Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Asthma rehabilitation at high vs. low altitude: randomized parallel-group trial.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:To investigate the effect of asthma rehabilitation at high altitude (3100?m, HA) compared to low altitude (760?m, LA). METHODS:For this randomized parallel-group trial insufficiently controlled asthmatics (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) >?0.75) were randomly assigned to 3-week in-hospital rehabilitation comprising education, physical-&breathing-exercises at LA or HA. Co-primary outcomes assessed at 760?m were between group changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF)-variability, and ACQ) from baseline to end-rehabilitation and 3?months thereafter. RESULTS:50 asthmatics were randomized [median (quartiles) LA: ACQ 2.7(1.7;3.2), PEF-variability 19%(14;33); HA: ACQ 2.0(1.6;3.0), PEF-variability 17%(12;32)]. The LA-group improved PEF-variability by median(95%CI) -7%(-?14 to 0, p?=?0.033), ACQ -?1.4(-?2.2 to -?0.9, p?

SUBMITTER: Saxer S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6657156 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<h4>Background</h4>To investigate the effect of asthma rehabilitation at high altitude (3100 m, HA) compared to low altitude (760 m, LA).<h4>Methods</h4>For this randomized parallel-group trial insufficiently controlled asthmatics (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) > 0.75) were randomly assigned to 3-week in-hospital rehabilitation comprising education, physical-&breathing-exercises at LA or HA. Co-primary outcomes assessed at 760 m were between group changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF)-varia  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7407281 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5415445 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4893839 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9157563 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4373316 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6613174 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10422780 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9546133 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3785216 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5569500 | biostudies-literature