacy. However, germline pharmacogenomic testing is not routinely incorporated into supportive oncology. We hypothesized that CYP2D6 profiling would correlate with opioid prescribing and hospitalizations.Materials and methodsWe analyzed 61,572 adult oncology patients from 2012 to 2018 for opioid exposures. CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (ultra-rapid [UM], normal metabolizer [NM], intermediate [IM], or poor [PM]), the latter two of which may cause inefficacy of codeine, tramadol, and standard-dose hydrocodone, was determined for patients genotyped for reasons unrelated to pain. The primary endpoint was number of opioid medications received during longitudinal care (IM/PMs vs. NMs). Secondary endpoint was likelihood of pain-related hospital encounters.ResultsMost patients with cancer (n = 34,675, 56%) received multiple opioids (average 2.8 ± 1.6/patient). Hydrocodone was most commonly prescribed (62%), followed by tramadol, oxycodone, and codeine. In the CYP2D6 genotyped cohort (n = 105), IM/PMs received a similar number of opioids (3.4 ± 1.4) as NMs (3.3 ± 1.9). However, IM/PMs were significantly more likely to experience pain-related hospital encounters compared with NMs, independent of other variables (odds ratio [OR] = 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-23.6; p = .03). IM/PMs were also more likely to be treated with later-line opioids that do not require CYP2D6 metabolism, such as morphine and hydromorphone (OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-9.8; p = .03).ConclusionCYP2D6 genotype may identify patients with cancer at increased risk for inadequate analgesia when treated with typical first-line opioids like codeine, tramadol, or standard-dose hydrocodone. Palliative care considerations are an integral part of optimal oncology care, and these findings justify prospective evaluation of preemptive genotyping as a strategy to improve oncology pain management.Implications for practiceGenomic variation in metabolic enzymes can predispose individuals to inefficacy when receiving opioid pain medications. Patients with intermediate and/or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer status do not adequately convert codeine, tramadol, and hydrocodone into active compounds, with resulting increased risk of inadequate analgesia. This study showed that patients with cancer frequently receive CYP2D6-dependent opioids. However, patients with CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizer status had increased numbers of pain-related hospitalizations and more frequently required the potent non-CYP2D6 opioids morphine and hydromorphone. This may reflect inadequate initial analgesia with the common "first-line" CYP2D6-metabolized opioids. Preemptive genotyping to guide opioid prescribing during cancer care may improve pain-related patient outcomes.

Project description:IntroductionThiopurine drugs are purine nucleoside analogues used for treatment of different immune-related conditions. To date, different studies highlighted the importance of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping in patients who initiate treatment with thiopurines to make an adequate dose adjustment. We aimed to investigate the influence of TPMT phenotype, concomitant treatments, and demographic characteristics on the incidence of adverse reactions (ADRs) in patients who start treatment with azathioprine (AZA).MethodsThis was an observational and retrospective study. The study population comprised 109 patients who started treatment with AZA following routine TPMT genotyping before June 2019 and who were routinely followed up at Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. The incidence of ADRs and treatment duration were evaluated according to TPMT phenotype.ResultsForty-five men and 64 women were recruited, with a mean age of 67.6 ± 18.5. The medical specialty with the most requests was dermatology (45.9%) and the most frequent disease for which genotyping was requested was bullous pemphigoid (27.5%). All patients were normal metabolizers (NM), except for eight intermediate metabolizers (IM) (7.3%); no poor metabolizers (PM) were found. The initial azathioprine dose was subtherapeutic in both groups (103.2 ± 45.4 mg in NMs and 75 ± 32.3 mg in IMs), increasing during the first months of treatment, especially in NMs (120.3 ± 41.3 vs. 78.6 ± 30.4 mg in IMs, p = 0.011). Most patients (73.4%) received corticosteroids to keep the disease under control; and for 41.2% of NMs, physicians were able to reduce the dose at 6 months post treatment. No IMs completed 6 months of treatment. Hepatotoxicity, gastric intolerance, and blood disorders were the most common ADRs. The incidence of ADRs in the sample was 28.4% (n = 31) with a similar trend between IMs (37.5%) and NMs (27.8%). Patients undergoing concomitant treatment with allopurinol were associated with a higher incidence of ADRs (n = 4, 100% vs. n = 105, 20%; p = 0.002).ConclusionTPMT genotyping before AZA prescription reduces ADR incidence in IMs to a similar level as NMs in the Spanish population. However, it is important to note no IMs completed 6 months of treatment, suggesting that there may be some differences in drug tolerability according to phenotype. In addition, most NMs are treated with subtherapeutic doses, are poorly followed up, and thus suffer avoidable ADRs. Finally, concomitant therapies that inhibit the xanthine oxidase enzyme (XDH), such as allopurinol, predispose to ADRs. Therefore, pharmacogenetic testing should be integrated as an additional clinical tool, in such a way that each patient receives personalized, precision treatment, where all factors influencing drug response are considered.

Project description:ImportancePrecise estimation of the drug metabolism capacity for individual patients is crucial for adequate dose personalization.ObjectiveTo quantify the difference in the antipsychotic and antidepressant exposure among patients with genetically associated CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 poor (PM), intermediate (IM), and normal (NM) metabolizers.Data sourcesPubMed, Clinicaltrialsregister.eu, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and CENTRAL databases were screened for studies from January 1, 1990, to June 30, 2020, with no language restrictions.Study selectionTwo independent reviewers performed study screening and assessed the following inclusion criteria: (1) appropriate CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 genotyping was performed, (2) genotype-based classification into CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 NM, IM, and PM categories was possible, and (3) 3 patients per metabolizer category were available.Data extraction and synthesisThe Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed for extracting data and quality, validity, and risk of bias assessments. A fixed-effects model was used for pooling the effect sizes of the included studies.Main outcomes and measuresDrug exposure was measured as (1) dose-normalized area under the plasma level (time) curve, (2) dose-normalized steady-state plasma level, or (3) reciprocal apparent total drug clearance. The ratio of means (RoM) was calculated by dividing the mean drug exposure for PM, IM, or pooled PM plus IM categories by the mean drug exposure for the NM category.ResultsBased on the data derived from 94 unique studies and 8379 unique individuals, the most profound differences were observed in the patients treated with aripiprazole (CYP2D6 PM plus IM vs NM RoM, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.57; 12 studies; 1038 patients), haloperidol lactate (CYP2D6 PM vs NM RoM, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.40-2.02; 9 studies; 423 patients), risperidone (CYP2D6 PM plus IM vs NM RoM, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.28-1.44; 23 studies; 1492 patients), escitalopram oxalate (CYP2C19 PM vs NM, RoM, 2.63; 95% CI, 2.40-2.89; 4 studies; 1262 patients), and sertraline hydrochloride (CYP2C19 IM vs NM RoM, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.27-1.51; 3 studies; 917 patients). Exposure differences were also observed for clozapine, quetiapine fumarate, amitriptyline hydrochloride, mirtazapine, nortriptyline hydrochloride, fluoxetine hydrochloride, fluvoxamine maleate, paroxetine hydrochloride, and venlafaxine hydrochloride; however, these differences were marginal, ambiguous, or based on less than 3 independent studies.Conclusions and relevanceIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, the association between CYP2C19/CYP2D6 genotype and drug levels of several psychiatric drugs was quantified with sufficient precision as to be useful as a scientific foundation for CYP2D6/CYP2C19 genotype-based dosing recommendations.

Dataset Information

CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets